Copyrighted Logo

css menu by Css3Menu.com


 

Bruce's 5th book, a Home Study Course, is now available.
Books & Tapes by Bruce Moen
    Bruce's Blog now at http://www.afterlife-knowledge.com/blog....

  HomeHelpSearchLoginRegister  
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6
Send Topic Print
What People Lose at Death (Read 52151 times)
recoverer
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 5027
Gender: male
Re: What People Lose at Death
Reply #30 - Apr 20th, 2007 at 6:55pm
 
Don:

Regarding the below, are you saying that Christ no longer knows that he was Jesus of Nazareth, Mary no longer knows that she was his mother, Paul no longer knows that he was one of the authors of the new testament?

Losing limiting/false psychological thought patterns and losing memories are two different things.  Certainly a spirit can understand that it is no longer a body based being without forgetting that it once made use of one.

If spirits lose their human memories, how can they maintain a basis for having some sort of working relationship with the physical World?

I think you're going too far in your efforts to establish that anybody who communicates with spirits are communicating with imposters. Perhaps a case by case approach is needed.


[quote author=Berserk link=1176784696/15#15 date=1177014499]
“Now he has to get ready to shed a large part of this more familiar self....The traveller must face the...demise of the personal self, because it is becoming no longer tenable to live within its limitations...What is meant by the `personal self?’  It is the sum of all the person’s memories of the experiences, thoughts, and feelings which made up his sense of himself...during his past life on
earth...It is a kind of oblivion, but a conscious oblivion...The man leaves his desire body.  He is perfectly conscious.  He passes into a great stillness...He cannot think.  No faculty is alive, yet  he knows that he is...and his soul is filled with a wonderful peace (Paul Beard, 123, 130-31).”

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
DaBears
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 254
Re: What People Lose at Death
Reply #31 - Apr 20th, 2007 at 6:59pm
 
recoverer wrote on Apr 20th, 2007 at 6:55pm:
Don:

Regarding the below, are you saying that Christ no longer knows that he was Jesus of Nazareth, Mary no longer knows that she was his mother, Paul no longer knows that he was one of the authors of the new testament?

Losing limiting/false psychological thought patterns and losing memories are two different things.  Certainly a spirit can understand that it is no longer a body based being without forgetting that it once made use of one.

If spirits lose their human memories, how can they maintain a basis for having some sort of working relationship with the physical World? Perhaps a case by case approach is needed.

I think you're going too far in your efforts to establish that anybody who communicates with spirits are communicating with imposters.


[quote author=Berserk link=1176784696/15#15 date=1177014499]
“Now he has to get ready to shed a large part of this more familiar self....The traveller must face the...demise of the personal self, because it is becoming no longer tenable to live within its limitations...What is meant by the `personal self?’  It is the sum of all the person’s memories of the experiences, thoughts, and feelings which made up his sense of himself...during his past life on
earth...It is a kind of oblivion, but a conscious oblivion...The man leaves his desire body.  He is perfectly conscious.  He passes into a great stillness...He cannot think.  No faculty is alive, yet  he knows that he is...and his soul is filled with a wonderful peace (Paul Beard, 123, 130-31).”


Nice post, and I agree with you a 100 %.. Because my good ol' deceased gpa tries to get my attention by giving me signs and visiting me in my dreams.. One dream I received PUL, from him!! It was amazing!!!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Rondele
Ex Member


Re: What People Lose at Death
Reply #32 - Apr 21st, 2007 at 8:41am
 
"During earth life the spirit of man acting upon the brain and body...produces a reaction which we call mind.  the mind builds a mental body in which the mind lives and demonstrates.  If the hour of transition overtakes the spirit of man...without the spirit body being built up in which he can live and pass over and demonstrate in realms of light--then that unprepared spirit must take refuge in the mental body which man's mind has built.  The spirit that has never differentiated itself from its mind may be quite at home and even happy in the mental body.  That mental body, however, is inadequate for the spirit of man to live and to progress in beyond the mental plane.  In it he cannot travel to, or enter, the higher planes of spirit in Heavenly Light.  In it he cannot find his soul or fuse with it (106-107)."


Don-

I wonder what Vincent meant by certain occasions when the spirit body was not built up at the time of death?  Does he describe this body?  Does he say how we can be sure it is built up before we die? 

He clearly is differentiating it from the mental body. 

Can you clarify? 

Thanks,
R
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
dave_a_mbs
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 1655
central california
Gender: male
Re: What People Lose at Death
Reply #33 - Apr 21st, 2007 at 3:09pm
 
Thanks for the encouragement Rob-Here's some quick ways to experience Primary Process without the use of drugs or becoming dead -

(1) Go dancing. As you dance you stop thinking "right foot, left foot" and  just DO IT. That's primary.
(2) Lift a weight. As you lift, notice that your mind shuts down and everything is focussed on DOING.
(3) Have a really fantastic sexual encounter. Everything dissolves into DOING and BEING.
(4) Meditate - the state in which the "things of the world fall away" leaves a primary residue.
(5) Go rescue a few stuck souls and notice how they are thinking. That's Primary Process, 2nd person.
(6) Or one of my favorites, D T Suzuki told us, "When you drop fart, you don't think. It just come."
(7) (If you are in good health) hold your breath until you suffocate. (Ugh! - but it works.) A healthy body will reset and return to life.
(8) The process of past life regression leads to a primary level of functioning for both the "regresee" and also the spooks encountered in the spirit world.

The problem with trying to do this intellectually is that the experience is not on a level that is intellectually accessible. That's why the Zen people invented koans. I can load myself down with quotations galore, and I can talk about Hindu Koshas, Spiritual levels of the Astral World, how it feels to dream, and how the banks of the river form a "memory" that resembles our own, but in the end they are nothing but  ideas on how life feels, and often only with respect to other people who tried to express them using a language inadequate to the task - and that is most definitely NOT primary. In fact, it usually isn't even good logic or an accurate rendition of the underlying feelings.

Personally, when I start to feel that I really can tell the world how it is, I  recall the tale of the ass laden with textbooks. The brilliant astronomer Eddington suggested that the solution to this is to make certain that we can insert numbers into our ideas and use them to figure something out. If not, all we have is interesting daydreams.

My personal work is to reduce these ideas to a topology of self-arranging, self-originating, points of information in a more or less Riemannian space, using only probability and relational terms. If you really like math, it offers a wonderful problem in dynamic set operations. The resulting model also happens to explain creativity, scientific growth and similar stuff, which is where I started my inquiry. My 1987 PhD thesis in that area is available at University Microfilms, or their successor, but you'd have to dig a bit for it in the "irregular" section. It gives the basic primary mechanisms in detail, but is awfully basic. There's an update in one chapter and Appendix of my "Developmental Psychopathology" (2006 - BookSurge.com, a text for regression hypnotherapists) and I'm working on a far more general version with more of the corners tucked in for past life researchers.

My suggestion is to not go and try to read about it. Instead, meditate. Experience primary process at the level of nirvakalpa samadhi, and be done with the whole issue. Then it makes sense, and all the preceeding bafflegab falls away.

dave

dave
Back to top
 

life is too short to drink sour wine
WWW  
IP Logged
 
juditha
Ex Member


Re: What People Lose at Death
Reply #34 - Apr 21st, 2007 at 3:20pm
 
Hi Don  When we go to the spirit world at our death,we forget nothing of our time on earth,nothing is ever forgotten,we are in spirit as we were in physical,i know this as a medium,when spirit come through they bring many memories from there earth life to prove who they are ,so we do not forget,our memories and our personalities go with us to spirit at the time of death and we never lose this.

Love and God bless      Love Juditha
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
dave_a_mbs
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 1655
central california
Gender: male
Re: What People Lose at Death
Reply #35 - Apr 21st, 2007 at 5:38pm
 
Juditha - a question -

I don't know what trance level you work at, but as a person actively using these skills, you definitely are using "primary processing"when you contact other spirits. Would you be inclined to agree with my general statement that we "live our thoughts when using primary process" as opposed to doing it abstractly in our heads?  I'd expect this to be true of both the medium and the spirits contacted.

To my experience this makes sense, but I'd be interested in your views.
d
Back to top
 

life is too short to drink sour wine
WWW  
IP Logged
 
LaffingRain
Super Member
*****
Offline


Choose this Day

Posts: 5249
Arizona
Gender: female
Re: What People Lose at Death
Reply #36 - Apr 22nd, 2007 at 2:06pm
 
thanks Dave for letting us know about primary process. it's a new phrase for me, but I like the way you introduced it. love, alysia
Back to top
 

... Who takes away death's sting deprives life of bitterness
WWW http://www.facebook.com/LaughingRain2  
IP Logged
 
juditha
Ex Member


Re: What People Lose at Death
Reply #37 - Apr 23rd, 2007 at 1:54pm
 
Hi Dave I receive thoughts from spirit ,that are communicating with me and also visions in my mind ,thats how i talk to spirit,i only just read what you wrote me as i would have answered you earlier,spirit give me clues who they are by using there earth memories. Sometimes i actually see the spirit im talking to but i see them from a side way glance mostly and sometimes a front veiw as well. Ive actually had my hair gently pulled and taps on my forehead and sometimes my shirt has been lifted up slightly by spirit.

Its hard sometimes to work out ,whether some are your thoughts and not spirit as every medium goes through this and that is why i write excactly what i receive,i have to trust in spirit,which i do now but i used to have ny doubts sometimes.

I remember when i went on stage the first time ,this woman walked in and straight away i was given the names Rosemary and Daisie and shown this old farm house scene with a swing and animals and i thought "no its me whats thinking this and i said nothing to this woman,then i thought "no i have to trust in spirit" so i told this woman these two names of rosemary and daisie and of the farm scene and she said that rosemary and daisie were her two aunts and they brought her up and she lived on a farm with a swing.So ive learned to trust in myself as a medium.

Love and God bless  Love Juditha
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
recoverer
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 5027
Gender: male
Re: What People Lose at Death
Reply #38 - Apr 23rd, 2007 at 2:08pm
 
Dave:

Speaking of messages, recently my guidance showed me your name. I believe because they thought it would be a good idea for me to read what you wrote about primary process. Another thing that sort of relates to you. One time they showed me the cover of Michael Newton's third book. I believe the purpose was so I could find how directed his hypnosis is, which is something you have stated before.


Quote:
Hi Dave I receive thoughts from spirit ,that are communicating with me and also visions in my mind ,thats how i talk to spirit,i only just read what you wrote me as i would have answered you earlier,spirit give me clues who they are by using there earth memories. Sometimes i actually see the spirit im talking to but i see them from a side way glance mostly and sometimes a front veiw as well.

Love and God bless  Love Juditha

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
dave_a_mbs
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 1655
central california
Gender: male
Re: What People Lose at Death
Reply #39 - Apr 23rd, 2007 at 2:40pm
 
Hi Juditha-  I'll try to be more clear -

The term "primary process" is an ancient Freudian inheritance that sort of vanished when B F Skinner came out with studies in behavioral modification through rewards. What it initially referred to is the level of function of the  inner "self" before there is any thinking or other specific training to get along. In the same way, primary processing is the kind of self directing and orienting operation that we use when we are in a deep meditation in which the body and learned coping mechanisms aren't being used - or when we are wandering about in the astral without a body and responding to the circumstances in which we find ourselves.

Primary process is not a popular concept in modern psychology because almost nobody looks "inside the mind" any more, preferring to use Skinner's idea that the mind is just a "black box" that acts like a computer, and can be programmed. That's where a lot of modern therapy focusses - as well as giving pills to change functioning. The result is that therapy is oriented to learning to cope with a problem, as opposed to getting rid of it, with chemicals to numb us so we don't care, and we can return to work as productive members of society. Thus we are generating a huge army of the "walking wounded" who live on mind-altering medications.

Psychologists who do spiritual work, and psychoanalysts in general (this is where I got caught up in these ideas), are generally "intrapsychic theorists", meaning that we are interested in the inner workings of the mind, and the manner in which mental disorders are explained by conflicts and
circular definitions in the primary process level. We work to totally resolve issues in exactly the same way as Bruce gets souls unstuck. The process takes effort and time, but actually gets rid of the conflicts and so on by working with emotional components, as opposed to thinking. The fact that psychoanalytic therapy turns out to be essentially the same as soul retrieval interests me, since it suggests the way that everything in the spiritual world that involves the life and times of the soul must occur.

I was trying to find a way to express this, and was suggesting that one way to do it would be to think of it as "living the thought", in the sense that in that state we tend to think and act through total involvement of our entire being. The idea that I was toying with was that your access to Spirit must be in a state of meditation, that is, with the "inner voice" quieted so that you can perceive clearly. (Some people call this the "sound of silence".)  When the inner voice, which is the mechanism of abstract thinking, is silent, only the primary level of function remains.

My basic question was whether you would agree with me that the nature of function at this level is not like abstract thought, but rather that "thinking" is the same as acting, and involves a total involvement of our entire "being". - (Bad description, language is inadequate here, but I hope that you can follow my thought.) So I am suggesting that on the primary level of the existence of the soul, thought and action are equivalent, and occur in the face of raw emotion.

If that makes sense, I'm interested in what your feelings are.

PUL
dave







Back to top
 

life is too short to drink sour wine
WWW  
IP Logged
 
juditha
Ex Member


Re: What People Lose at Death
Reply #40 - Apr 23rd, 2007 at 3:36pm
 
Hi Dave   I hope i get this right for you,the only thing of acting same as the thinking is that you actually feel the symptons of what the spirit died of also the emotions like tears and sadness which you feel whilst talking to spirit,so i agree with you that the thinking is the same as the acting,i'm sorry if i have answered wrong dave, im a little bit slow on the uptake sometimes and i dont always understand the words. i get spirit come to me in meditation and even when im writing on the afterlife.

Love and God bless   love juditha
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Berserk
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 979
Gender: male
Re: What People Lose at Death
Reply #41 - Apr 23rd, 2007 at 4:02pm
 
Rather than debate what has been alleged in this thread, I will focus on the astral vision of Rev. Howell Vincent and his family during their deathbed vigil, first over his daughter Rea and later over her new husband Herbert.  This couple died from wounds sustained in a car crash during their honeymoon in 1941.  In this post I will quote excerpts form Howell's report on Rea's passing.

"Unseen and silent, a lovely procession of joyous brides were always there undergirding her with the power of their triumphant joy as little by little she detached her spirit body from its broken physical counterpart...Little by little the temporal substance was transmuted for her into eternal substance." 

"Three times during those darkest hours of her lonely struggle, Rea turned to me and asked, `Woofus, how much longer has this got to to last?'  I replied, `Just a little while. Walk  bravely, my darling, ...underneath are the everlasting arms.'  At the last she said, `But I cannot see you now; I am trying to see you, Daddy.'  `Yes,' I replied, `you will soon see clearly the beauty that is all around you.'...At that moment of Rea's triumph over mortality the gracious presence or those brides, her celestial escort, was clearly revealed to her..."

"At that time, Rea was standing in the hospital room beside us.  Her physical body lay on the bed still and lifeless, while she stood beside it in her spirit body that had been derived from the physical by transmutation.  These processes of transmutation had been active for years but more especially so since the accident...Brilliant light of many colors poured down upon her and she grew in grace and power and radiance as she absorbed this light..."

"We of earth were permitted to help her.  First we had to release her from the bonds of our fervent desire to keep her with us.  And second, we had to help her faith by lifting her with our faith.  We had to assist her to gain faith-altitude, as it were, from which she could glide over the chasm on this her first celestial flight. ...Across the chasm we could see a group of people watching with joyous interest. ...Foremost in this group stood Nellie, Rea's mother.  There is no describing her radiant beauty..."

"We asked Nellie, `Why don't you come and take hold of Rea and help her start?'  Nellie shook her head; that was not allowed; no help could be given from her side.  Rea had to make her own crossing 'in Light,' with such help as we through love and faith could give her from this side.  The chasm that Rea still had to cross, in part resembled..the barrier of an inferiority complex that has to be attacked and overcome by the person himself."

"She [Rea] turned to us with a childish curtsy, smiled and waved, then turning toward her mother Nellie on those gleaming highlands, she leaned forward as though to take a step and one of her brothers standing just behind her gave her a gentle, loving push, and instantly she was gliding in the rhythm and formation of the bride's ritual dance.  Over the valley now robbed of its shadows, a bride among brides, danced our beautiful Rea into Emmanuel's Land, into the arms of her mother, Nellie ("Lighted Passage," pp. 79-91)." 

In my next planned post, I will report Howell's excerpts about Herbert's passing.

Don
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Berserk
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 979
Gender: male
Re: What People Lose at Death
Reply #42 - Apr 23rd, 2007 at 6:21pm
 
Rea’s new husband, Herbert, lingered on a few days after Rea’s passing.  Rea’s death was initally kept from him, but he soon sensed her passing.  “Herbert was not only stricken with immeasurable grief but also obsessed with the idea that we all surely must blame him, even hate him, for what he considered his bungling in bringing such a catastrophe [= car crash] to Rea and all of us...
Herbert’s second birth was similar to that of Rea.  The difference was due to the undeveloped state of Herbert’s spirit body...because of lack of experience during earth life.   Herbert’s spirit had been engrossed in experiencing practical lessons, and was almost wholly realistic, depending on the physical body to contain and express the motivations of his spirit.”

“Even while the doctors and nurses were doing all they could for Herbert’s physical body, we saw beings of a similar function on the spirit side building up Herbert’s spirit body, more especially the right side.  It was like plastic surgery.  Herbert’s spirit mind responded to all these helpful services
and the color of his spirit body was seen to improve to progressively brighter shades.”

Herbert asked, `Where is Rea?’  We answered, `Rea is here; can’t you see Rea?  She is right here.’  `But I cannot see her.  Rea!  Rea!  Where are you?’  She answered, `I am here.’  Then Herbert said, `I see Rea now.’  But at that time it was only a glimpse now and then.  We told Herbert, `Mother Nellie and Grandmother Nesbit are here; look for them.’  He then saw Rea’s mother Nellie and exclaimed, `Oh I am going now--soon now, soon!’”...

“We were able to give him help and confidence from this world...Rea was not able to reach Herbert but so very anxious to help.  We saw Herbert’s being disturbed, due to his spirit body’s being too weak to get over the  chasm.  we were given to understand a general outline of the fixed laws and their equations involved in the transition of spirit, and also the possible solutions of
some of the problems arising therefrom.  It was the complexity of these problems with no solution in sight that disturbed Herbert.”

“He saw Rea in her spirit body of Light sufficiently transmuted to permit her development in spirit beyond the mental plane.  He could join her in his mental body for a while but not proceed with her into the truly spiritual Heavens.  His mental body was very strong. ; but how could he galvanize his impotent spirit body to cross the chasm to her side?  Mother Nellie was not permitted to help him from above, although she stood closer to him than Rea or the others.”

“Herbert was floundering, and one of us watching on this side was given to know that he must help Herbert’s infant spirit body reach the arms of Mother Nellie, on the other side of the chasm.   He drew himself into the vibration of  Nellie...and approached her, pushing Herbert, in his spirit body, ahead of him.  By an extreme effort of faith, trained in spiritual exercise, he had in his spirit
body just enough power to push Herbert into Mother  Nellie’s arms.  When Nellie was brought thus into contact with Herbert’s spirit body,  through this act of faith from this side, as  soon as she actually touched Herbert, she picked him up and held him as a baby son, his head on her left shoulder, his body obliquely across her body, and his legs across her right thigh.  Herbert was quiet then.  Though weak, he was conscious and happy with Mother Nellie.  He could then
rcognize and watch Rea.  Nellie continued to care for Herbert until his spirit body was strengthened into the power of a resurrection body through further transmution.  This was accomplished at the time of the funeral in the Church at South Sutton, New Hampshire, September 2, two days later (“Lighted Passage,” pp. 93, 103, 108).”

The retrieval or, better, assistance offered this couple raises at least 4 important issues:

(1) It implies that the mental body must be discarded and replaced by a spirit body before progress can be made.  

(2) It illustrates the role of the prayers and efforts of earthly loved ones in facilitating the upward "ascent" of our deceased loved ones.

(3) It also alerts us the limitations imposed on our discarnate loved ones in assisting our transition.  This of course raises questions about the advantages and disadvantages of being discarnate in the performance of soul retrievals.

(4) It raises the question of the absence of Herbert's deceased loved ones from his postmortem greeting party.  Were they absent because their memory of Herbert was impaired on their spirit plane? Because they lacked the strong bond that Rea's family had established with her?  Because they were on a lower plane in which souls are not informed about their loved ones' passing?  Such quesions could be mutliplied.   The point is this: the absence of loved ones in this greeting party is as important an issue as those who are present.

Don
Back to top
« Last Edit: Apr 23rd, 2007 at 8:03pm by Berserk »  
 
IP Logged
 
dave_a_mbs
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 1655
central california
Gender: male
Re: What People Lose at Death
Reply #43 - Apr 23rd, 2007 at 7:44pm
 
With respect, Don, I think it implies a bit less, and we get back to the problem of verification.

(1) There is the implication that there exists  a "mental body" of various strengths, and that there exists a "spirit body" (aka "Spirit body of Light") and that these are differentiable in a (hopefully) non-trivial manner.

(2) There is the implication that there exist spiritual (?) doctors and nurses who operate on spiritual bodies in a manner seemingly analogous to physical practices.

(3) It implies that "brighter shades" exist, and that they are meaningful.

(4) There is the implication of a "chasm" across which the "spirit body" had to get across, but we do not know its nature nor why to cross it.

(5) We are told that some problems have no visible solution and that this can disturb the individual making the transition across the chasm.

(6) (a) It implies that the "spirit body of Light" is transmutable in a manner that permits development. (b) and that this development extends beyond the mental plane. 

(7) The existence of a mental plane is implied, and is located below the "spiritual heavens".

(8) It is implied that the spirit body might be impotent.

(9) It is implied that dead relatives may be present at death, but their abilities are limited by laws in that place.

(10) Spirit bodies are given relative ages, such as "infant".

(11) The spirit body is implied to give off vibrations by which it can be recognized.

(12) Contact interaction between spirits is implied.

(13) The body of a spirit is like the physical body.

(14) There is an embodiment called a "resurrection body" which occurs through some kind of "transmutation".

I don't wish to criticize the literary value of the selection, but it seems necessary to point out that it uses a vast number of terms without any type of definition.  To try to draw conclusions from this array of ill-defined concepts seems to me to be a poor idea.

This criticism does not argue that there is anything wrong with the selection nor its content, but simply that we can't really tell what it means.

In your conclusions, I'd suggest that whatever the mental body is and what discarding it might mean, and by what alternative  it is to be replaced may be true, but will remain meaningless until we can define what these terms mean.

I do not understand what the "upward 'ascent'" actually means. I can only assume that you mean some sort of spiritual induction into a place that is "above us" - and I don't know how
above" might be defined.

The selection states that there are limitations to what some of the characters could do. That this raises questions about being incarnate or discarnate is a non sequitur.

Similarly, questions about the presence or absence of Herbert's dead relations are your own, and carry the implicit assumption that not mentioning them means that they were not present. Your suggestions about reasons and their importance for not being present are speculation on your part.

Your statement that, "The point is this: the absence of loved ones in this greeting party is as important an issue as those who are present. " is a non sequitur.

I have great respect for people who are widely read and who know a lot of facts. Years ago I read or scanned the entire U C Berkeley Psych Library's Metaphysics section, every book. That is a great way to develop sensitivity, awareness of the state of the art, and common idioms in use. But it is not a way to do science, and in particular, it is not a substitute for methodology. That fact that ten million people write books claim, on the basis of well documented personal experience, that all crows are black birds, is not science. It is merely opinion - not even theory, because there is no test by which to falsify it. Maybe one albino crow lives in Patagonia, I don't know.

When doing bibliometric research, it might be more useful to  give terms and usage freqencies, as well as the associations used that seem to define what the terms mean, and how much variance is expected within and between authors etc. However, that does not validate the terms as having a real meaning - merely that a lot of people use them. As an example, a lot of French people use the term "Merde", but they do not actually imply an experience of excrement, nor that they have stepped in some etc.

Personally, I'd like to see where you go with these ideas after developing the ability to meditate deeply - at the "sound of silence" level and beyond, and after you have had some of these experiences. This is not an attempt to be snotty (God knows I have a long way to go!), but to encourage you to actually go and see, rather than quoting experiences with which you have limited familiarity. For some of us this is an almost impossible task (I am the worst case example I know of) but it can be done. I earnestly wish you all possible success in this venture.

Respectfully,
dave
Back to top
 

life is too short to drink sour wine
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Berserk
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 979
Gender: male
Re: What People Lose at Death
Reply #44 - Apr 30th, 2007 at 12:22am
 
[Dave:] “There is the implication that there exists  a "mental body" of various strengths, and that there exists a "spirit body" (aka "Spirit body of Light") and that these are differentiable in a (hopefully) non-trivial manner...(a) It implies that the "spirit body of Light" is transmutable in amanner that permits development. (b) and that this development extends beyond the mental
plane.”  
_________________________

The astral guidance offered for Rea and Herbert by Howell’s family members during their deathbed vigil raises as many questions as it solves.   What makes it unique is that it involves a group astral vision of the same series of transitional events to the afterlife.  As already noted, this family circle had previously experienced the materialiation of an astral flower from Nellie that was pressed and preserved.  Howell’s astral and retrieval gifts seem genuine.   This isnight is important to me due to my belief that all the retrievals reported on the AK board are bogus--cartoony and woefully deficient in accompanying verifications.   I will never learn to perform retrievals if I have no respect for alleged retrievals.  So my interest in Howell’s book is deeply personal.  

The assistance offered the dying Rea and Herbert by Howell’s circle implies that the integration of spirit and soul is essential to making the transition across “the chasm.”  Howell claims that his group actually wintesses the spirit body’s “transmutation.”  I am not clear about the validity of his metaphysical distinctions.  He does not define his terms.   But I am grateful for the attention he draws to the alleged need for such a “transmutation” and “integration” experience.  

In many NDEs, the tunnel experience is followed by an encounter with a Light which the patient identifies as his higher self.   This experience may not be the equivalent of reported encounters with a Being of Light (often Christ).  Rather, it may represent an alternative take on Howell’s observations about the integration of Rea and Herbert with their “soul.”  Here is Howell’s description of his own expereince of his “spirit’s” integration with his “soul:”  

“The integration of soul and spirit in man is an experience of growth which each individual must seek and obtain for himself before he is freed from the obligation of mundane life...I was praying in the Technique of Light, using an exercise of Convsiousness Breathing...Like a stroke of lightning, the vision came unexpectedly...Its effect abides with me even in the writing out of this
testimony...I experienced a spiritual sense of awareness that was similar to sight.  I sensed a dazzling whte light that enveloped my whole being, and permeated every cell of my body.   All energies of life were brought into perfect poise and seemed to be expanded infinitely.  Volumes of truth that were new to me swept across my consciousness as floodlights sweep across the stage.”  

“I could discern no form with my eyes but my spirit knew that the spiritual light had a form that merged with my physical body, a perfect complement interpenetrating each limb and organ and cell...It was not somthing or somebody apart from me...It was a rather familiar remembered self,
that I had lost for ages, and now having contacted, I recognize `her’ to be my soul...It is a man’soul in him integrating with his spirit in him...Before that time I did not know that i had a soul distinctly different from my spirit (131-137).”

[Dave:] “There is the implication that there exist spiritual (?) doctors and nurses who operate on spiritual bodies in a manner seemingly analogous to physical practices.”
________________________________________________________

During his NDE, Howard Storm’s astral body is shredded by multiple spirit assailants and he is left barely aware that he still exists.  A few years ago, an AK poster reported witnessing a similar dismemberment of an astral body which discouraged him from further astral exploration.  In Storm’s case, when Jesus comes to the rescue, He repairs Storm’s badly damaged astral body.   Like other astral adepts,  Robert Bruce reports visiting astral “Hospitals during his OBEs.  In my thread on medical researcher, Phyllis’s NDE, she reports  spirit doctors performing healing "surgery" on her astral body.   As as result, she no longer needs the planned earthly surgery when she returns to her body.  Howell seems to bear independent witness to such astral surgery, though the “surgeons” are inviisible to him.  .
 
[Dave:] “There is the implication of a "chasm" across which the "spirit body" had to get across, but we do not know its nature nor why to cross it.”
_______________________________________

I suspect that this “chasm”, “the tunnel” of NDEs, and the “inky void” of many OBEs are images for different astral conditions that are easily confused and wrongly merged.   If this “chasm” is a barrier that is hard for some to cross and cannot be bridged with the help of discarnate loved ones, then it seems vital to learn more about how this impasse should be handled.   Howell’s team
ease the couple’s transition.  But how would Rea and Herbert have fared without their earthly assistance?   Hopefully, they would have only experienced a  delay, but this question needs to be settled by astral research and not by New Age feel-good dogmatism.    

[Dave:] “ It is implied that dead relatives may be present at death, but their abilities are limited by laws in that place.”
_______________

Yes, this implication impresses me because I would not predict it on the basis that Howell’s circle is merely imagining a bogus series of astral events.   Yet New Age projectors sometimes allege that discarnate helpers have some disadvantages in comparison with earthly wannabe retrievers.  

[Dave:] “Similarly, questions about the presence or absence of Herbert's dead relations are your own, and carry the implicit assumption that not mentioning them means that they were not present. Your suggestions about reasons and their importance for not being present are speculation on your part.
____________________________________________________

I am trying to clarify issues raised by Howell; I was not making any dogmatic claims.  True, in any given case, no one can know whether other relatives lurk unnoticed in the astral background.   But I am drawing attention to the bigger picture.  What determines the composition of an NDE greeting party.   NDE reports often mention the presence of only one or just few deceased relatives in the greeting party.    The spirits present are often identified.   The question of the absence of other relatives whose presence might be expected seems to be overlooked and is worth investigating.  

There are 4 possible reasons for their absence.
(1) Their earth memories have become dormant.  ES and Classical Channeling support the view that such memory loss is the norm.   In the case of channeling, this claim seems to be in tension with the chatty access mediums allegedly have to discarnate spirits.  Is this contradiction to be resolved by supposing that mediums contact the discarnate loved one’s mind in a manner of which that loved one is not consciously aware?  I don’t know.  ES imples  that “the Lord” may on occasion permit memory restoration, but the circumstances of this restoration are clouded in mystery.

(2) For other reasons, they do not know about the passing of their close family member.  Perhaps, they need to be informed by discarnate spirits who specialize in such greetings.

(3) Perhaps, participation in such a greeting party is possible for residents of some spirit planes and not  others.  For example, such participation may be impossible for residents of lower hellish planes.  .

(4) Perhaps, the absentee discarnate relatives were not as emotionally close to the newly dead as the latter imagined.  

Don
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6
Send Topic Print


This is a Peer Moderated Forum. You can report Posting Guideline violations.