Hello everyone,

I propose a partnered exploration with everybody interested and experienced in the retrieval technique.

The target would be a member of my family who passed away lately.

Talk to you soon.

Cheers

You may not even be interested anymore. I think you can see by the content of this forum that many people who are regulars here are distracted by other subjects and completely unable to assist the curious passers by who visit here.

At least, in this particular capacity......However, I still believe it is within the realm of possibility that with perhaps at least one more participant some real information might be gathered.

I think it is always interesting to gather your own information through experience, whether alone or in groups. There is a certain feeling connected to it. Over time, it can be almost a certainty. However, I hesitate to adorn any experience of mine with any particular wisdom which would be essential to anyone else.

The whole point is to have your own experience. What other point is there?

Yes, I think it might be good to have a group larger than two. But not absolutely necessary. I think your results could be more interesting with a larger group. A particular person might have information which comes through more clearly which ties the whole group experience together better. But, that is just my opinion regarding this particular kind of exercise. There is, of course, also work you can do alone or other avenues to explore.

In addition, I do not work privately. You must be willing to have a public conversation here. I have no p.m. function here and have not for a long long long time.

I do not need a name, in my opinion. If I participate I will simply meditate and open up to whatever information I get. I may get nothing, but that is how I would participate. I really don't understand why being given a name is necessary. People on the other side should be able to figure this out, in my opinion.

I would personally approach this as an experiment. I make no claims that I have any special gifts. If you wanted to agree on a place to meet 'out there' we could see how the details of any impressions we got during meditation related to each other. Otherwise, it could be totally open. I don't regularly meditate in this particular way, but I would use a guided meditation of my choosing to bring me into a very relaxed state. I would then simply imagine that communication is possible and open my mind to that possibility. I would ask for a message for you. I would try to remember what I could. I would repeat that back to you. I have had visits in dreams of a loved one which were very vivid. It is certainly possible that you are receiving some kind of messages in your daily life or in dreams, but that is not for me to say. Weekends are better for me, so let's just say Saturday or Sunday, if you want. If it's not for you, that's fine too.

Quote:


What repetitious argument are you refering at please ????

Vicky wrote on May 18^th, 2017 at 11:48am:



Do you understand what are "the repetitious arguments are so tedious" Seagull refered to ? And the reason why Seagull left ?

Hi Vicky-

"There are a few long-term members here who don't see eye to eye on various beliefs and continue to discuss and argue their opposing views."

I think while that was the case, the forum has much less of that now. Yes, we all don't agree on some things, but I don't see the kind and amount of arguing that used to exist. To me the forum is a much more welcoming place.

R

Offering this view as one who engaged in partnered retrievals [long ago]:

At that time I felt it was necessary to coordinate a time when all participants would meet. This is a mistaken view. This sort of work takes place out-of-time. That is my experience. All that is necessary is a retrieval target.

Likely one will make itself known. The individual will be in resonance with the needs of the retrieval participants, and I "get" this is being arranged. I have the feeling the target will be an "easy" one so that all feel a measure of success.

Ok nice. So next time i would like to try my perception skills. Our rules after reading the last exploration topics would be like this right?

Before person identification:
- only observe, not intefering with persons field
- no posting of notes on forum or by pm

After person identification:
- comparing perceived data with information about observed persons life from posted url
- notes can be shared on forum topic or exchanged between participants if desired

Soulmael,

A couple of us have been sharing our own results via PMs, but we label the message with "Spoiler Alert" or something like that, so that the other person knows not to read it if they have not done their PE yet.

Personally, I really think it helps to share your findings with someone so as to get their insight after the results are revealed.  Sometimes another person can interpret something in a way you didn't think of, and it helps to have it pointed out.  That's been my experience.

Morrighan wrote on Jul 28^th, 2017 at 1:49pm:


Yay!  Thanks.  I often find myself trying to hit the "Like" button and then realizing there just isn't one.  Too much time on Facebook I guess, LOL