Morrighan:

What is radio like in Ireland? Can you hear a broad range of music on the radio? In the 1970's you could hear a broad range of music in the United States, now radio here is overly commercialized.  Musical artists that made it in the 1970's, would have a difficult time finding the same success today.

"Why do you communicate in a way that is quite different than how people usually communicate? Do you expect people to learn your way of communication?  An unusual way of communicating isn't a sign of wisdom."

No, it isn't a sign of wisdom. As an old campaign commercial asked, "where's the beef?" It smells good, it looks good, people are seduced, salivating for the meal, but the plate is empty.

It's all a game. Clever yes, but a game nonetheless. Anyone care to play 3 Card Monty? Step right up folks, but hold onto your money.

R

Morrighan:

I am speaking for myself now. I never had the intent of insulting you.  On other threads you stated viewpoints that I believe are misleading, and for the benefit of others, I started this thread with differing viewpoints, without naming you. You brought yourself into the conversation.

It would be great if you considered some of the things I said, but that is up to you. It seems as if you have unplugged yourself from the wisdom that others can provide. Big mistake!

Regarding afterlife knowledge, as long as we have the ability to discriminate, I do not believe it is wrong to learn what others have found out. I thank everybody who has helped me learn.

It is very key to consider the fact, that other forum readers could've found out about the things I said about you even if I never said anything, simply by considering some of the  things you wrote.

Nice backpedals and pivots, you two.

Discern how this thread appears to those who come here to participate as respected equals on this forum. Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.

And to be blunt in return in this dismal thread;

The work our teams engage in is largely irrelevant to this forum, and I'm consistently clear that I bring none of that here. If any here presume to know what it is our teams do, it is not gleaned from anything I posted here. I've been most careful not to bring any of that material here except as relevant to the purpose of this forum.

That I have been judged by any here and found insufficiently humble/sincere/authentic is odious to the Nth degree. None have the right. NONE.

Go look for yourselves is precisely what I state. Snidely dissing me is a great deal easier, apparently, than actually looking for yourselves.

"That I have been judged by any here and found insufficiently humble/sincere/authentic is odious to the Nth degree. None have the right. NONE."

Wow. So no one...NOBODY... has the right to evaluate your posts and question their authenticity?  Do you realize how over the top that is?

That might work in a dictatorship but not here. Delusions of grandeur?

Where is Rod Serling when we need him?

R

Yes, that's the difference. If one prefaces what they post as their belief, that's fine. But when they claim that what they say is not to be challenged,  and furthermore say that no one has the right to question their claim, red flags pop up all over the place.

Is it one person or a team, or a way to build credibility? Something to ponder.

R