I agree. Besides through such physical approaches - various kind of interactions can be observed and verified between objects (attraction, dislike, dynamics/structure, and some other cues), which project to timeline-based state/behaviour. For example if seed vitality can be represented by different field dynamics... You know the answer.
But I think there is one important factor here. While there are many kind of measurement systems, that show variety of usefulness related to non-locality (or non-physicality so to speak) - we, the humans - are somewhat addicted to what we see with our eyes (or just in real-world pictures). So it's more convenient to make presentations with visual and object-oriented data than with abstract and representative equations or schematics. Modern mainstream society. Many people buy products following pictures, not quality.
One thing, that most people forget however - is the fact, that non-locality has different shape and spatial spread than physicality we know (is not object oriented, like the external/physical shape of mind for example), and therefore - "translation systems" must be applied in order to get comprehensible content.
By the way. Sometime ago I gave Bruce a conceptual explanation on something that could be used for non-physicality measurements, but as far I discovered later - I hit probably in difficult time and my e-mail maybe went unseen and forgotten. I'd like to mention it here, because it could be used for "translating" between very subtle dynamics into something more measurable. Maybe for ITC communication, and maybe in conjunction with this little leaf project too. So let me paste it.
But first - formalities. I'd like to emphasize that this is my idea/invention, and I share it as an opensource concept under Creative Commons CC-BY-SA licence (= Attribution & Share Alike; for attribution use my name and website; Share Alike to block any attempts of blocking it).
[10.Oct.2011]
A friend of mine, who is one of my explorers (like rosie mcknight was one of the explorers of Bob Monroe), during one of recent spontaneous explorations (she was testing one of my new recordings) - came to an idea that might be interesting for your technical afterlife project.
So here it is.
She received something about mixing colors. If you mix colors in a way similar to mixing sounds (in order to get binaural beats)- as a result you will get different colors. She explained "colors invisible to us, but still perceivable colors". Which means, that these "colors" could appear as "binaural beats" in some radio band, but these are colors that we don't know yet.
She said, that my recording reminded her some her older sessions. She said something like this:
"I remember, that long time ago I had similar receptions... I heard noise, and then I thought that it was a fan/vane rotating clockwise (in right direction). And I wrote then, that 'I must listen to waves from 250 to 480'. But I didn't know what that means. I wrote then, that 'within this range I can contact with someone'.
And during current session, all of sudden, all the dirt moved from my eyes, and everything became clean and navy-violet. And I had the thought, that under these sounds you can put colors, and this will amplify... but I don't know what.
From my old past session, I found that I wrote then automatically with big letters: RADIO - CONNECTION - RECEIVING - BAND - FREQUENCY - REGULATION/TUNING - PARAMETERS - WAVE (in polish: radio - łączność - odbiór - pasmo - częstotliwość - regulacja - parametry - fala).
I only know, that this must be a mix of colors, interweaving one into another, overlaping wich each other."
When I asked about this 250 to 480 band, what is it, she confirmed that this is about MHz band, which gives 250-480MHz radio band.
*
And here is my conclusion. Let say that you have two laser beams, very similar wavelenghts. If you mix these laser beams, you get an electromagnetic differential frequency.
Visible colors are in range of ~4 to ~8THz (from 4 to 8 x 10^14). Mentioned radio waves are in range 250-480MHz (2.5 to 4.8 x 10^8). Light/Radio ratio is 2 x 10^6 which means, that they are less than a half of thousandth of one promile.
Percentagle it is a very small amount of frequency distortion. If the frequency of light could be distorted this way - then a very small difference in light will produce very large difference in radio waves.
Some phenomenons rise in frequency range in a logarithmic way, but some - not. So my opinion would be, that this could be a detector for organized "light structures". Furthermore - laser beams or other eletromagnetic sources could be strong and "unstable" at the same time, which would allow to generate a strong differential beats in radio band, measurable in AM way I guess.
I'm curious, which frequency bands in radio waves are the most "flexible" to afterlife influence, and - which part of much higher bands (like the light spectrum) - correspond to "spiritual" man. maybe they are hidden in UV, but maybe (according to many bioenergy phenomenons) - in near to visible infrared.
What do you think?
Warmly,
J.K.Chris
ayamahambho@gmail.com
http://planetaziemia.net 
Home
Pages: 1 
