DocM
|
Augo,
There is no democracy on a conversation board, nor should there be, because we are all here due to Bruce's kindness in hosting the site - that much is clear. Furthermore, moderator input and banning are occasionally necessary, but I think you and I agree with the manner in which it is done.
To my mind, it seems more friendly and "out in the open," if a defamatory comment arises for a moderator to pop in to the thread and point out the transgression. The person would then be given the opportunity to remove their negative comment, have it stricken, and behave. If they chose not to do so, it would be done for them, and they could be banned for a time. Everyone would see the moderator's input as it came, and that open dialogue would leave little for anyone to say.
I do think Bruce has been quite open about explaining what happened today. I hope my comments are heard in an objective, and constructive way - as that is how they are meant.
I also agree that this is his forum, and that all of us are guests here. As such, courtesy is a paramount attribute to anyone posting.
Matthew
|