The video doesn't start at the beginning of Bruce's talk, and I missed the part where he was providing a hypothetical example. Since I do not believe that he would provide an example that has no similarity to what he has actually experienced, I believe this is somewhat of a mute point. Therefore, saying that his example is hypothetical, doesn't support what you said on an earlier post, as seen below.
------------------
1796 said: "That's fine. If you believe in that limitation upon yourself then that is your limitation. No one can think and function outside of their beliefs, they are always contained by them. And it is for people like yourself that Bruce's method is satisfying. It gives you the results that you will accept. But for those who want more, who want the full view, there is truth."
1796 wrote on Jun 18th, 2017 at 12:25pm:Recoverer 2 wrote on Jun 18th, 2017 at 12:08pm:1796:
I believe it is reasonable to conclude that Bruce used an example that had some similarity to the kind of verifications he has actually received.
Then why did you ask:
Recoverer 2 wrote on Jun 18th, 2017 at 10:53am:1796:
Did you watch the Bruce Moen video that you provided a link for? You speak of people putting a limitation on themselves and not functioning outside of beliefs, yet during his described experience Bruce found out about very precise details that he didn't know before hand. How could such knowledge be the result of his putting a limitation on himself and not allowing himself to function outside of his beliefs?
You are all over the place like a mad woman's custard.