Hi all.

Owing to positive reception of the practice target in a recent thread, here is a new practice target.

This individual is recently deceased. The target is for only observation. Please not to interfere with his field or his journey. Again, there are no right or wrong answers, there is no grade.

And away we go! I will post infos about this individual in seven days.



Disclaimer: this is not a true double-blind target. As I am the one who selected the target, that means I hold awareness of the identity of the recently deceased. While my field is closed to you (general you), it may yet be possible for you to pick up some of my field as you observe the target. Please to keep this in mind as you place your intent. In other words, stay on target. Thank you.

In a true double-blind project, a third party would select the target and I (as moderator) would be unaware of the target when I post the start of project. This ensures those who participate do not pick up on my field. Another way to say that is my awareness of the target can be removed as a factor in target acquisition if I do not know the target.

There is no need for such rigor within this framework. No scientific experiment is underway. It's just practice. It's about strengthening those muscles of perceptional awareness. The emphasis is on play. Everyone does better when the project is fun. No pressure. No right or rong answers. None to see but you.

As to contamination ... there are no leaks in my field. That does not mean you won't get a ping in return if you ping my field. You just won't get any infos, and I take rigorous care of my field. No unauthorized entry is permitted.

A small point of clarification: any/all are free to PM me. I won't answer questions about a live project. If you want to share your project notes after the week's project closes, I'm good with that.

Hi Focus69,

I speak briefly of personal fields in this thread:
http://afterlife-knowledge.com/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.cgi?num=1497281940

and the conversation is probably best conducted there as it does not strictly concern afterlife knowledge. We are field beings being a field.

Do you mean to ask if there is a name for receiving infos about the recently deceased, or if it is necessary to retrieve the individual's name in life? If it is the latter, no.

Probably the name for "receiving infos about the recently deceased" sounds a great deal like "receiving infos about the recently deceased."

My (new) reply as to personal fields is in this thread:

http://afterlife-knowledge.com/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.cgi?num=1497281940/0#7

Focus 69 wrote on Jun 13^th, 2017 at 12:05pm:


I trust you (personal you, Focus 69) do not feel it necessary to ask all manner of people if it is okay to participate in a volunteer project.  Be that as it may ....

As I also trust is abundantly clear, I hold no current association with TMI, its members, its programs and its goals. This is an energetic move on my part and in no way dismisses TMI.

Certainly it is possible to gather infos about a person without personal contact. In the course of the mission work our teams undertake, contact is often highly undesirable. It's likely best to leave it at that.

How one navigates these waters, by "imagination" or otherwise is not up to me. We all have our own methods. Many come to this space at ALK because Bruce's methods are effective. They are not the only ones.

And to the question: "... the no interaction rule means one are not supposed to talk with the target, right?"

My reply is: this is correct. These are information-only missions. That means no interaction with the target. No talking to the target. Take care not to be observed as you observe. I (as moderator of these voluntary projects) have been very clear: do not interact with the target. Leave his field alone. Do not enter his field. Do not tamper with his field. Do not touch or in any other way engage his field beyond the requested observation.

There are reasons for this that I trust will become clear.

Thankee sai.

Morrighan wrote on Jun 14^th, 2017 at 7:55am:



Thanks for your answer Morrighan.

Regarding the first target: I have been absent from the forum for a while but on a brief return while viewing the forum content noted the new exercise Morrighan offered.

It is not, of course, necessary for me to post my experience here, but I thought I would do so anyway. I approached the idea of this target with an open mind, and decided not to use a typical meditative process. I decided to allow the time to simply pass and to let the "moment" choose me. I simply viewed the person's picture as instructed and then let time pass. After a few days I received the following images during a few minutes of relaxation. What struck me was the dream-like nature of the experience, with no preparation. My notes regarding the closed eye vision which occurred:

"I looked down and saw “my” right hand. It did not look like my hand.  It was pale and was holding a round object with a few small round protrusions on the surface. The object did not look organic but was a cream color. It was about the size of a very small apple. The protrusions were rounded and very small, just a couple/few of them. I looked over to my left and seemed to see a few more of the objects floating in dark space. No one was holding them. I had no sense of tactile touch or sound. The image was purely visual."

This was all. There was no interaction or further pursuit of any contact. After viewing the source of the image and the information provided I have no real conclusions. However, the exercise and the simplified process was a new one for me. I would not have thought I would experience clear images and that particular accompanying feeling without setting a more specific time period aside for the process. It was interesting to notice how quickly the moment passed, and how it was generated spontaneously.

seagullresting wrote on Jun 14^th, 2017 at 1:21pm:


Yeah this is interesting because im actually wondering what could be the best method to do this exercise as i am not very fan of opening my eyes in the middle of a deep meditation to look at the picture hehe

Seagullresting, first may I ask are you "Seagull" from before? 

Also--I did not read what you've posted on this thread because I am under the impression that we are NOT sharing our results on the forum.  Isn't that everyone's understanding?

If I read your results, then it will taint my perception since I haven't done the experiment yet.  We have a week's time for each target.

What's everyone's thought about this?  We definitely need consistency and agreement between all of us!!

If you guys are sharing your results right now then I can't participate.  I need to have absolutely no preloaded info that could get in my way.

Vicky

Focus 69 wrote on Jun 14^th, 2017 at 1:21pm:


Focus 69,

Depending on what I'm trying to do, I will use different methods and means of communication.  Think of ANY method as being a "means of communication". 

If I want to do some work on an energy level and be noninvasive, then I use my method I described above.  In essence it's me communicating with someone else via my spirit and their spirit.  The use of that "channel" only means to me that I myself as a human being (with needs, wants, emotions, limited perception, etc). is not infringing unfairly on someone else.  I view my Guidance as having a much greater line of sight than me.  For instance, my Guidance knows the future, I don't.  My Guidance knows what the outcome of my actions will be, I don't. 

If I do want to try and make direct contact with someone, I still may not "have the power" to do that without the aid of my Guidance (higher-self, helpers, etc), or without the allowance of the other person's spirit.  This to me is just being polite.  It's never my intention to cause harm or take advantage or impose my will on another person.

I think you're really overthinking the "helper" concept, and that's ok.  It's best just to practice and see what your experience is like using a helper.  It doesn't need to work for everyone, it's just a mechanism. 

It's like this:  I've been psychic all my life.  Growing up and for many years I wondered who was responsible for giving me psychic information?  Where did it come from?  Who decided what things I get psychic information about?

Then I came to realize, understand, and accept that it doesn't matter to me "who" if anyone is responsible.  I didn't like to chalk it up to being God, angels, special spiritual beings, supreme beings, etc.  That didn't make sense to me anyway.  What made sense to me was that in the bigger picture of the totality of my consciousness, there are parts of me where that information comes from.  I don't know all those other parts of my consciousness.  For now, I am only aware of the part of my consciousness that is Vicky living this physical life right now.  But I believe that I have a greater existence that is more than this physical part of me.  I use the visual of taking a slice out of a pizza.  That one slice is me in this physical lifetime, but I am the whole entire pizza.  What those other parts are doing or what they know, I'm not sure right now.  But I trust in Me.  I trust in my higher self.  That's my belief.  That's what I use when I say "my Guidance". 

I'm also open to believing that there are other beings from other consciousnesses, who may be helping me.  Maybe dead relatives.  We can call them angels or whatever else you want to call them.  So when I use the concept of a "helper", it's not important to me "who" or "where" it comes from...other than the fact that I ALWAYS do any work in the name of being for my highest good, for the other person's highest good, and with the love, guidance, and protection that I've always known my entire life.  I've had some pretty darn amazing experiences that defy logic and physics...and I can't explain nor prove them.  But at least I know that some amazing stuff is possible in this world, in my life, and I trust that.  It's what works for me. 

Simply put, you could use the concept of a Helper in a similar way.  Think of it as You allowing yourself to receive the aid, help, and guidance of something greater than you are aware of in your present perception, and in doing so you are opening up your belief that such help and guidance is possible, helpful, from a good source, and for the best intentions.  In this way you are creating the ability to allow yourself to push past the blockage of the unknown and allowing yourself to experience things that are beyond the limits of your normal current perception.  It may really help propel you in your abilities.  Or it might not be what works for you.  All you can do is experiment.  There's no right or wrong about it. 

Appreciated.

Vicky wrote on Jun 14^th, 2017 at 2:33pm:



Yes i am agree NOT to share result here as it would spoil everything.

Yes, good to see you again, Seagull, in whatever new form.

Vicky how far you've come since we first met.

The positive reception to these projects feels good. More than once as I read discussions here it seems to me I'm reading lines from the People's Front of Judea in Life of Brian. hahaha.

Well shoot, I was way off. 

Oh well, there's always next time.

True, true.  But I still like, and need, to see my hits.  When they are there blatantly staring me in the face it's pretty darn cool!

But it's all good practice which is always useful and important. 

I will not give up!   

After Focus 69 reviewed my results and pointed something out that I had overlooked, I am recanting my previous statement of being "way off" 

Despite the rest of my notes seemingly not to describe anything that the Internet can provide verification for, there was one thing in particular I wrote down that does fit the news report about this man's death.  I wrote "Heavy weight on chest", and since this man was crushed to death when an elephant fell on top of him I'd say that definitely qualifies as a hit.

It's a reminder to me what Bruce has taught me, that even though you may have lots of information that's wrong or that doesn't provide verification, it doesn't make the one thing that is valid any less important.  It's more important to find what fits instead of what doesn't, especially as you're developing your skills and learning how your own perception works for you.

Thanks Focus 69!

Perfect miss for me as far as i am concerned, even if as you say Morrighan, maybe i collect hits on other dimensions of the personality of the target... (which is maybe the case actually as me and Vicky share one troubling identical recurrent vision on this week target)

Ingenuous question; what is or what would be the exercise which creates the most high percentage of chance to check and validate some perceptions one receive ? Maybe synchronous partnered exploration like retrievals for example or anything would produce a better "return/output" for our goal ?

It's the "niggle", as one friend states. It's about a certain discernment between the feeling one has when one becomes aware of "heavy weight on chest" and other infos. Yes these exercises are practice in discernment.

Focus 69 wrote on Jun 18^th, 2017 at 12:06pm:



Bruce's published work is a breadcrumb trail of his personal journey from skeptical inquirer to experienced explorer.

It's just a story. Create your own story. Write your own story as your story writes you.

Morrighan wrote on Jun 18^th, 2017 at 10:23am:



Sorry for the delay but could you tell me what do you mean here please ?: "The "vibration" to be cleared runs on much deeper levels of being, and this may account for any "non-hits" one may or may not believe received this week."