All events are synchronous.   

What about you seagull; will you volunteer a synchronous event that you have noticed? I expect you have noticed some.

seagull wrote on Oct 10^th, 2015 at 10:42am:

Thanks. Yes I know you asked first but I was curious.

Those you mentioned are personal things, and it seems they came at the right time too.

I will probably put up a post about it later. 

Well, Bruce did say he was enjoying the ride.

I liked your story. Maybe she was a spirit guide.

Aww...1796, what a lovely example. 

During times when I spend a lot of time meditating, I notice more synchronous events happening.  I think it happens more often than we realize, it's just that we don't allow ourselves to become aware enough to notice.

I do pay attention when events follow each other in a seemingly magical succesion. Succesion I've found can also be magically bad, and that I take as an indication it's about time to review my decisions. I do also think that random incidents happen: http://tinyurl.com/ojrpuby

1796 wrote on Oct 12^th, 2015 at 10:16am:

No worries, you make great waffles.

Quote:


Ah, with no ducks on the board I love the sound of my own countrymen conversing freely. Its music to the ears.

  Yes, many.  Some or many seemed to be guidance confirming things about deeper issues. I don't think we manifest events so much as pre agree to certain events (before this life and/or in our nonphysical awareness--especially dream state) and/or our intuition picks up on things ahead of times and so nudges us in certain directions ahead of times.

  But, i agree with Albert that sometimes coincidences are sometimes just that, coincidences. Occasional random events and similarities. 

  Probably the most powerful for me was the following:  Had a dream when 16 about being in a huge library viewing a man i knew to be part of myself in a larger sense. This self/aspect of our larger self was talking to an older, very wise seeming person, who handed this self a book. 

  When this self opened up the book, i as an outside observer and also experienced it as the other man, and we watched a "movie" unfold. As we watched, we became aware that the character in the "movie" was also a part of our larger self. As we watched, we became immersed in it and relived the experience to some extent. 

   It was early pioneer American time period. This past self was a trapper looking white guy, trudging through the forest. A bear mauled him pretty badly, but did not kill him.  A half Native American, half Caucasian healer lady found him and nursed him back to life. The woman seemed unusually psychic/tuned in and could communicate well with animals and nature in general.

   At some point, we disengaged from the scenes and the wise, old man in the "library" closed the "book" and looked at this other self within our Disk, said his last name, and then said, "don't you think you had the knowledge within you at the time?" 

   I remember distinctly the self in the library feeling a sense of almost mild, self critical chagrin (which i felt through him). 

  Fast forward about a decade later, I was new on an astrology forum.  I became friends pretty quickly with a woman on there, whom come to find out we had many coincidences and similarities with.  She was also deeply interested in Edgar Cayce's work, and though we were now living 600 miles apart, she lived about 10 mins. away from where my grandparents lived and where i spent a good chunk of my highschool years living at. 

   About a couple months or so into our online friendship, her husband died from an accident on the job (so it was very out of the blue and sudden for her). They were very close, and she became very despondent and depressed. I felt very strongly that i should try to be there for her and help her through this time. Spent much time on the phone listening to her and trying to focus her away from the intense heaviness.  Would also pray and meditate with her in mind.  I felt an unusually deep and intense sense of duty/obligation to her for some reason. 

    Awhile later, i was planning on making a visit to my home state for family and friends, and we decided to meet up in person since she would be very close to where i would be staying a portion of the time. 

   While we were sitting together in a public place conversing, that dream from a decade ago flooded into my awareness strongly, along with some extra info i didn't remember.  I knew very strongly that my friend was part of the same Soul or rather Spirit that had had the life of the half Native American, half Caucasian healer woman that had nursed my Disk's other self back to life in the dream. What was extra was that i now knew that after this, we had a romantic relationship, and that i ended up hurting her a lot emotionally in that life.

  I didn't know whether or not i should tell about all this, so i decided to just feel it out some first.  I asked her about her views and thoughts towards Native American culture, healing, early pioneer time, etc. After saying she had definite interests in a lot of those areas (and feeling nudged to), i decided to more fully open up (i did not tell her the identity of the man in the library). 

   After telling her all that, i could tell that she was visibly affected.  She took a little time to collect herself, and started telling me that years ago one of her friends and her first spiritual mentor, an older woman, decided to give her a unique birthday gift.  Her older friend was friends with a lady that use to be connected to the A.R.E and use to give past life readings. 

   The sensitive was retired from this, but she called her up and asked her if she would do a reading for our mutual friend.  She agreed and during the reading, two main lives were focused on, one was a Greek life, and the other was when she was a half Native American, half white woman who was a healer and a sensitive during early American pioneer time.  She became involved with a white, Euro man, and he hurt her a lot.  The sensitive said at the end, you two have unfinished business together and will meet again later in this life to work it out. 

    We were both pretty blown away by all of this.  Me more so than even her, because i became aware that these lifetimes were also outlined in Edgar Cayce's work. I was somewhat aware of the trapper guy's life after the dream, but i wasn't fully aware of all the other connections until after this synchronistic event, as i went back to the Readings and delved deeper.  Much of it was very similar.  The only thing that wasn't mentioned in the Cayce Readings, was the English guy getting mauled by a bear.

  It explained why i felt such a strong sense of obligation and responsibility to her, and i think was why we met when we did, not long before her trial of losing her husband. As she had nursed my other self back to life in that past life, i tried to in a sense nurse her back to life this time around.

   Interestingly, after she started to come out of the gloom and depression of that trial, we parted ways on good terms.

  I came away from the experience knowing that karma is very real, and that guidance definitely does use synchronicity at times to confirm/verify information received in other ways. 

  Often, when we first start to wake up to the larger reality at first, we need strong, in our face experiences like these to really receive and accept information we get from our Expanded self and/or Guidance level's.  As we grow and mature, we tend to trust more and become more aware, intuitive, and accepting of the process or of info received. So we tend to need less overt confirmations. 

  Interestingly, when Edgar Cayce's son, Hugh Lynn, had his first Life Reading (which he didn't seek or ask for, but was given as a present), and was told that he had been the Disciple Andrew, he became very upset with his father and also strongly bucked against the idea of reincarnation in general. 

  Over time and some strong experiences and synchronicities of his own, he came to accept reincarnation/karma as truth (as he later sought other Life Readings and also spoke about these concepts some after his father died), and presumably accepted the source(s) of the Readings statement that he had been the disciple Andrew.  Like his father, he also had a very strong attraction to Yeshua as a Teacher.  (Edgar supposedly had been one of the 70 or 72, less Hebrew/more gentile disciples sent out into the gentile world to preach/example in his name).

  I should probably add that it probably depends on the individual to some extent. If say you're a less mature Soul incarnating here, you probably don't have a lot of specific goals and tasks to work on. 

   You're probably more, "anything goes" and want to experience the randomness of the physical. Kind of like a kid in a candy store or Chuck E Cheese, constantly distracted by new scents, colors, sounds etc.

  But as you grow and become more organized, coherent, your spiritual will and focus becomes stronger, you may opt for lives that are more purpose driven and oriented. You start to tune out the noise and distractions, and focus more on growth and service.

Greater planning and creating more mutual inter-contracts goes on before you incarnate.  Such a Soul will tend to experience more meaningful synchronicity both because of the greater degree of planning and organization that went on before their life, and because they also pay attention more to such developments and patterns (being more aware/perceptive in general), as sign posts along the way.

   So it's probably relative to the individual to an extent.   

Quote:


I am pleased for you that it has been helpful.

To provide encouragement and clarity are the two reasons I am here.


***

Growing in self control and self governance is not easy for anyone. Everyone who takes up the challenge will enter into struggle with themselves and experience both successes and disappointments. Often those who gain the most mastery are those who have made the most mistakes, and those who are currently making mistakes may well be on their way to being masters of that problem in the future. The emotional nature is particularly difficult to master, but it can be mastered, as can the rest of our being. Despite the difficulties that arise to meet us when we step out on the path to self governance and self knowledge, the rewards are well worth all the pain and suffering. To the responsible and self accountable reader, look back at the great mistakes you have made and hardships you have experienced in your life, have they not also been your greatest lessons from which you have grown the most. Have they not given you more understanding of life and of self than any book could have given you. Surely you would not exchange your past hardships for your old ignorance. Books, teachings, meditations, are all only complimentary aids to the real learnings of life. It is by living trial, work, results and practice that we prove theory and turn information into knowledge and growth. To anyone who is struggling with themselves, I say, keep up the good work, keep getting up and soldiering on. Have faith in yourself and in God. Victory will be had.

Like everyone I have experienced a wide variety of hardship, and through my work I have met with those who have experienced the most. I could tell hundreds of stories of horrific human sufferings, every word true, and would achieve nothing more than to get myself banned from this forum because those stories are too ugly and offensive to be believed or tolerated by "good" people. I have witnessed over and over again, without exception, that those who learn and grow the most are those who forgive, and who extract the lessons from the experience, and are thankful in their heart for those lessons. 

Quote:


  This probably is why direct, literal reincarnation of a self back to earth seems much less common than multiple Disk projections of relatively new selves.

  I suspect that those, especially those more sensitive and aware, feel after directly experiencing them, that earth-human lives tend to be rather difficult and challenging, and it's not something these will engage in lightly again.

  Unless you're one of the oblivious, earth-material power/hedonist addicts that cycle in and out constantly.

Hopefully being reconnected with Source, God, however you put it, is the most fulfilling way of being there is. What's the alternative? Golf? 

But what if you walk the entire race, and then you get disqualified for illegal form at the end?

I have a history as a Track and Field fan.

When Vicky mentioned a runner's name in her book, I knew who that runner is (not personally).

Quote:

  Also, there are always exceptions to the rule, or is it, the exceptions tend to prove the rule..?

   It's pretty hard to prove any of this kind of stuff to anyone else. The closest thing to proof in these areas, besides one's own repeating experiences, are core similarities found between diverse and unrelated reputable sources. If for example, 6 different reputable psychic sources say something similar, chances are, there is probably something to the essential concept (by reputable, i mean coming from a predominantly positive/helpful source AND having some material world verification in relation).

Quote:


  Think you'll find various people will have a different take on the above based on experience, including myself and Bruce Moen.  Bruce has met and befriended two other selves from his own Disk--one a man (Bob Monroe) and the other a female. As mentioned, my dream confirmed this for me.

  Interestingly, besides various confirmations experienced in relation to dreams, even the Bible generally speaks quite positively of dreams as a form of guidance.  Some of the major figures in same, were also active dreamers and interpreters of other's dream.  It is one of the forms of guidance most spoken of in a consistently positive sense. 

   Anyways, i was briefly acquainted with two other selves from my own immediate Disk, but both are now in the nonphysical. One, a male slightly younger than me and whom i met in high school died in a car crash.  The other, a woman, was much older than myself.   

  I'm married to my "Twin Soul", which is a slightly different connection than i had with the two people i just referenced.  There are different levels of Disk.  What i view as Twin Souls, are two distinct, freewilled Disks that were originally part of the same larger Disk or Spirit.  When they both project a self into the Earth system at the same time, then we can say they have a Twin Soul relationship. 

  Because the physical, and especially the Earth, is based on polarization and imbalance, when we became involved with Earth and human lives, we eventually and naturally separated into two parts of a Whole, one with a slight emphasis on the masculine and one with a slight emphasis on the feminine.   

    In other words, a lot of her lives, are not directly part of my own immediate Disk and experience. For whatever reason, she has had a majority of female lives and i've had a majority of male lifetimes.  Yet, interestingly, i suspect that originally when we split, i was the more Yin/feminine polarized part of the larger self and she was the more Yang/masculine polarized part.  

Some of our pre-Earth/Solar system lives and selves were/are part of the same self.  These were as more androgynous or rather mixed/blended beings, as the form reflected better the inner consciousness in some of these systems.  Our earliest projection into the Earth were in similar forms.  But at that point, we were fully One, not distinct Disks.  Today, we have an odd admixture of a great degree of innate harmony, and yet some oppositional tension, which is very well reflected in our astro. charts and comparison of same. All our major points are all either in the same Sign/positions or in the opposite. I'm a Cap. Sun & Merc., she is a Cap Rising cusping Aquarius. I have Leo Rising and Aquarius Venus, she is Aquarius Sun, Venus, and South Node. I have Libra Moon, she has Aries Moon with her ruling planet in Libra, along with Libra Jupiter, i have a number of Virgo points (North Node, Jupiter, Mars, and Saturn), and she has Mercury and Mars in Pisces. So literally, all the major and personal points are opposite or same as the other's different, but highly connected points (which is usually more significant and stronger than the same placements being opposite or same e.g. Aquarius Sun with someone with Leo Sun, is less bonding and indicative than Aquarius or Leo Sun with a person with Leo or Aquarius Rising). 

  I've seen a lot of different chart comparisons, and this degree of powerful, mutual interconnection is more rare than common, though you will always find some major conjunctions and oppositions between charts of people whom are close.

   So it seems a little more complex and relative than some give it credit for. As often life and reality are as compared to belief systems of the huge, huge majority of humans (including this self at times no doubt).   

   Larger and more accurate truths tends to be internally consistent in a larger, holistic logic sense i.e. from various different angles of perception and consideration.

A group of friends formed by oversouls equals the opportunity to meet one/more extensions from that group on Earth many times over, and also the jolly possibility of meeting new extensions that can form friendships beyond the physical. But being in a group that started this journey together doesn't necessarily mean oversouls graduate, reunite and possibly meld together, before having new experiences. But some may reunite. Sometimes things change, and so can groups of oversouls, in the sense that some may follow other paths. It's good to be able to learn and practise free will both as extensions and oversouls.

Quote:

Thanks for the love, lovers of God, but no more confusion. Sorted.
 
Quote:

If the premise is wrong the conclusion can be absolutely wrong, can be absolutely right, and partly wrong/partly right. Keeping it simple and tidy, the right premise would be the right way to go.

And with definitions in mind, one model is the human physical form connected to a soul (located at monroe focus level 12) which is an extension of an Oversoul (located at focus 34 or focus 35). Another model is human physical form connected to an Oversoul which is an extension of God/Source. Other models?

In the two models above one says he or she experiences the Oversoul, which for the other he or she is God/Source.

Quote:

Depends on what freewill is in relation to? My previous post was mainly about friendships on both levels, and the option of allowing members of a group to be on their way if that was their will.

An incarnation is free to both regard and/or disregard conscience. Somebody dies in a car accident, another somebody experiences divine Oversoul intervention in a car accident. An Oversoul is active in the Earth life system, and I assume this in a simplistic way can be compared to playing golf, in the way certain rules make it the game/system we know as golf. Playing tennis there are possibilities within the limitations that define tennis.

Quote:

My will is not to answer this question. Will you do it? Is it the will of someone else?

Quote:

he he, I expected you might choose a name something like that. Thank you Loucifer for considering my request favourably. 

Quote:

Those outcomes are possible, but the statement is a rule of logic and reason, not a statement of the possibilities of chance, guesswork or of false logic or false reason.
 

Quote:

I would like to see others answer it. 

Recoverer has initiated a good start, pointing out that the oversoul's awareness includes our own awareness:
recoverer wrote on Oct 19^th, 2015 at 5:29pm:

Rhythmic walking might have an effect, however, on a limited number of occasions while walking just a few steps I've received a message either by hearing a voice or by being shown a symbolic message.

Can we call you Louie?

There is a lot of symbolism in the name and the picture.
The innocence (lamb) and the evil, and the evil being only a shadow, the result of the blockage of light. 
We are each light bearers and shadow casters; we each having light and shadow inside us.

I like the name and the picture; it suits you because you recognise the forces in yourself that range between light and shadow, and you face them, unlike many who deny them.

For anyone who doesn't know where the reference is, its in Isaiah 14. Depending on one's inclination, we might consider those verses to be historical, or prophetic, or symbolic (or a mixture) about the nature of human development and the soul's progress on Earth; the soul's coming down to earthly life/hell, individually and collectively, from God, into Earth's dust/material, darkness, lessons, illusions, puzzles and sufferings, eventually each soul to learn the lessons, solve the puzzles and find that light within and carry it home. The term Lucifer might be attributed to every man (and woman) as a potential light bearer immersed in Earth life and through the struggles of life between good and evil, the individual gradually emerges from darkness to fire up the heart and light up the soul. Similarly, through the gospels Christ often referred to the end result upon the soul of going through Earth's lessons as the coming of the "son of man" meaning the product of the human experience, what some on the forum term graduation and others term enlightenment.      

Albert,

Here's the plot twist, if you reread what you have written in your previous post, will you find that, over years of loucifuge, have been influenced by someone who is comfortable with referring to himself by that which you are not?

Here's some meditation music to go along with any potential pondering
http://tinyurl.com/pzpbg55

We humans are the fallen angels, down on Earth where we have freewill and learn and grow from our mistakes, so we are in a state where angels fear to tread.

1. Some consider the name Lucifer as a name for the Devil, like Satan.

2. Some others consider the name to be Light Bearer (its literal meaning) and representative of the potential that exists in every human being to become a light bearer after he has woken up his soul through the tests, trials and learnings of Earthly freewilled living. It therefore refers to the potential of light that is in the soul when it first comes to Earthly life but hasn't yet learnt to reveal its light / unfold its divinity. That refers to us all to varying extents.

If we read first half of Isaiah 14 we can see how both interpretations of the name have come about, because they both can be read into the passage. And if we consider that conscience is the inner light at the inner upper pinnacle of our soul, our highest sense within our self of what is good and right to do, and through which comes all divine promptings, and if we consider that the only devil we need be concerned about is that part of our self that would have us disobey our conscience, then we can see that both interpretations of the name Lucifer are related to each other.

Personally I lean most with the second interpretation, as representing the potential of light within every struggling human being on Earth, and the term son of man to represent that future state of unfolded light finally fulfilled and fully manifested in every soul after the soul has learnt and grown from its Earthly lessons. So Lucifer is like a name for a fairly ignorant soul, the term Disciple suits a  disciplined student soul actively studying on any genuine path of learning and growth, and Son of Man is like a graduate soul, fully enlightened.

But in real life (away from written internet forums like this) when conversing with others I adopt their meanings and definitions, unless they don't have one then I might suggest we use my ones. So if chatting with someone who considers Lucifer to be a name for the classical Devil then I would stick with that, for not everyone is comfortable with light and darkness or divinity and evil as existing within themselves, but prefer to externalise them onto external and influential beings/icons, and that works fine, so I accept that angle too when in conversation with them. I am comfortable being a fundamentalist or an esotericist or anything in between according to who I'm conversing with because they all have the same ideas in different form. With others I first take the fundamental/most concrete approach/interpretations and if required then work carefully up from there towards the abstract/esoteric levels and stop at the level the other person is most comfortable with and discuss it there in their own words and definitions.

Although being what many would consider some sort of astral travelling esotericist with occult knowledge, I am usually far more comfortable discussing religion and individual and human progress with fundamentalists and with atheists because their patterns of language and thought are structured and consistent, whereas most who fancy themselves as new-age/esoteric/occult/spiritual-but-not-religious etc are emotional fuzzy thinkers who can't or don't define their terms, have floating incompatible principles and fragmented incongruent compartments to their thinking. The true occultists/esotericists though, and I know quite a few, don't have such problems. They can communicate their knowledge quite clearly, but don't, except with others like themselves, otherwise they comfortably converse with others on other's own level. So in real life you can't pick 'em.                    

The way I see it, the advantage of Louie is that it is unisex. Usually male but not always. And there's a fun song to go along with it.   

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wx-8_GI4d2c

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4V1p1dM3snQ

I suppose a person can read such influence in a lot of places if he is prone to do so.

A number of years ago I was meditating one day and thinking in terms of the kundalini ascension process (I don't prefer to use that term because some questionable concepts are connected to it that come from questionable gurus). I saw a life size image of a heavy metal rocker dude. I could see Kundalini flowing within him. He used kundalini, the creative aspect of his being, for evil.

Next I saw a demonic image of myself. Next I saw the face of Jesus Christ. The point of these messages is that if I'm going to awaken my kundalini, bring my spirit energy to life, I should make certain I do so with Christ Consciousness in mind, because the creative aspect of being can be used in just about any way.

Since I can't say that I'm basking in complete Christ Consciousness, it is possible that at times the negative not Christ-like aspects come to life.






Quote:

Likely to change his name  asked: What is the effect of bringing your spirit energy to life with Christ Consciousness in mind?

Recoverer responds: I didn't run into the kundalini awakening problems that some people run into. I had some challenges, but overall things have worked out well.

I liked much of the long post, but I must wonder if, to the monkey, its life is just about swinging from trees? I imagine it is much more complex. That is like saying my devoted dog's life is just about chasing toys all day. It may seem so in certain moments, but there is much more to its relationship to my life.

It is, however, helpful to remember the fractal nature of all, which could include what might be considered synchronous.

I could make a convoluted post about recent synchronous events just in the last few days that would make little sense to anyone, but it becomes obvious that it is a real phenomenon when observed.

1796, with the below, you made some good points about kundalini. I'd like to add that some people get involved with a guru when raising their kundalini, he claims he can help them do so without problems when he can't, and then they run into problems. As you said, it best to work on one's heart so energy movement will take place as needed. Our Oversoul will also help us out with such movement.

I don't know about the many more lives part.



*********************


The crown centre is the positive pole of the soul, and the base centre is the negative pole. The crown centre is the centre through which the soul can know God or spirit; through the base centre the soul knows matter. Love, the fire, or light and warmth of God, can be drawn in through the crown and expressed through the heart. It lights the crown and warms the heart. The breath can help facilitate this. As the radiance of heart becomes the common practice and condition, so the fires of matter are automatically drawn up to it and naturally unite with it. The kundalini fires are automated in response to the heart centre, no conscious manipulation of them is required. In fact to attempt to raise or meddle with them prematurely, outside of their normal automated process is likely to cause an uncontrolled fire and destroy the mental-emotional vehicle, just as would spilling petrol from the fuel lines onto the running engine or electrics of a motorcar. As the electric, water, fuel and exhaust systems of a motorcar each have their respective channels, chambers and conduits, so too, the soul and its surrounding layers contain different circulating energies which each have their rightful pathways, centres and conduits, and if these energies get into the wrong places then destruction of the vehicle is likely to result. Most psychiatric units contain at least one person who tried to raise his kundalini, and burnt his subtle bodies and turned himself into an insane jibbering idiot, not just for this life, but for many more lives to come. Focus on the heart, on love, goodwill and helpfulness, let the automated kundalini look after itself. 

recoverer wrote on Oct 23^rd, 2015 at 11:58am:


As far as I know there is no way that a person can raise another person's kundalini. It seems illogical to me. Give some helpful suggestions perhaps. But why bother, it is all subject to the heart, and automatic from there. So the only advice need be about working the heart.

The only way to conduct high amperage electricity is through high amperage wire, otherwise the wire overheats, the insulation catches fire and the house burns down.

Only the individual can condition themselves sufficiently for high power energies to enter into and circulate through the system. And when conditioned, everything works as it should, quite naturally.

Our conditioning is up to us as individuals, no one else can do it for us.

***

Under the physical, emotional, and mental bodies is another body, that is so thin it forms the skin of the soul. For most intents and purposes it need not be differentiated from the soul, but considered the skin of the soul. It is like a sheet of cellophane over the soul. It is the foundation body; it holds one's perceived values-priorities-importances upon which one's mental-emotional body is built with all its mental-emotional tendencies (personality inclinations) which then behave in accordance with those underling values of the foundation body. We shed the mental-emotional body a while after physical death when we go through what some have termed the "second death" which is just the disintegration of the mental-emotional bodies. The foundation body remains with us, carrying over to the next life, and as the emotional and mental bodies are rebuilt as we grow up in the next life they build on top of the foundation body which is the blueprint upon which they grow. This way we have the same type of mental-emotional body (personality with all its mental-emotional tendencies) as we had the previous life, but it is a copy not the same body, so the memories contained in the previous bodies are not carried over, only the same tendencies. So then we can carry on our development from where we left off last time.

(Yes, there are memories of previous lives contained in the foundation body, and elsewhere in the soul/oversoul system, and they can be accessed when one knows how.)

There are many practices that damage the foundation body, causing it to be misshapen, burnt/scorched or torn, manifesting as insanity, and requiring a long time, often many lifetimes to repair, and one of those practices is messing about with the lower centres, particularly the base centre and kundalini.

Another practice is drug usage, like cannabis and other drugs. But that can often be rectified with healthy wholesome living.

Another practice is certain sexual practices. Some of these are common amongst the neo-pagan/witchy/spaced-out communities.   

Fortunately the human mechanism has inbuilt safe guards to prevent the base centre energies from prematurely rising, but I don't think I need describe them. So most of those people who claim to have raised their kundalini have not. They have just had some sort of spiritual or altered consciousness experience. I tend to smile politely when someone tells me they have raised their kundalini.

But, the safeguards can be bypassed. Shall I tell how? Of course not. Part of why and how I have the knowledge I have is because I can keep it secret. I use it but I don't tell it.            

What 1796 said about the foundation body, if such bodies can be created, can't they be repaired when they are harmed?

If raising the kundalini in an inappropriate way can cause a Soul problems for numerous incarnations, then perhaps it is appropriate for some people to speak up about the gurus and such who play a role in many people raising their kundalini in an inappropriate way.

seagull wrote on Oct 27^th, 2015 at 8:42am:


Of course the subtle bodies can be treated and healed, by various means. Everything takes time though. Time is the medium of change.

The more we get wrong, the more we eventually get right.

If we made no mistakes in life, if we did everything right, then we would be no wiser at our life’s end than we were at its beginning; we would leave no wiser than we arrived. There would be no purpose to living. But there is purpose to living, and that purpose crudely put is the benefit to all things of their living.

I enjoy solving problems, fixing things, being right. Who doesn't? It satisfies both the Earthly survival instinct and the soul's thirst for learning, creativity and truth. Personally I think there is only one thing better than being right and that is being wrong, because it leads to being right.

It is healthy to doubt our self, and to be certain is healthy too, each in their place, for the health is in the knowing what to doubt and of what to be certain.

The soul cannot forgive itself, for forgiveness flows outward not inward, but the soul can forgive others, and in so doing is forgiven by forgiveness that passes through itself.

We can accept our self, though; face our self as we are.

Forgiveness is a choice, as is love. It requires some understanding, some acceptance of what it is and how it works, and then it is a choice. As is withholding it.

modo fac id

It might seem that I am contradicting myself when I say that forgiveness does not occur in a time or place of our choosing. I wondered after the last post how I could make that statement about the ease of forgiveness when in an altered state of consciousness. (I do not plan my posts here. I follow my own stream of consciousness. I do not claim to be correct, no matter how emphatic I can be on occasion.)

However, within the altered state of consciousness to which I am referring, and which I have experienced in a memorable way, there is no time or space. There was a "setting":  there is awareness, and there is love, and there is very little else. There is consciousness of the vastness of all that is, and an overwhelming sense of compassion, which extends to what is left of "self" and all others.

That part of "me" which is "self" was simultaneously smaller and larger because it entered a state of being much greater than who I am in this life -- and that is why I no longer fear death.

Regarding time, my understanding is that exists in two ways.

One, in the moment to moment way we experience while in this World.

Two, at a level of being beyond this World where we aren't limited to single and limited moments in the same way, yet we continue to exist anew, because if we stopped doing so we would stop existing.

That was a beautiful post. I am visiting my dad in sunny Florida and, as I walked out the front door to take my dog for her morning stroll a couple of hours ago, a group of around 10-15 white ibises flew directly toward me from a front yard across the street. I had startled them when I came through the door. I often see a few here in this lake district walking through the yards or flying overhead but never had a group fly right at and over my head in this way. Nicely done.