AH1976 wrote on Sep 8th, 2006 at 7:31pm:It is far to easy to be a skeptic. To believe in the afterlife, while some can have that blind 'its real because i think it is' belief, you have to research and look into it, you have to feel and open your mind, you have to be convinced. To be a skeptic all you have to do is remember one line "your wrong because I say your wrong" and that sadly is the mentality most skeptics have.
The true skeptic is the one who is actually sitting on the fence between belief/non-belief, yes/no, right/wrong etc until he himself has done that research and decided quite rightly which side he will step onto.
You took the words out of my mouth senote
I can't quite understand the mentality of so called 'sceptics' who fervently believe in nothingness and judge non physical phenomena in physical terms.
Its not like there's no evidence for life after death and its not like there's no empirical or scientific understanding of it either. Its just the competitiveness of the professional world of science, which sadly in the mainstream, does not about seem to be about earnestly testing theories but more about the reputation and credibility of the scientists. So theories which conflict with the status quo rarely see the light of day and that is why the public at large is unaware about this evidence. Fortunately for me the internet is a great liberator in allowing a free information flow.
For those sceptics who are not professors nor scientists but merely make a reputation by publicly refuting all investigations and claims of 'paranormal' phenomena, I do not have much time for. It is unlikely they would have seriously done any research on afterlife because there precious entrenched anti afterlife beliefs are so strong that they do not even analyse the evidence and rebut it, they merely subjugate it to the same biased critique time and time again.
As an open minded sceptic I have sought to self educate myself on the information on the afterlife. That meaning I need to cover all bases. Discover what research their is about consciousness, energy, the mind-brain debate as well as various empirical areas of evidence: NDE's, EVP, Direct Voice and Materialisation Mediumship. Then of course our own direct experiences through dreams, apparitions and all the different techniques that people on this site are using! That is only a few of the areas of evidence that exist!
Well I'm rambling a bit now but I would sum it up like this.
To truly be a sceptic is to gain as full an understanding as possible about the afterlife. You don't have to do it the way I've done it, Everybody will choose their own path but to be a true sceptic does not mean dismissing things out of hand and only getting one side of the argument. I've observed both the scientific materialistic world view and more recently a world view which is both empirical and scientific in approach and it supports my belief in the afterlife.
The world would be a better place if people just made the conscious decision to investigate with the will to learn and without fear of learning new things that might conflict with what they already 'know'.
As far as the afterlife evidence is concerned. The best apart from your own direct experiences might be found on Victor Zammit's website. I fully recommend listening to some of the audio tapes of the materialisation sessions.
http://www.victorzammit.com/