Hi Dora,
I would say we agree on quite a bit. As far as freewill, perhaps i didn't get my main point across, I do quite believe in it. I do believe we create, but once again while we are within this system we create within the confines of a already made creation with its own innate laws (for example like attracts like--you cannot create that out of existence Dora), and as much as we would like to believe we can alter those or all laws, but it is only by being compliant with them do we "pass go". This is hard to take for those who have a strong self-will and powerful self-awareness. This is shown in the pattern of Yeshua, and as the E.C. readings state anyone who tries to climb up any other way is naught but a thief. Or, to put in more modern terms, PUL is the only way to ultimate creation or creativeness. I don't mean this in religious way, never have been, but rather in a practical pragmatic way that Seth, just in my opinion (and i know i could be off) lacks.
If Seth talked more about PUL and the power of it, I would respect him more, but he seems (as do many mental entities) quite obsessed with the fact that we can create. Nothing wrong with that ultimately, but it will not lead to full Oneness unless one aligns to the creative forces, which is what I would like to remember and more importantly express purely.
Dora wrote, "I understand that many people align with the metaphysical, or religious beliefs, willing to believe that when the life goes well, then yes, they accept that it created by the individual, but when something objectively doesn't go well, then it become the expression of the "karma" or "gods will" or "accidents"- or even the "pre-destined path" (no offend intended to any of those beliefs, )"
Nah, don't subscribe to any of those belief systems either. Besides, perhaps i interpret Karma differently than you, to me it is nothing but creative expression, not good, not bad, but as many energy reactions show, it has its cause and it has its effect. For me, the way through Karma is pure love and detachment from all reactions to Karma, or in other words self-detachment. This doesn't necessarily negate Karma, but it then doesn't have any power over you. No matter what you put forth and express, it will come back its just like attracts like--an attribute of that energy that was here before you or i even existed in a individualized consciousness.
Dora wrote, "so the answer to your question is NO I cannot project energy different then I am..."
I totally agree 100 percent. Yet i would add a twist. No one attains higher than their ideals in life. No matter how much you believe in any particular belief system whether espoused by Seth, Cayce's Source(s), Yeshua, Buddha, Elias, me, you, etc., it will get you no where vibrationally speaking unless by expressing/creating in alignment with your highest spiritual ideals. The highest ideal anyone individual soul can have, i would argue, is PUL. The very stuff that allows you to create in the first place, the very stuff that made it possible for you, I and everything to come into existence.
Dora wrote, "Well, I have to say that your comment make me or maybe I'm not informed correctly but in my knowledge Cacey is disengaged quite sometimes, who's experiences, writing, teachings, and beliefs you seems like to take as a grain of salt, as the ultimate truth.... "
Well hurumpp! LOL, since you *attacked* my belief systems (i'm quite joking) i will have to defend my precious ego belief system beliefs. No i do not believe Cayce has the ultimate truth, or covers everything. He was in touch, for the most part, with the purely Universal Sources, those that Monroe contacted nearing the Apperature, those who are "completed". This is why Cayce has been unique compared to many mediums or channels. Cayce's work was described in one reading as the "work of the Masters of Masters". Is Seth of a faster vibration than such? Jane Roberts was in touch with but an indivualized essence--not necessarily faster in vibration than your soul or mine. Also, how much has Roberts been validated and verified in the real world, whereas the Cayce material speaks for itself in its long history of helpfullness and independent verifications. Besides, the truth comes in the doing, the experiencing, not in the believing...Hey just like your little usual end quote!
Also, if i took Cayce's Sources as the so called "ultimate truth" why would i have read and loved Monroe's books, Bruce's books, Rosiland's book (her new book maybe you could gain something from), so many others, and why the heck would i be here when i could stick to my hallowed Cayce sites with everyone being a Cayce-ite too? Why would i not just bash Seth and such, i'm not particularly concerned with what people here think of me? I try to see the good in his material, even though in my eyes there are *red flags* around the Seth material.
One very blatant example: I read in a Seth book a bit about some so called historical knowledge (I believe it was "Seth Speaks"). In his little dissertion of the life of Yeshua, Seth says that Yeshua did not go to the cross to die, that he didn't *need* to die, and that they picked a false Christ who was somewhat popular around the time, drugged him and he was the one crucified. Yeshua made off scott free alive. So we have no crucification of Christ, and certainly no resurrection right?
This is contrary to much scientific, historical information and verified objective facts, as any well trained and knowledgable biblical scholar will tell you. This is very contrary to the ENTIRE theme, purpose, structure of the Cayce readings which have been time and time again histortically verified in many departments whether through or by health, changes, historical facts, degree of helpfullness, and sheer immensity of books written based on such concepts etc. Whatever Cayce was, he was certainly good at reading the Akashic.
This is also quite contrary to all the very scientific evidence for the Turin Shroud. Just ignoring all that evidence--interesting factoid: Cayce gave a reading back in the early 30's about the physical appearance of Yeshua. One of the details was that he would have weighed at least 170 lbs. The scientifically trained expert, who much later was to work on reconstructing the physical profile of the man on the cloth, said that to the best approximation that this man would have weighed...what...drum roll please...170 lbs. What a coinkydink?
Then you also have Monroe and his 1800 yr old buddy, which in Monroe's wording seemed to be known in some manner, "occidental", "no one really believes you exist" etc. Oh yeah, did i mention he was at least 1800 years old and all of Yeshua's disciples (real historical people), and the Cayce readings say that Yesh died then resurrected his body to a form (physically immortal Light form) that Seth couldn't even be able to comprehend, able to shift through any dimension at will, even with physical attributes. Hmmm... yet another coinkydink. Yet there are more examples. Rosiland Mcknight's guides firmly recognize that Yeshua functions from the light body, and they even go so far as to refer to him as the highest vibratory being to come to earth.
But all of this, and more could just be wrong or just my belief system, i suppose. I think we would both agree that in the end, they're just beliefs and individual perceptions...
In PUL
P.S. A little challenge: from reading your posts, i would say that you and I both believe that everything is energy, and that matter is just disguised pure energy, or a similar sentiment? Then in both of our belief systems, for example, there really is no difference between walking on water than on cement right... both are just varying vibrations of Pure Light energy? So with this belief firm in your mind, go out to a lake and walk on the surface of the water (lol, not frozen ice water).
If your beliefs create your reality, and since you know better, you should be able to do it according to your belief system? Betchya you can't no matter what you believe... this is the missing ingredient of why you can't and won't. I can't either, but i know the missing ingredient, i just got to work on expressing it to the point of a certain personage--for example. Got to speed up your total vibrations to a the fastest vibration there is if you want your reality to follow your beliefs and creating in such an example.
Home
Pages: 1 
