Morrighan
Super Member
Offline
Multidimensional Navigator
Posts: 505
Isle of Everywhere
Gender:
|
Humor now seen, Uno. Yep.
While it is true that I was born into a line of healers, it is also true that I declined entry into the profession. That does not mean I did not learn from my family; my father in life was a most respected pioneer in his chosen medical field. That's his life and not mine.
In my own work with clients, I do not proceed until my client grants me explicit permission to look at their field; and their agreement that should any shift in their field occur it is entirely their responsibility and not mine.
To the first point: it is my view that another person's field is, shall we say, private property? To put it another way, I may view someone's house from a public street. It is widely agreed that we ask permission to enter that house. That's what doorbells are for.
For me, picking up on someone else's field is as natural as [your favorite metaphor]. It's a mixed blessing. Picking up on some is a bit like walking into a municipal dump to find a dead skunk. So I take some care in my daily life not to tune in too closely unless there is a need. This is, in part, how I do sometimes misread posts. It's because I am being careful with my own field. I find it disconcerting to read the YouTube comments of the landscape of life.
When I do engage, that's a professional agreement. When I close the field at end-of-session, the field is CLOSED. This is not only for my well-being but for my client's as well.
As stated elsewhere and repeated here for clarity, I find it vital to to tell if someone is usurping multi-dimensional frequencies for their own power. Equally, it is vital to tell if we are usurping multi-dimensional frequencies of others for our own power.
Which brings me to the second point regarding a doctor's/healer's relationship with the patient. To me, it's another savior-victim energetic and I won't buy into it. Cowboys need indians. Cops need robbers. White supremacists need people of color.
Thus I do not begin a session without an agreement that if any healing takes place it is entirely the client's doing and client's responsibility. Not the same model that shamans use. Or, not any shamans I've met.
What I observe that occurs in the course of a session (distinct from my mission work and distinct from anything I do here) begins with the agreement that I report only what I see and make no effort to change the individual, heal the individual or make things better.
I am always more surprised than my client at what transpires. It can be anything.
Which is not the point.
At question is the reclamation of what one might call "personality shards". That's inaccurate but will need to do for now. What I observe is being present to what asks to be seen. Sometimes this may be an aspect of self that has been left behind.
To be continued ....
|