Copyrighted Logo

css menu by Css3Menu.com


 

Bruce's 5th book, a Home Study Course, is now available.
Books & Tapes by Bruce Moen
    Bruce's Blog now at http://www.afterlife-knowledge.com/blog....

  HomeHelpSearchLoginRegister  
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Questions Concerning Ego (Read 5008 times)
Yvvak
New Member
*
Offline


ALK Member

Posts: 34
Questions Concerning Ego
Feb 27th, 2014 at 4:46pm
 
During my readings of the various posts on the forum, I've come across several references to the dissolution of either aspects of or the entirety of the Ego, and this concept is a confusing one for me to grasp. I hit a wall in understanding due to the fact that I have a hard time differentiating Ego, identity and personality, which may be a result of me not having much of a personality. When I say "lack of personality", I mean that I often look at things from a very analytical perspective and have very little emotional or moral opinion on the events I observe, but this may be a personality of its own and I am simply misunderstanding the concept. So, my actual questions are these:

What constitutes the Ego? Is there a difference between Ego and identity? If so, how are they different? how does personality factor into the equation?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
2bets
Junior Member
**
Offline


ALK Member

Posts: 51
SE USA
Gender: female
Re: Questions Concerning Ego
Reply #1 - Feb 27th, 2014 at 5:21pm
 
You'll probably get a variety of answers to your questions, Boheric,
because even the originators of psychology differ from each other on how they use these terms.
Maybe we could say generally that identity emphasizes more of how others see you as an individual from the outside and ego is an inner need to be an individual that stands out from all the rest --? (IMO anyway.)

Surely being analytical is a valid quality to have. Our society couldn't exist without having analytical qualities and that would come from individuals. In an individual "being hard on yourself" could be also be being overly-analytical.

And then much of morality varies with what time period and country you live in. Even the basic "Do no harm" can mean different things depending on what "harm" means. I think consenting boxers harm each other, but maybe you don't.

Those are big questions.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Ginny
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 259
Wa
Gender: female
Re: Questions Concerning Ego
Reply #2 - Feb 27th, 2014 at 8:37pm
 
Hi Boheric,

When I was looking into different religions and alternative beliefs many years ago I always seemed to encounter a vein of what felt to me to be self-denial running through them, a need for supression or dislike of the ego. Being human or the acquiring of a human ego was somehow unfortunate or supposedly a consequence of having done something wrong...and the less you had the better your chances of 'escaping' something. Maybe living through an abundance of negativity and criticism in my childhood was a heavy influence, but I just couldn't go along with the belief that I was innately bad or flawed because of the human ego.

I don't know if these books would be of interest to you, but they helped clear the fog for me regarding ego, identity: Seth Speaks; Robert Monroe's 3 books; Bruce Moen's 5 books.

What I came away with was that ego is a fundamental of being human, even something sought after, to add to and enrich our ever-expanding true selves. The many facets of the human ego offer a bonanza of knowledge and experience.

And about your personality--you're unique, be yourself. There are too many people running around trying to be like everyone else--gets old Wink.



Much love,

Ginny
Back to top
 

"Intelligence is knowing that which is important." Albert Einstein
 
IP Logged
 
DocM
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 2168
Re: Questions Concerning Ego
Reply #3 - Feb 27th, 2014 at 10:56pm
 
We all have our own definitions to communicate with for the terms "ego" and "soul" - of course that matters.  Here are mine:

  I do believe in individual uniqueness.  However, I think our soul is that part of us which is the "real us," a multidimensional part of God.  I believe that our soul incarnates in the flesh into a human being.  The ego is then created when the person (body and soul) is born, and raised and trained to defend the person in the physical world.

The ego to me is the outer training and trappings of a person.  That which is programmed to help with the survival of the individual in the physical world.  The soul is limitless; the ego is defined.  The real us, the soul is beyond needing this.  As such, the ego tends to be useful in earthly situations, but it seeks constant praise and sustenance and is afraid of being extinguished - anything which does not support the ego makes it fear for its own death.  The soul is eternal, and has no such fear.  The soul recognizes itself as part of God, and the human experience as a virtual reality game (as Kathy calls it) designed to explore separation from God and the unity of all things. 

The ego is a fearful defense mechanism glued to the human mind which operates on the belief that it is the true person and that there is no God, and its only concern is for survival of the physical human being and itself.  The ego reacts out of judgement and by judging as it has a kill or be killed mentality.  Have a point of view?  "Mine is right!" says the ego.  The ego has to win or be right because to let down it's guard means to perish. 

Those who have written about and reached enlightenment, from Jesus to Buddha, speak of getting in touch with your soul while losing the ego.  Initially, I thought this was a nihilistic approach.  I see now my initial lack of understanding.  If the ego dissolves when we get in touch with our true self/soul, we do not dissolve into the universe.  We are just as unique as we appear to be.  But we are free of the baggage that comes with a self-centered outer layer of "kill-or-be killed" that the ego brings.

The soul works on the principle of love and selflessness.  The ego works on the principle of survival and selfishness.  Once we get in touch with our inner selves (soul) and observe the ego, we leave the madness and turmoil/karma that is attached to that form of consciousness.  Heartache, grief, anxiety all come from the interaction of our ego with others in the physical world.

Without ego, there is acceptance, forgiveness, and calmness.  People describe this state as a combination of alertness and bliss. 

This is not to say that there is nothing good about the ego.  Only that after a point in our lives, it acts to hold us back into repetitive patterns of self-centered action.  We must transcend this at some point to regain the bigger picture of our souls. 

My take on the ego, for what it is worth

Matthew
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
a channel
Ex Member


Re: Questions Concerning Ego
Reply #4 - Feb 28th, 2014 at 12:16am
 
  Hi Boheric,

  Probably your best bet would be to meditate under more ideal conditions and ask this question of your guidance.  For me, more ideal conditions would be to state something like, I deeply desire and ask to connect to only the most expanded, PUL attuned, helpful, creative consciousnesses.  I deeply desire and ask for their help and guidance. 

  Then practice Bruce's remembering and feeling of Love exercises. 

    Then get still and centered and listen, after asking your question(s). 

    One of the more interesting takes on ego, is something i recently re-read from an author named Rosalind A. McKnight.   Rosie, as some knew her as, was one of Bob Monroe's earlier and long time explorers.  She was a very good explorer.  Many years after her experiences with Bob and her guidance, she wrote two books, "Cosmic Journeys" and "Soul Journeys". 

    Rosie and i were friends.  We talked via email for awhile.  We also met up a couple of times for dinner.  She was one of those people that you meet, that if you have any sensitivity, you know she was an "old soul".   She died a couple year or so back. 

  Anyways, in her 2nd book, she writes about meeting a kind of helper whom she labels "Radiant Lady".   Later on in the book, she finds out that Radiant Lady is an Elder, and was on her council for arranging her incarnation as Rosalind.  Elders are extremely mature and developed consciousnesses, and have a lot of responsibility and authority in the nonphysical.

   Here is what Radiant Lady says about the ego, and i'm sharing it because it's one of the most interesting and unique ways i've heard any spiritual source talk about it. 

   Rosie to Radiant Lady, "Well, where does the ego come in?  The ego gets a lot of bashing around here on Earth as something that often works against the good of the human being." 

   Radiant Lady responds, "That's because the purpose of the ego is not clearly understood on the Earth plane.  God would not give you something that is not useful..."

Rosie, "....But what is the purpose of the ego." 

Radiant Lady, "The ego is a very important part of the energy of the physical body.  Because the physical plane is so intense, the ego acts as a shield or protector for the human personality that is innate within the soul/spirit.  That is, it reflects these emotions back to the world as it checks 'thought ID's'.  It often gets a bad rap because it becomes associated with the lower emotions.  But the ego is not a negative emotion, but an energy that is stronger than any emotion, functioning like a parental protector of the human personality as well as the soul/spirit that resides within the personality."

   Rosalind, "I'm not sure i completely understand what you are saying Radiant Lady..."

  Radiant Lady, "...But the human ego is not part of your soul/spirit body because we have no need to have such protection in a world where there is no conflict and where only Love exists.  The personality survives the death of the physical body, but the ego does not." 


  From my own experience, i've come to learn and think that too many spiritual sources focus too much on the "ego", and demonize it too much.   Rather, i've learned, that the more you focus on PUL and build that up within, the more it automatically brings the ego part of us into balance and alignment with the soul/spirit parts. 

   Making the ego the enemy tends to facilitate polarization and imbalance some.   I know of some spiritual sources that spend more time talking about ego than they do about what we do want and are trying to build. 

   This doesn't mean that we don't observe and watch for those aspects of self and those thoughts and feelings which are negative and limiting.  Course we need to pay attention to these to be aware of self and what self needs to change or work on.  But more focus needs to be on that which helps and transforms imo. 

   It is what i would call, a positive, directive focus, with the emphasis on what helps and heals, rather than so much focus on the problem or what we are trying to get away from. 

  It's the same principle in hypnosis, suggestions, and the subconscious mind.   If someone is afraid of water and wants to get over this fear, a good hypnotherapist will not give a suggestion to a person like, "you are not afraid of water anymore."  Nor, "water is not scarey anymore."

  But rather they would phrase it in a more positive and directive manner, "Anytime you are in water, you feel safe, strong, centered and courageous." 

  The focus is on the change or reality you want, not the issue you are trying to get away from.  It is similar with ego and spiritual growth.  Focus more on PUL and all that which is creative and constructive in nature, and this will help more than anything else. 

As far as transforming limiting parts of self, these come more in more specific aspects rather than a generic force we call ego.  For each person, their limiting and negative aspects are a bit different.    It's more helpful to work on these as individual aspects than lumping them all together under one generalized concept. 

  For some, it might be more anger and impatience.  For others, it may be laziness and procrastination.  For some, it may be over emotional sensitivity or criticism of others, for others it might be a specific limiting belief, etc, etc. 

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
seagull
Senior Member
****
Offline


ALK Member

Posts: 269
land sea sky
Gender: female
Re: Questions Concerning Ego
Reply #5 - Feb 28th, 2014 at 8:18pm
 
I'm no specialist in such matters as ego, and never really use the word. However, I guess I see it as the part of us which says "I am I" and which helped us establish, as we grew from babies into adulthood, a sense that "you are you and I am I" and the ability to see ourselves as separate from our surroundings, so that we can learn basic skills in the physical world.

I think it is the part of us that puts ourselves on pedestals or underneath them, comparing ourselves to others, supporting our often misguided views of who we are. When people talk about subduing the ego, I think that is what they are talking about--learning how to let go of that tendency a little bit so as to experience a more expanded and, really very pleasant, different view of "all that is" as being one, interconnected, in a profound sense.

Personality I see as our life experiences combined with our genetic and cultural heritage, which creates a distinct identity which has likes and dislikes, certain kinds of knowledge, etc.

I believe that when we discard our earthly bodies, after we have experienced what we come here to do, we have a different kind of personality in the afterlife. Just as we do at 2, 5, 10, 20, 30, 50 years of age. We expand more into ourselves, become more of who we are, let go of more false ideas of who we are, become more free, etc. That's about all I understand on that subject.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Yvvak
New Member
*
Offline


ALK Member

Posts: 34
Re: Questions Concerning Ego
Reply #6 - Mar 1st, 2014 at 8:04pm
 
So from what I gather, there is a difference between identity and Ego, and even personality seems to fall out of the reach of Ego. One more question: How does one determine the strength/ effect of one's Ego? Perhaps if I had some indicators, I could better identify my Ego.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
seagull
Senior Member
****
Offline


ALK Member

Posts: 269
land sea sky
Gender: female
Re: Questions Concerning Ego
Reply #7 - Mar 2nd, 2014 at 12:51pm
 
Thank you for all your great questions. Here's my guess.

Ego = sense of struggle. No ego = sense of ease, understanding, peace, ability to detach and let go. There is a place where you are standing between the two. Can you judge for yourself where it is?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
recoverer
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 5027
Gender: male
Re: Questions Concerning Ego
Reply #8 - Mar 2nd, 2014 at 4:18pm
 
Boheric:

Everybody on this thread provided good responses.

Perhaps this article that I wrote in some way relates.

http://nondualityisdualistic.com/articles-2/jeff-foster-advaita-vedanta-and-nond...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Yvvak
New Member
*
Offline


ALK Member

Posts: 34
Re: Questions Concerning Ego
Reply #9 - Mar 4th, 2014 at 3:23pm
 
I would like to thank all of you for your responses. They have helped me to better understand the concept of the Ego and clear up a great deal of my concerns on the matter.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Alan McDougall
Super Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 2104
South Africa
Gender: male
Re: Questions Concerning Ego
Reply #10 - Mar 9th, 2014 at 7:22pm
 
Yvvak wrote on Feb 27th, 2014 at 4:46pm:
During my readings of the various posts on the forum, I've come across several references to the dissolution of either aspects of or the entirety of the Ego, and this concept is a confusing one for me to grasp. I hit a wall in understanding due to the fact that I have a hard time differentiating Ego, identity and personality, which may be a result of me not having much of a personality. When I say "lack of personality", I mean that I often look at things from a very analytical perspective and have very little emotional or moral opinion on the events I observe, but this may be a personality of its own and I am simply misunderstanding the concept. So, my actual questions are these:

What constitutes the Ego? Is there a difference between Ego and identity? If so, how are they different? how does personality factor into the equation?


Hi below is my understanding of the ego,

Our human bodies are in reality just one great unit a composite entity of living interconnected integrated communicating aware cells.

Our biological bodies combined with the mind/ soul and spirit are that which reality makes us up the complete being you really are and mostly never realize and in my case I call it Alan. My ego if you like!

All human beings consist of earth bound physical parts as well as an indestructible an infinite eternal soul and spirit..

Each of us are a unique fragment a vital part of the great awareness within the grand awareness that makes up the boundless cosmos and we are bound together for eternity to maintain the balance of our colossal cosmos.

We always retain our own unique self awareness, both in this life and in the next, we are not absorbed into some cosmic soup that some people suppose.

Back to top
 

Blessings and Light

Alan McDougall
WWW <a href= <a href=  
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print


This is a Peer Moderated Forum. You can report Posting Guideline violations.