recoverer wrote on Aug 5th, 2011 at 2:33pm:Regarding Jesus, I can't say for certain, but I doubt that he ever had it in mind that people pay a lot of attention towards "him." Rather, he was interested in sharing some knowledge.
What kind of knowledge? Mainly knowledge about the value and importance of unconditional love, that the afterlife exists, and how you live your life determines what happens when you rejoin the spirit World.
I don't believe a person needs to know about Jesus in order to obtain such knowledge.
Because I had experiences with the spirit of Jesus and and have received messages about him, I went through a period of time when I felt as if I needed to let people know about him, but I no longer believe it is necessary to do so to the same extent. What's important is the truth that he represented.
Hi Recoverer,
I sort of agree with you, and yeah ultimately it's the message which is more important than the messenger. However, this is the only case that i'm aware of wherein the message and messenger were fully One and inseparable. There are many out there that teach and preach spiritual messages like unconditional love, but other than him, i don't know of another who fully lives that to the nth degree, especially when it comes to love in the pure, universal, unconditional sense.
What you wrote reminds me of what i wrote earlier:
Quote:Yeshua came to show and example what pure love and Godliness really looked like. This makes it easier for us in the clarity and power of such an example. He is also an active Guide both in the physical and nonphysical, who is always there to offer advice, suggestions, or to just share his super fast vibratory emanations with us to help uplift and expand us.
For example, i've found it's common within the New Age community and belief systems as well as various Religions, for various teachers and people to teach, example, and preach forms of subtle and not so subtle selfishness. Often this is related to materialism in some form or another. Often it is packaged in a "spiritual form".
Many have been mislead by these not so intune and love attuned teachers and examples. The reality is we tend to teach, live, perceive and example what we are and there are very, very few who are even close to being attuned to PUUL consciousness like he is.
If they looked at Yeshua's example and life, they would understand where and how they are being mislead and/or misleading.
Having been involved in the New Age scene for awhile, and having interacted with a number of people in person, and many more on forums like these, i've learned that many people out there believe and/or have a knowingness about the importance of love.
As regards more "teacher" types, yet many of these i've met who teach that love is important, also live and by their example "teach" (for it's our example which is ultimately more effecting to others), subtle and not so subtle forms of selfishness. Like i wrote in the above, often this relates to materialistic urges, tendencies, and patterns.
Isn't it a wonderful thing though, that we have Yeshua to look at, a person who truly regenerated all selfishness within and overcame the power of the world over his consciousness and choices? This is a man who gave all of himself freely with no thought of material return or reward whatsoever. This is a man who never sought to make money off his teaching and teachings (or looked for ego propping by having people become attached to him in a personality way). He quite simply didn't care a damn about money or image and really lived that. Many teachers i've run into however are still attached to this to various degrees depending on the individual.
To get these parts of his teachings, we have to look more closely at him and his life, and how he led it. Hence, people could benefit by focusing more on him. But NOT in a personality worshiping kind of way.
Is it completely necessary that one becomes aware of and looks more specifically at him? No, and people that truly go more within and contact higher levels of guidance from within, probably don't need such focus on him in the above sense. They will be told and shown similar by their guidance eventually as they near the kind of attunement to love he was about and lived.
However, these also i've found are somewhat rare in this world. Many are still primarily focusing on this or that book, this or that teacher, this or that class, etc., etc. The latter is why i somewhat often reference to outer, well known or somewhat well known sources. I do so when their info matches up to what i've received, because i know that others will not so much listen just to me and my perceptions on things because i'm not in a position of being a teacher or some kind of well known and respected "figure" like a Monroe, Cayce, Moen, Campbell, etc.
It's about reaching people and opening up minds, it's not about self.