Hi Lauris,
I might be the only one who uses this exact phrase, but only because I like to precise on that. I think it's necessary to be precise here, as otherwise it just won't get us anywhere.
Yes, we can make the approach to split off personal decisions into a part which is preconditioned and one which is free. But then, when we focus on what the free part is, and how it works, the problem remains the same.
To make choices doesn't imply at all that these choices are made freely. It seems more the contrary: "Making choices", as it is used in a common sense, seems to imply to think about what to chose, and therefore to make use of what we've experienced and learnt in the past; and even intuition and subconscious processes are something which depend on past experiences, and/or influences from other sources; if not, we would make choices without reason, without a cause; and this then can't be called "personal" choices, as this very type of choices (without reason, without cause) won't got together with the concept of "person"; it would far more resemble randomness and chaos.
Of course, the material system of cause and effect, time and space in the end might just be one of many existing systems. But in other systems, where cause&effect, time and space don't exist, "free will" won't have any meaning. So, no matter how I turn it, it just doesn't make sense- to me anyway.
Thanks for reading (the few who still follow this
),
Spooky