First I want to stress that you must do the simple exercise below by not thinking about but just drawing whatever comes into your mind “Get a pencil and paper” please only then scroll; down and view the very simple task If you find it of interest we can try others

Draw what immediately comes into your mind and PLEASE DON’T POST WHAT YOU HAVE DRAWN. I WANT TO WAITE UNTIL A GOOD FEW HAVE READ THIS THREAD AND ALSO RESPONDED TO IT BEFORE I TELL YOU WHAT MOST OF YOU HAVE DRAWN ON YOUR PAPER

Hi guys,

I see 50 have read the thread and only 5 have indicated an interest, Lets wait until Tuesaday 20.00 GMT and I will reveal what I think most people drew. Even the other 46 that did not activily respond. They should if I am close.


alan

Hi guys, I post these results early due to time zones and I think the really interested have all come on board

The great reveal of the fallible psychic come mystic.

Before I reveal what I attempted to influence you to draw, I would like to emphasise how absolutely infinitesimly minutely vanishingly small it would be to even come remotely close, to even one of you guys to drawing the correct object.

I asked you to draw two objects one inside the other, correct?. I just want you to stop here and ask you to think of the billions or zillions of objects there are out there combined by the unlikelyhood of you drawing two of them, one inside of the other. Got me point I hope? I generalised the whole experiment leaving it wide open by not specifying geometrical shapes or objects of nature etc etc.

Just to emphazise how even more how unlikely it is for me to even have “one hit”, we must consider the tiny number of people participating in this experiment. Rhine and Co when trying to verify and validate the truth of psychic abilities such as telephathy etc, used huge numbers of participants, who took hundreds of thousands of tests and found only a tiny mnute deviation from chance.

Strangly sometimes these deviations were in the negative direction, seeming to indicate that just by experimenting less positive results where sometimes the result, no matter how hard the participants tried to project the image

As an Industrial/ Mechanical Engineer I have some knowledge of statistics and proberbility facturisation

That’s my two cents worth, first read just a few of the objects/shapes amongst the almost infinity of possible shapes you might have chosed to draw, and only then scoll down and see how close I got.   

Read just a few of the type of shapes or objects below that, you might have drawn and then take into consideration I asked you to draw one inside the other making the whole exercise even more difficult



•      polygon
o      concave polygon
o      constructible polygon
o      convex polygon
o      cyclic polygon
o      decagon
o      digon
o      dodecagon
o      enneagon
o      equiangular polygon
o      equilateral polygon
o      henagon
o      hendecagon
o      heptagon
o      hexadecagon
o      hexagon
      Lemoine hexagon
o      icosagon
      swastika
o      octagon
o      pentagon
o      regular polygon
      regular decagon
      regular octagon
      regular pentagon
o      star without crossing lines
o      star polygon
      decagram
      octagram
      star of Lakshmi (octagram)
      heptagram
      star of David, hexagram
      pentagram
•      triangle
o      acute triangle
o      anticomplementary triangle
o      equilateral triangle
o      excentral triangle
o      isosceles triangle
o      medial triangle
o      obtuse triangle
o      rational triangle
o      right triangle
      30-60-90 triangle
      isosceles right triangle
      Kepler triangle
o      scalene triangle
o      Reuleaux triangle
•      parallelogram
o      equilateral parallelogram: rhombus
      Lozenge
o      rhomboid
•      Penrose tile
•      rectangle
•      rhombus
•      square
•      trapezium
o      isosceles trapezium
•      quadrilateral
o      cyclic quadrilateral, tetrachord
o      kite
o      tangential quadrilateral
o      trapezoid
      isosceles trapezoid
•      polydrafter
•      annulus
•      arbelos
•      circle
o      disc
o      Archimedes' circle
o      Bankoff circle
o      circumcircle
o      excircle
o      incircle
o      nine-point circle
•      circular sector
•      circular segment
•      crescent
•      various lemniscates
•      lune
•      oval
•      Reuleaux polygon
•      rotor
o      lens, vesica piscis (fish bladder)
o      Reuleaux triangle
•      sphere
•      semicircle
•      triquetra
•      Yin-Yang
•      tomoe, Archimedean spiral
•      astroid, paracycle, cubocycloid
•      deltoid
•      ellipse
•      smoothed octagon
•      super ellipse
•      tomahawk


Triangles -- triangle object and related functions.
Faces -- face object and related functions.
Surfaces -- surface object and related functions

And all these could be flat or three dimensional!

Now scroll all the way down!




























































































































This is what I tried to get you guys to draw. Either a circle with a triangle inside or the reverse.

The naughty ones who took a little time to think about it might have drawn a circle with a square or box inside, but what did really first come into your mind

If I am not remotely correct then I must admit as a remote influencing telepath I am a failure, but that is OK with me as the experiments was fun

alan

Now Guys,

Let us sum this up one by one. Before this, I dare anyone to go to any of these supposed online psychics and come them even remotely near to my efforts under the exact same conditions.

Bets
Quote:


You definitely have points Bets at least fifty % on target the oval is a round shape or object and of the countless billion possibilities you chose this. The chick’s body showed your artistic nature and you just possible thought too long before drawing, naughty

Varga.
Quote:


Yes but did I not say the naughty ones might draw square or box inside a circle or the reverse just as you seem to have done. If a miss very near to the bull’s eye I think.

SHSS
Quote:
?

Ah!! AWELL BEHAVED CONTESTANT DID EXACTLY WHAT I ASKED AND DREW THE first thing that came into mind. Exact hit

Lucy
Quote:


This was by no means meant to be mathematical in nature and the oval is as good as a round circle so you also came under my influence dear by drawing it. Naughty for thinking to long about it

Quote:


By no means a stretch of the billions and zillions of objects you could have chosen to draw why a balloon. I see this as a 50% hit.

Blink
Quote:


By thinking about it you brought your own mind to the for and weakened the influence, but the circle again how likely to draw this amongst the infinity of choices out there.

Light of love
Quote:


A 100& hit you first drew the exact I sent to you guys, then became naughty and thought about it


Spooky
Quote:


Not silly but the telephone old-style very near to a square, dial up disk a circle right , just what I wanted you to draw.

Alysia.

I here I am here not ducking and diving in abject fear,

It was fuk but I dont think Bruce would approve it we continue, A suggestion however, how about one of you guys being bold and trying toe same on the rest of us. Just kidding

Bets asked how I did it. I just lay down and projected once a thought at each of you the two possible images I wanted you to draw, first was a cirle in a triangle or the reverse (I consider this one object, secondary image was a square or box inside a circle again considered as one object

what do you guys think?

alan

Guys

Alysia quoted

Quote:


I would have shown the shapes/objects but blush blus blush blush this wonderful psychic does not know how . Alysia dear please show me how by PM.

Lights of Love Your quote.
Quote:


Kathy girl you got it I am not the only sensitive here "we all are", thus our group mind coming into play and Varga influencing the expiment in another direction. You guys just need a little practise.

Lastly I would like you to know that I made the test much more difficult for me,  by asking you to draw "objects" (man !! that left it wide open did it not) Nearly everything we come into contact could be an object, house, tree, moon, building etc etc

You guys drew geometric shapes and if I had requested that it would have narrowed down the field would it not.

Remember the remote viewing I did a while ago where the process ,was the reverse, you the infuencer and me the targer trying to reach something significant in your lifes, revisit that if you want to

alan

Judittha dear,

I am so sorry!! you drew exactly what I projected as my first choice Remarably good you are very psychic dear as the remote viewing exercise also showed

Alysia

Your quote
Quote:


[color=#000000]Well not exactly a square, you drew a rectangle, but very close indeed I see it as a hit as you drew a four sided shape with a circle inside.

I will attempt to summerise this expirement properly and post it in a way that is more understandable

The term I used "telepathy test" is wrong, maybe more of a remote viewing, me sort of peeking at your drawings, not influencing your thoughts, this would be immoral. God prevents us from just going into another persons mind and trampling on this most private of sanctuaries

Thomas,

Quote:


Ahh!! Another helpful comment from you, not large enough? Maybe I should send a separate copy to you via PM

If you take off your glasses you might see it was not a lecture but a report back. For the others I will change it, for you Naahh!!

Cat dear

Your drawing is a 100% hit

alan