dave_a_mbs
Super Member
Offline
Afterlife Knowledge Member
Posts: 1655
central california
Gender:
|
There's a lot to be said for faith healing, even if it doesn't work in every case. On the other hand, Ernest Holmes, founder of Science of Mind church (similar to Mary Baker Eddy's Christian Science) took a very realistic approach. His suggestion was, "If an aspirin can heal your headache, then take an aspirin."
Looking back at the indcidents of healings that I recall, the emphasis seems to be more a matter of personal values and outlook than having to do with anything like belief in this or that, although the idea that God loves, nurtures and re-energizes us seems to be a useful component. The example that comes to mind is a man wirth cancer of the pancreas who had been given up by his physicians. So an enterprising healer announced that he had acquired a new Mexican anti-cancer drug called "Kreboizin" (there is such a drug, made from apiricot pits, that has little effect on anything). He assured the patient that this would be effective. In fact, the "drug" was simply distilled water. But after a few injections, the cancer went itno remission.
The story continues, unfortunately. Someone leaked the awful truth that it was only a placebo, and the cancer promptly returned. So the same technician went back to his initial plan and announced that he now had "the real thing", and that this time it was immensely more powerful. Again it was distilled water. However a few injections proved effective and the cancer again was back in remission.
There always seems to be a spoil sport who wants to inflict the truth (as they see it) in the most damaging manner. So again, someone told the patient that it was still nothing but distilled water. The cancer returned and promptly killed him.
There are numerous cases in which people have been healed of terrible conditions where there seems to be little evidence of biological reasons. This was true of Mary Baker Eddy, and there are endless tales of healings through divine interventions. The Catholic rite of Extreme Unction (the last rites given to the living) is essentially a laying on of hands and faith healing, and occasionally it is effective. It seems to me that the problem seems to be that people who believe in faith healing often seem to have withdrawn their belief in personal responsibility. Getting over an ilness or injury does, in general, require a certain degree of personal involvement.
To my mind, failure to use proven methods to solve problems may appear gloriously bold, faithful or heroic, but it makes poor sense. After all, the same God who made diseases also made antibiotics. Who are we to discriminate against God's gifts?
dave
|