Copyrighted Logo

css menu by Css3Menu.com


 

Bruce's 5th book, a Home Study Course, is now available.
Books & Tapes by Bruce Moen
    Bruce's Blog now at http://www.afterlife-knowledge.com/blog....

  HomeHelpSearchLoginRegister  
 
Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print
Deepak Chopra (Read 14363 times)
AhSoLaoTsuAhhOmmra
Ex Member


Re: Deepak Chopra
Reply #15 - Nov 14th, 2007 at 2:05pm
 
EternalEssence wrote on Nov 14th, 2007 at 1:05pm:
It is all a great adventure, isn't it.

E. Smiley


  Yup, certainly tis.  May all of our minds and hearts expand, and completely merge while on this great adventure. 

  It was an interesting chat, and thanks.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
EternalEssence
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 127
Re: Deepak Chopra
Reply #16 - Nov 14th, 2007 at 2:16pm
 
And thank you, as well.

E.
Smiley
Back to top
 

The elegance of the final produce belies the chaos of its construction.
 
IP Logged
 
recoverer
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 5027
Gender: male
Re: Deepak Chopra
Reply #17 - Nov 14th, 2007 at 3:25pm
 
"Possibly exposure to such materials while growing up?" Possibly Eternal Essence is making an assumption because he doesn't want to seriously consider what Christ is all about.

During my night in heaven experience, despite my previous doubts, I understood at an inner level that was deeper than belief, that the afterlife and God existed, without having to think about it. This understanding was certain. Not only that, I completely understood how it was possible for God and the afterlife to exist, in a manner that was beyond what my pre-existing beliefs were.

This realm wasn't just some mere belief system. It "wasn't" a place that mirrored this physical realm. It was a place where beings abided as one in perfection without body based identities. It was understood that everything worked out perfectly in the end.

Regarding my experience of Christ during this experience, it wasn't a matter of my seeing a being of light and assuming this being was Christ. It wasn't a matter of a spirit appearing to me with the image of Jesus so I would be presented with something my preconceptions would allow me to understand. It wasn't a matter of my asking about Christ and some spirit telling me he's for real simply because this is what I could understand at the time. Rather, there was a knowledge that pervaded the realm I was in, and this knowledge inwardly let me know that Christ is in some way, a big part of human spiritual reality. When I understood this I was quite surprised, because I believed differently at the time. At the end of the experience a bright star was shown to me. I believe this star was "intentionally" shown to confirm that Christ is a significant part of divine reality, because this is what the star immediately represented to me. It makes perfect sense to me that the divine beings who helped me have this experience (I did nothing to cause it to happen), understood what I would take this star to mean. Yet they "chose" to show it to me.

Since this experience I've received a number of messages and have had a number of experiences stating that Christ is a significant part of the divine order that exists. I've received and experienced them in a manner which shows that it isn't a matter of my pre-existing beliefs being placated. They have also been presented to me in a manner that show that my own mind isn't creating them.

Why did I have these experiences while other spiritual seekers haven't? Because I came to the point where I realized it was a big mistake to allow my distaste for fundamentalism to be the deciding factor when it comes to figuring out what Christ is all about. I opened my heart and mind to the question of Christ with sincerity, and received numerous answers.

My feeling is that Christ isn't going to force himself on anybody. If a person chooses to have unwarrented prejudices against him, that is such a person's choice. My suggestion is that a person doesn't allow the fundamentalist ideas of others, to hold he or she hostage for the rest of his or her life. Once a person lets go of such limiting ideas, he or she will find that some energetic blocks within his or her heart chakra etc will be cleared away.

Eternal Essence:
Why is it you're so quick to defend various sources of information, but as soon as somebody mentions having experiences with Christ, you assume he or she dabling with a belief system?


[quote author=EternalEssence link=1194364896/0#14 date=1195059949]
How is it that Recoverer an atheist at the time, and certainly not a Christian by any means, would nonphysically pick up such clear, deeply knowing at a core level, and convincing (to him) info that Christ is a large part of God's plans?. Possibly exposure to such materials growing up. Obviously being an atheist, one must accept the idea that there is no "God" thus the concept of God must be understood, absorbed, intellectually rationalized. I won't speak about another person's experience. How exactly does one go about believing in the nonexistence of something that doesn't exist to be not believed in?

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
EternalEssence
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 127
Re: Deepak Chopra
Reply #18 - Nov 14th, 2007 at 4:15pm
 
"Possibly exposure to such materials while growing up?" Possibly Eternal Essence is making an assumption because he doesn't want to seriously consider what Christ is all about. You make the usual assumption here, recoverer. Sorry if I don't jump on your bandwagon or throw a parade. I stand by what I have discussed. No more needed.

"During my night in heaven experience, despite my previous doubts, I understood at an inner level that was deeper than belief, that the afterlife and God existed, without having to think about it. This understanding was certain. Not only that, I completely understood how it was possible for God and the afterlife to exist, in a manner that was beyond what my pre-existing beliefs were." I am glad you found something you could believe in.

This realm wasn't just some mere belief system. It "wasn't" a place that mirrored this physical realm. It was a place where beings abided as one in perfection without body based identities. It was understood that everything worked out perfectly in the end. Interesting theory.

Regarding my experience of Christ during this experience, it wasn't a matter of my seeing a being of light and assuming this being was Christ. It wasn't a matter of a spirit appearing to me with the image of Jesus so I would be presented with something my preconceptions would allow me to understand. It wasn't a matter of my asking about Christ and some spirit telling me he's for real simply because this is what I could understand at the time. Rather, there was a knowledge that pervaded the realm I was in, and this knowledge inwardly let me know that Christ is in some way, a big part of human spiritual reality. When I understood this I was quite surprised, because I believed differently at the time. At the end of the experience a bright star was shown to me. I believe this star was "intentionally" shown to confirm that Christ is a significant part of divine reality, because this is what the star immediately represented to me. It makes perfect sense to me that the divine beings who helped me have this experience (I did nothing to cause it to happen), understood what I would take this star to mean. Yet they "chose" to show it to me. I am glad you found someone who understands you. I do not agree that you did nothing to cause it to happen, but that is a personal opinion.

Since this experience I've received a number of messages and have had a number of experiences stating that Christ is a significant part of the divine order that exists. I've received and experienced them in a manner which shows that it isn't a matter of my pre-existing beliefs being placated. They have also been presented to me in a manner that show that my own mind isn't creating them. It's good that you are taking notes.

Why did I have these experiences while other spiritual seekers haven't? Because I came to the point where I realized it was a big mistake to allow my distaste for fundamentalism to be the deciding factor when it comes to figuring out what Christ is all about. I opened my heart and mind to the question of Christ with sincerity, and received numerous answers. Why are you asking this? You were involved in it, you participated. I'm sure you know why it happened. If not, maybe you are, as you say, blocked. In that case, I am confident you will figure it out.

My feeling is that Christ isn't going to force himself on anybody. If a person chooses to have unwarrented prejudices against him, that is such a person's choice. My suggestion is that a person doesn't allow the fundamentalist ideas of others, to hold he or she hostage for the rest of his or her life. Once a person lets go of such limiting ideas, he or she will find that some energetic blocks within his or her heart chakra etc will be cleared away. Feelings are lovely, ethereal things. No one can misinterpret them.

Why is it you're so quick to defend various sources of information, but as soon as somebody mentions having experiences with Christ, you assume he or she dabling with a belief system? I am not defending anyone -- I don't need to compete for any one persons personal experiences. That implies they need my assistance, which they don't. I speak for the me of me. As with you, I don't need validation or to justify myself. As to people dabbling in a belief system...well that is just rather silly, don't you think. Beliefs about Christ don't have any experience on actuality, or so it's been said.


Blessing and Joy
E.

Back to top
 

The elegance of the final produce belies the chaos of its construction.
 
IP Logged
 
recoverer
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 5027
Gender: male
Re: Deepak Chopra
Reply #19 - Nov 14th, 2007 at 5:14pm
 
Eternal Essence:

Your response reminds me of the below dialogue with Bruce. Bruce didn't write specifically about the kind of experiences I shared, but I believe what he wrote still applies. Cynics aren't in a good position to invalidate the experiences of others according to their limited ways of judging them. They could find out for themselves, if they are willing.

Why do I press this issue? Because many people are too quick dissmiss the experiences of others when they involve Christ. They judge themselves to be more sophisticated that the people who have them. Consider near death experiences. Some which involve Christ could be seen to be influenced by the belief system of the person who has the experience. But there have been near death experiences where people clearly experienced things beyond what a Christian belief system would enable them to experience, yet they still found out that Christ does play a key role in the grand scheme of things. If a person dismisses such examples, there is a good chance this person is being selective according to his or her preferences. Such preferences might interfere with what he or she is able to experience spiritually.


From another thread:
"Recoverer,

Quote from recoverer on Jul 23rd, 2007, 10:49am:
How can a person be open to proof when they won't accept the proof you provide?

Your question so perfectly brings into focus the crux of the problem.  I finally came to the conclusion that it is impossible to provide proof for anyone other than ourselves through our own direct experience.  Unfortunately many who insist that nonphysical reality doesn't exist see their belieft as adequae reason to not waste their time investigating.

The planet we live on would still be flat if it hadn't been for someone who was willing risk sailing off the edge into the Abyss to discover the Truth.  And then, based on the reports of these few brave souls, other folks had the courage to sail toward the edge of the Earth to see for themselves.   

Many who visit this site have sailed beyond the edge of physical reality to search for the Truth of our afterlife's existence through there own direct experience.  And many of them now know the Truth.  I knew that was the most I could hope for when this website was first put up in 1996.  I am delighted and happy to see that so many brave souls continue to post their reports and in doing so encourage others to go sailing.

Love to you ALL,

Bruce"

http://www.afterlife-knowledge.com/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.cgi?num=1184817642/0#0
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
EternalEssence
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 127
Re: Deepak Chopra
Reply #20 - Nov 14th, 2007 at 7:48pm
 
Your response reminds me of the below dialogue with Bruce. Bruce didn't write specifically about the kind of experiences I shared, but I believe what he wrote still applies. Cynics aren't in a good position to invalidate the experiences of others according to their limited ways of judging them. They could find out for themselves, if they are willing.
Well, thank you for comparing me with Bruce. I consider that a compliment. I have not quite figured out this obsession you have with insisting that you understand me. As I recall, you barbed someone else for that exact mentality. As to your feelings of being invalidated, I can only suggest that you deal with those psychological issues on your own. They did not originate with me. At no point have I stated "you are wrong"; however, that you presume that any idea beyond your "I bring word from heaven" scenarios are less credible is really ridiculous in my opinion. If you want to throw them around to limit other people from expressing themselves, feel free. I am use to seeing the repercussions of that here. However, again, it simply does not invalidate anything that I have stated. My chuck wagaon is still parked where it was, so feel free to circle it and take another shot if you choose.

Why do I press this issue? Because many people are too quick dissmiss the experiences of others when they involve Christ. They judge themselves to be more sophisticated that the people who have them. Consider near death experiences. Some which involve Christ could be seen to be influenced by the belief system of the person who has the experience. But there have been near death experiences where people clearly experienced things beyond what a Christian belief system would enable them to experience, yet they still found out that Christ does play a key role in the grand scheme of things. If a person dismisses such examples, there is a good chance this person is being selective according to his or her preferences. Such preferences might interfere with what he or she is able to experience spiritually. I am sure that you can find tons of information that helps you with your arguments; however, I do not argue. Again, I do not need validation of my experiences, of what I know. I am sure that I could locate just as much information that contradicts you. What would be the point? An endless argument that has nothing to do with knowledge or truth, only a need to be competitve. You will not entangle me in that mess. Your web is of your own devising. Spin it, run around gleefully bouncing from one thread to another. Enjoy yourself.

What a brilliant quote you have provided for your own argument which actually supports my point.
"I finally came to the conclusion that it is impossible to provide proof for anyone other than ourselves through our own direct experience. Brilliant. Again, if you believed that you would understand that no person can invalidate your experience.

"Unfortunately many who insist that nonphysical reality doesn't exist see their belieft as adequae reason to not waste their time investigating." Aside from the typos, I shall state that again you go beyond what you know and assume grandly, perpetrating a huge lie that you know what I have and have not investigated, what I have and have not experienced.

"The planet we live on would still be flat if it hadn't been for someone who was willing risk sailing off the edge into the Abyss to discover the Truth.  And then, based on the reports of these few brave souls, other folks had the courage to sail toward the edge of the Earth to see for themselves."
recoverer failed to follow with the question: And what about those who have sailed out and brought back information that contradicts you? How do you feel about them? (This is rather rhetorical and the answer is obvious if you are paying attention).

Many who visit this site have sailed beyond the edge of physical reality to search for the Truth of our afterlife's existence through there own direct experience.  And many of them now know the Truth.  I knew that was the most I could hope for when this website was first put up in 1996.  I am delighted and happy to see that so many brave souls continue to post their reports and in doing so encourage others to go sailing."

Bruce offered a wonderful sentiment here, recoverer. I can't agree more. Sail away.

E.
Smiley
Back to top
 

The elegance of the final produce belies the chaos of its construction.
 
IP Logged
 
recoverer
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 5027
Gender: male
Re: Deepak Chopra
Reply #21 - Nov 14th, 2007 at 8:28pm
 
Eternal Essence:

Responses within double quotation marks below.

I am sure that you can find tons of information that helps you with your arguments; however, I do not argue. Again, I do not need validation of my experiences, of what I know. I am sure that I could locate just as much information that contradicts you. What would be the point? An endless argument that has nothing to do with knowledge or truth, only a need to be competitve. You will not entangle me in that mess. Your web is of your own devising. Spin it, run around gleefully bouncing from one thread to another. Enjoy yourself.

""The above mainly sprouted when I spoke of near death experiences. I have yet to read and NDE where a person was told, "Jesus Christ doesn't have anything to do with divine reality" in some shape or form. The experiences of people who have experienced Christ in some way, don't get negated by the lack of such an experience by people who don't experience his presence. To suggest that their lack of experience of Christ negates the experiences of those who have experienced Christ, is equivalent to saying this forum doesn't exist because some people haven't experienced it.

I write what I write so that anybody who just might have an inkling to find out what Christ is about on their own, might be inspired to do so. The reason I write about it on this thread, is because "YOU" made the suggestion that my experiences are nothing but belief system based hallucinations.  Going by your additional posts this is what you had in mind.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
AhSoLaoTsuAhhOmmra
Ex Member


Re: Deepak Chopra
Reply #22 - Nov 14th, 2007 at 11:54pm
 
  Hi Recoverer, i don't see E.E. necessarily invalidating or denouncing Christ, or his place in the grand scheme of things here.  Even if she/he was, well that's her/his prerogative, just as its fine if we disagree with that.  Hopefully we all can do it in a civil and less personal manner overall. 

  Hi E.E., i don't understand some of your retorts to Recoverer, particularly about the pointlessness of debating ones beliefs, perceptions, etc., with others, when it seems you are the one who directly responded to one of his posts to begin with on this thread, and seemingly tried to tell him how he should be or believe.    You contradict yourself and some of your other statements. 

  I see no difference between you telling Albert (or i) what's up with reality, truth, and his lack of understanding of same, and him telling you his truth, and suggesting that you lack understanding.  No difference at all, except that Recoverer is not preaching one thing, and doing another, whereas you seem to be.  It was similar with you responding to my replies, and that's why i used the ironic phrase earlier.  Do you not see the inconsistency and contradiction here?
Back to top
« Last Edit: Nov 15th, 2007 at 1:20am by N/A »  
 
IP Logged
 
AhSoLaoTsuAhhOmmra
Ex Member


Re: Deepak Chopra
Reply #23 - Nov 15th, 2007 at 1:15am
 
  To me, there is a world of difference (yet also a subtle one) between contradiction (especially as applied to human nature and living in the physical) and paradox (especially as applying to Archetypal creation patterns).

Paradox can be indicative of truth, just as yin/feminine--yang/masculine both being equally important and valid energies/realities/perspectives, and yet quite different and the simultaneous existence or truth of both being paradoxical seeming.    Similar with the equally true, objective truths of oneness and individuality/uniqueness--these and the law of energy resonation apply to everyone.   

  Yet, contradiction in other areas oft points to relative degrees of untruth.   There is probably a good reason why Bob Monroe, Bruce Moen, and Cayce's sources placed a certain amount of emphasis on practical, more materially obvious verifications relating to nonphysical info.   Simple truth is that some psychic sources, have been more repeatedly verified in that more holistic way which also considers the physical and not just the mental and spiritual belief systems.  These also seem to contain less contradictions than some other psychic sources.

  Neptune and the right brain says, believe in whatever you feel to be true, let only the heart and your feelings lead you.  Mercury and the left brain says wait, some beliefs are inherently and universally constructive or destructive, better discriminate mentally, logically, and practically as well as feel. 

  When these merge completely then the Sun it all its glory shines forth.   How many are shining forth only the Sun, and who have merged these completely?

  If you go with one over the other, than you are only perceiving half truths and your perception will be distorted as judged individually, and from the perspective of the ultimate, the One.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
EternalEssence
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 127
Re: Deepak Chopra
Reply #24 - Nov 15th, 2007 at 2:29am
 
""The above mainly sprouted when I spoke of near death experiences. I have yet to read and NDE where a person was told, "Jesus Christ doesn't have anything to do with divine reality" in some shape or form. The experiences of people who have experienced Christ in some way, don't get negated by the lack of such an experience by people who don't experience his presence. To suggest that their lack of experience of Christ negates the experiences of those who have experienced Christ, is equivalent to saying this forum doesn't exist because some people haven't experienced it.
Well, it's nice to know that possiblity exists since though you may not have read it, it doesn't necessarily invalidate it. Also, you seem to negate those having NDEs that had no Christ connections. As to the odd comment about the existence of this forum -- well, that's a stretch. To those who haven't experienced it, it doesn't exist in their reality, does it? It serves its purpose to those here, who DO experience it, because of the purpose that brought them here -- which, surprisingly is diverse and may have had nothing to do with NDEs or Christ.

I write what I write so that anybody who just might have an inkling to find out what Christ is about on their own, might be inspired to do so. The reason I write about it on this thread, is because "YOU" made the suggestion that my experiences are nothing but belief system based hallucinations. Going by your additional posts this is what you had in mind.
You make more assumptions, and then throw in words like hallucinations. Anyone reading the thread, as the person above has reported, notes that what you perceive to be denouncement is nothing of the sort. But your belief systems DO color your experiences, as your responses have thus far proven. Sorry, if that is hard to take.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
"Hi Recoverer, i don't see E.E. necessarily invalidating or denouncing Christ, or his place in the grand scheme of things here."
What is most important it seems is this concept of invalidation. As it was pointed out in a previous post, only the person having the experience can invalidate it. It is as real to them as anything; however, being real to one person with all of its coloration does not invalidate the experience of another whose experience does not reflect a belief system of the first person who had the experience.
"Even if she/he was, well that's her/his prerogative, just as its fine if we disagree with that. Hopefully we all can do it in a civil and less personal manner overall."

Supports point above.


Hi E.E., i don't understand some of your retorts to Recoverer, particularly about the pointlessness of debating ones beliefs, perceptions, etc., with others, when it seems you are the one who directly responded to one of his posts to begin with on this thread, and seemingly tried to tell him how he should be or believe. You contradict yourself and some of your other statements." Honestly? recoverer is free to BELIEVE in whatever he wants. However, he is going to have to accept the fact that his BELIEFS are his and though shared by some, it does not invalidate the reality that others have different BELIEFS that are just as valid as his claims and experiences, regardless of how he feels about them. He is free to disagree, as he often does. I applaud disagreement because it offers a chance to discuss, as does contradictions, which forces you to think beyond the confines of your experiences. It is never pointless to seek the most knowledge one can gain. As has been stated in previous posts, I have said do not limit yourself, which I believe has been stated by others.

I see no difference between you telling Albert (or i) what's up with reality, truth, and his lack of understanding of same, and him telling you his truth, and suggesting that you lack understanding. No difference at all, except that Recoverer is not preaching one thing, and doing another, whereas you seem to be. It was similar with you responding to my replies, and that's why i used the ironic phrase earlier. Do you not see the inconsistency and contradiction here?
Ah, and herein lies the the thrust of it: him telling...his truth.
First, reality is open to interpretation. I do realize that ALBERTS EXPERIENCES are ALBERT'S truth. I do not take his truth from him. BUT his truth does not entitle him to basically take another's truth from THEM. I am sure that at the core, he has something that states: this is the way it is. Fine. Let him. Let anyone. Free will and the creative spirit. I like him no less and no more because of it. It simply is the way it is. If he changes, he must do it based on his reasons. If he does not like my responses...well, honestly, I don't care. Because he doesn't agree or like something does not make it untrue to anyone but those who align themselves with similar experiences and beliefs.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
To me, there is a world of difference (yet also a subtle one) between contradiction (especially as applied to human nature and living in the physical) and paradox (especially as applying to Archetypal creation patterns). Paradox can be indicative of truth, just as yin/feminine--yang/masculine both being equally important and valid energies/realities/perspectives, and yet quite different and the simultaneous existence or truth of both being paradoxical seeming. Similar with the equally true, objective truths of oneness and individuality/uniqueness--these and the law of energy resonation apply to everyone. And everyone resonates differently.
Yet, contradiction in other areas oft points to relative degrees of untruth.
There is probably a good reason why Bob Monroe, Bruce Moen, and Cayce's sources placed a certain amount of emphasis on practical, more materially obvious verifications relating to nonphysical info. Simple truth is that some psychic sources, have been more repeatedly verified in that more holistic way which also considers the physical and not just the mental and spiritual belief systems. These also seem to contain less contradictions than some other psychic sources.
One has to also factor into this equation the varying influences and the degree of those influences (internal and external) that led to them having these experiences. Bruce, for instances, found knowledge in Carlos Castenada. Does that invalidate him because some consider Castenda a hoax? What of those that do not? If he had not, would he have found what he did? Bruce was a graduate of TMI. What influence did that play (well, those of us here experience that to a degree). Do those of us graduating from TMI experience the same thing? No. In the same way? No.

Neptune and the right brain says, believe in whatever you feel to be true, let only the heart and your feelings lead you. Mercury and the left brain says wait, some beliefs are inherently and universally constructive or destructive, better discriminate mentally, logically, and practically as well as feel.
When these merge completely then the Sun it all its glory shines forth. How many are shining forth only the Sun, and who have merged these completely?
If you go with one over the other, than you are only perceiving half truths and your perception will be distorted as judged individually, and from the perspective of the ultimate, the One.

This is a beautiful philosophy. Being the astrologer you are, I am certain it means something important to you based on what I read here.


E.
Smiley


Back to top
 

The elegance of the final produce belies the chaos of its construction.
 
IP Logged
 
tgecks
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 315
Dahlonega, Georgia
Gender: male
Re: Deepak Chopra
Reply #25 - Nov 15th, 2007 at 10:39am
 
Well it seems almost diabolical to mention Deppak at this point.... but here I go.

I had the great good fortune too sit with Deepak Chopra on a plane trip, and we talked for the entire six hour flight. He would be the first one to tell you that he is also a student here, just as we are, and he is fumbling along just like the rest of us.

His paradigm is Ayurvedic and blended with his western medical education, and it was a fasciating flight. He is a humble and generous man who would, like Christ, tell you that he is nothing that you are not. What he is, you are. What he can do, you can do. This and more will you, too, do.

And all the rest of it is blah-blah-blah......

There is only one of us here. But there is only one of us there, too.

Just my 2 cents worth....

Thomas
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
AhSoLaoTsuAhhOmmra
Ex Member


Re: Deepak Chopra
Reply #26 - Nov 15th, 2007 at 10:55am
 
  Beautiful post Thomas, and i don't doubt that he has many wonderful traits.

 
At the same time, in a general sense, its also important to be aware of that fact that some people, people with either mental or material influence, aren't always what they seem or want others to think about them.  Considering some of things you've said to me in private, you should more than realize that.

  Problem with particularly those in the spiritual, new age world, many of them talk the talk very well, and they will tell you much they are just regular folks, blah blah blah, and it can be very convincing.  Meanwhile, they are making money off of you dishonestly, or sometimes worse.

  People's innate trust, nativity, lack of discrimination etc. is what allows those more consistently destructive or materialistic Guru types to get away with that kind of dishonest or hurtful stuff.  I'm not saying that this applies to Deepak, but just pointing out that of course we are all One and all that, and its a great focus, but while we are all one, we all are also completely unique and individual and that's just as important as Oneness...the only problem is that in the physical the differences seem to get too concentrated on, especially at the expense of the underlying Oneness.  The right brain perceives and concentrates on "Oneness" and stillness the left brain perceives and concentrates on individuality, uniqueness, and movement.   Neither one is above the other in the ultimate sense.

  Yes, i tend to keep my eyes open in relation to those selling their stuff in the spiritual world, because for one, it is not the pattern of Christ and his life--he gave without any thought of material compensation.   Especially to any who tell us that we need their stuff, or that it will cause spiritual growth.    The last one is one of the worst, but most common lies in the spiritual, new age world.   Only you exercising your freewill in a positive/constructive manner brings true spiritual growth.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
rNick
New Member
*
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 25
Joburg / South Africa
Gender: male
Re: Deepak Chopra
Reply #27 - Nov 15th, 2007 at 1:13pm
 
Good Evening , i consider myself over most of my life a Pub and pie person. Loved meeting up with a few mates talk footy and have a good laugh, but a few things change over the last few years especially since the passing of my mother and a few good friends since. I got interested in do we contiue after that final breath , has I miss those ones close to me and those ones that shall pass before me. I have searched the internet find myself interesting chaps like Deepak Chopra and a number of interesting sites like the one im on now. Started reading more afterlife books and have been reading the ULTIMATE REALITY were of all the things that in my short space of time searching I feel that this particular book sounds like the closest to what happens when one passes over.

I have been on and of this site for a few years and has you can see with my number of posts im more of a reader then poster but go to the Manchester United F.C. sites and you will see that its the opposite Wink. I think one of reasons for this is yes i know that one writes in english and I can read it but to understand this whole concept is completely well let me put it this way mind blowing.

The one thing that im slowly begining to understand is this brief system thing and like i said of all the books and its not many that i have read my brief system is closet to the Ultimate Reality.Ok Christans believe in something else Heaven and Hell and other religions have there brief systems. However maybe its from my back ground of none church going and the friends and family that i associate with that most of this people that i know ,maybe hope theres something else but are intuned to there 5 senses believe that this is the one chance you get so drink eat and be bloody merry for tomorrow may not arrive.

The question in a long winded way is if a person has no religious briefs or any brief systems fullstop if that person has no thought that once the last breath is finished there is nothing else and his/her brief system believes this is this the end for that soul. Or are these the souls that are retrived by Bruce and others. Thanks Manchester United for the league.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
rNick
New Member
*
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 25
Joburg / South Africa
Gender: male
Re: Deepak Chopra
Reply #28 - Nov 15th, 2007 at 1:26pm
 
tgecks wrote on Nov 15th, 2007 at 10:39am:
Well it seems almost diabolical to mention Deppak at this point.... but here I go.

I had the great good fortune too sit with Deepak Chopra on a plane trip, and we talked for the entire six hour flight. He would be the first one to tell you that he is also a student here, just as we are, and he is fumbling along just like the rest of us.

His paradigm is Ayurvedic and blended with his western medical education, and it was a fasciating flight. He is a humble and generous man who would, like Christ, tell you that he is nothing that you are not. What he is, you are. What he can do, you can do. This and more will you, too, do.

And all the rest of it is blah-blah-blah......

There is only one of us here. But there is only one of us there, too.

Just my 2 cents worth....

Thomas


Wow that most of been some flight. I feel if he even cane this side of Africa i would go to one of his meetings

Nick
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
recoverer
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 5027
Gender: male
Re: Deepak Chopra
Reply #29 - Nov 15th, 2007 at 2:28pm
 
Eternal Essence:

It isn't a matter of speaking about "my truth." To be frank, that is such a new agey thing to say. People tend to use such a way of thinking when they are more interested in having truth be what their ego wants it to be, rather than being interested in finding out what truth actually is.

If Christ is in fact a key part of divine reality, then it isn't a matter of opinion, no matter how hard some people insist that it is. People can try to deny Christ's relevance all they want, but his relevance doesn't go away simply because for whatever reason they find it inconvenient or threatening to acknowledge it.

When I've had experiences and received messages about Christ, they weren't presented to me in a manner of "if this is the truth you want, then here you go." They were presented to me in ways that showed that I was being shown "what truth is" not what is preferential.

Regarding  NDEs, I didn't state that NDEs without Christ are invalidated by NDEs with Christ. I believe it is very possible for a person to have a genuine NDE without the presence of Christ being involved. What I said is that NDEs with Christ can't be reduced to some sort of imaginary experience, simply because some people have NDEs without Christ. There are NDEs where people experienced Christ not because of their pre-existing belief system, but because this is what the divine powers that be wanted to reveal to them.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print


This is a Peer Moderated Forum. You can report Posting Guideline violations.