pulsar wrote on Sep 13th, 2007 at 2:14pm: Quote:The only issue I have is what can be an anti-religion sentiment. Religion as far as general concept IS very necessary. It is the foundation behind praising the same God that any agnostic or spiritual person praises. It's also something that has been key in societal organization, from the creation of laws to providing an institution for collective congregation with others in our community.
Another thing that could probably block "open minded" believing is organized religion a.k.a. church.
What happens there is that a lot of people go there and listen to the preacher's words and hear his interpretations of e.g. the bible. The church as a "house of god". But for what does god need a house, if he IS everything, the whole existence, universe, past, present, future? I questioned a lot the need for a special place to praise god. Every little breath that is taken could be (gone hypocritic again..) could be a "place to praise". Going to church and real believing are two different pairs of shoes.
Or what about relying on the bible as gods ultimate word. It is a basis, but as time goes on, people change, believing changes (could also be seen as a part of the divine plan), what doesn't change is the dogma.
The bible closes with the Revelation of St. John, there are also other scriptures like they found in qumran.
What we do not find are "newer" prophets. Are the times we're living in so worthless that nobody can/wants
to share "visions from god" (the well known prophets of the bible had nothing else than visions from god).
What I was also worrying about is the picture of the "kind" god. If looking on what is happening today, why shouldn't he be angry?
regards,
pulsar
Well, I understand what you mean, but I have learned that there is nothing fruitful that can come from questioning things that are flawed in religion that come from trend and tradition. Sure the church building is not truly needed, but like I mentioned before is something that should be apart of religion and society. The problem stems from worshipping the building, or the pastor, or the Bible, or whatever resource is related to the religious dogma in question.
The stringent details of most religions can be debated, is flawed, yadda yadda. The BASIS of the religion should speak for itself and be what a truly intelligent person should look for. It's just such a negative stigma in our society because the "ignorant" details that are associated with religion are what cause debates, wars, and extremism. My advice has always been to never concern yourself with those things, because when it's all said and done, regardless of what any book or person tells you, God will be the ultimate judge of your heart. And I am willing to bet it won't be based on how many times you have physically been to church...lol.
The mafia of old went to Catholic services everyday, before and after murdering people.
Always think PRINCIPLE before debating INTERPRETATION.