Copyrighted Logo

css menu by Css3Menu.com


 

Bruce's 5th book, a Home Study Course, is now available.
Books & Tapes by Bruce Moen
    Bruce's Blog now at http://www.afterlife-knowledge.com/blog....

  HomeHelpSearchLoginRegister  
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Send Topic Print
Is Conversations With God a good book to read?? (Read 25424 times)
Berserk
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 979
Gender: male
Re: Is Conversations With God a good book to read?
Reply #15 - Apr 22nd, 2007 at 12:11am
 
Duh Bears,

This is the perfect book for th myopic New Age Ghetto that imagines (1) that all dreams of the recently deceased are actual visits from them, (2) that all dreams of leaving the body are genuine OBEs, and (3) that any New Age kook who claims to speak for God should be believed, even when he can provide no verifications of this contact.  Just make sure you avoid the devastating critiques of discerning writers outside the Ghetto.   For ecample, "God" gets the name of the author of ACIM wrong (Helen Schucman).  When confronted on this, Walsch claims that "God" gave him the correct name by he made the mistake of writing down the false name he recalled.   Duh!   God affirms all the tired New Age bromdes and offers nothing new.   Just remember this: you are not allowed to ask why God would not authenticate His authorship by offering a few scientific or mediical breakthroughs.   Or maybe God could have told us where Jimmy Hoffa's body is buried.  Walsch views this criticism wtth contempt and dismisses it as a vulgarization of divine revelation.  Hah!  Duh Bears, I apologize for urging you to read discerning books outside the Ghetto.  As Jack Nicholson put it, You can't handle the truth!

Don

P.S.  And with a disgruntled Lance Briggs and the loss of starters like Thomas Jones, your Bears wills suck next year too!  
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Gman
Full Member
***
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 105
Re: Is Conversations With God a good book to read?
Reply #16 - Apr 22nd, 2007 at 4:29am
 
Berserk wrote on Apr 22nd, 2007 at 12:11am:
Duh Bears,

This is the perfect book for th myopic New Age Ghetto that imagines (1) that all dreams of the recently deceased are actual visits from them, (2) that all dreams of leaving the body are genuine OBEs, and (3) that any New Age kook who claims to speak for God should be believed, even when he can provide no verifications of this contact.  Just make sure you avoid the devastating critiques of discerning writers outside the Ghetto.   For ecample, "God" gets the name of the author of ACIM wrong (Helen Schucman).  When confronted on this, Walsch claims that "God" gave him the correct name by he made the mistake of writing down the false name he recalled.   Duh!   God affirms all the tired New Age bromdes and offers nothing new.   Just remember this: you are not allowed to ask why God would not authenticate His authorship by offering a few scientific or mediical breakthroughs.   Or maybe God could have told us where Jimmy Hoffa's body is buried.  Walsch views this criticism wtth contempt and dismisses it as a vulgarization of divine revelation.  Hah!  Duh Bears, I apologize for urging you to read discerning books outside the Ghetto.  As Jack Nicholson put it, You can't handle the truth!

Don

P.S.  And with a disgruntled Lance Briggs and the loss of starters like Thomas Jones, your Bears wills suck next year too! 


Does not God talk to all devout christians, Don??...And why has not any of your brainwashed
crowd given us the whereabouts of Hoffa's body or medical breakthroughts???!!!! What has
your god told you lately? Any tips on the stock exchange? How about asking him who really
killed kennedy?...As usual the christian dictatorship's feedback from god is somewhere
between O and 1% ...Gman. ps. Has any passed saints given us any new scientific breakthroughs from the big boss above????
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
LaffingRain
Super Member
*****
Offline


Choose this Day

Posts: 5249
Arizona
Gender: female
Re: Is Conversations With God a good book to read?
Reply #17 - Apr 22nd, 2007 at 2:23pm
 
Say George, I never heard of Walsh saying that either and I'm not wasting my time to search for it.  but here's an idea: anytime that someone, anyone at all, even JC, gains a noteriety in the public eye, they will be either slain outright by opposers who make up lies, or the rumors will kill their popularity, at which time they've done their life work and can safely exit stage left and go home to a place where no more lies take place and everybody knows everything instantly.
just ask PeeWee Herman.

just the way it is.
Back to top
 

... Who takes away death's sting deprives life of bitterness
WWW http://www.facebook.com/LaughingRain2  
IP Logged
 
Berserk
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 979
Gender: male
Re: Is Conversations With God a good book to read?
Reply #18 - Apr 22nd, 2007 at 3:25pm
 
[Gman:] "Does not God talk to all devout christians, Don??...And why has not any of your brainwashed crowd given us the whereabouts of Hoffa's body?"
______________________________________________________________

Sensibly enough, the Bible never claims that we can identify God with the voice in the back of our head and converse with Him.  The Bible offers us 3 basic types of divine inspiration.  (1) Prophetic inspiration basically deals with this question: Do our external religious pretenses really relfect an inner spiritual  transformation?  If not, what must we do to make our spirituality real?  Even the prophetic word of knowledge deals with hidden spiritual conditions, not with the location of Jimmy Hoffa's corpse.   (2) The divine inspiration that derives from "the word of wisdom" is mediated through lessons learned in the school of hard knocks.   (3) God also speaks to us in the sense that He helps us apply His biblical messages to our experience.   In all cases, Christian claims of divine inspiration need to be subject to careful discernment from the corporate body of Christ and are inevitably interfused with very human interpretations that can lead to distortions.  In other words, unlike New Age kookery, Christian claims  of divine inspiration are ever cognizant of the potential for self-delusion.


[Gman:] "What has your god told you lately?"
_________________________________________

Two days ago, I felt the need to expose the absurdity of Alysia's claim that atheist Howard Storm was a dumb masochist who chose to go to Hell.   Just before I was about to post, I felt the impulse to turn on my TV.  There was Howard Storm discussing his NDE ordeal in Hell!  This was the first time I've ever heard him speak!

A couple of weeks prior, Roger (Rondele) posted on actor Telly Savalas's paranormal experience of being picked up on a rainy night and driven to a gas station.   He later learns that the driver had died in a car accident the previous year.  Telly is able to provide the driver's mother with awesome verifcations that the driver was indeed her son.  I was going to post my online reply about this, when I felt a strong impulse to turn on my TV.  The screen was immediately filled with Telly Savalas, an actor I haven't seen in many years since the Kojak series ended.

Is God speaking to me through such synchronicities?  Is God perhaps telling me that these paranormal experiences are genuine?   I must reply with the three words you rarely hear New Age Ghetlo members utter: "I don't know."  Perhaps.  

The one time God clearly spoke to me in my youth was an incident of intense spiritual ecstasy in an outdoor amphitheatre at a Christian camp.  I was initially by myself in the dark, but a crowd soon gathered because they saw my face glowing in the dark.  I asked them why they were there because their presence struck me as odd. And what did God say to me?  He told me that my theology was flawed, but that it was not in my best interests to have Him directly clear up my misunderstandings.  He implied that my instincts were good and that I needed to passionately live my burning questions and find my own answers that way.   By doing so, I had the chance to integrate my "answers" into a vibrant spirituality that made a difference and was more than a mere head trip.  In other words, despite the rich blessings my Pentecostal background had provided, God told me to leave my Christian Ghetto and seek out alternative intellectually respectable perspectives.  That divine edict prompted me to get my MDiv from Princeton and my doctorate from Harvard in Theology.  At the same time, I also immersed myself in New Age thought.  So when I press you to leave the New Age Ghetto and seek out challenging alternative perspectives, I speak from a personal sense of divine calling.

Don
Back to top
« Last Edit: Apr 22nd, 2007 at 7:28pm by Berserk »  
 
IP Logged
 
Rondele
Ex Member


Re: Is Conversations With God a good book to read?
Reply #19 - Apr 22nd, 2007 at 6:06pm
 
George is right to reject this book.  Its title really should be "Conversations With Myself."  It is not only a cheap knock-off of ACIM (as is Disappearance of the Universe) but it is also a self serving diatribe wherein Walsch tries to exonerate himself of things he did in his past.  Anyone with an ounce of discernment will toss this book into the nearest trash bin.

Here is just one excerpt of a reviewer's comment about the book:

"Perhaps the most blatant misuse of the Bible is the recasting of the Ten Commandments into the Ten Commitments. These Commitments include the idea that taking God's name in vain means that we don't understand the power of words. We are to honor the Mother/Father God and “all life forms”; and that coveting your neighbor's spouse makes no sense because we know that “all others are your spouse.” God adds benevolently that these are ten freedoms, because he does not order us around. He just tells us that these commitments are “signs” indicating we have found God."

Ok folks here are the facts:  Walsch was a notorious womanizer in his early days.  No wonder his "god" tells him that it's ok to screw around with someone else's wife.  He himself did that before he wrote this pile of garbage.

The new age mentality thinks that anything and everything is true as long as it's channeled.  They don't stop and think.  Their ability to discern fact from fiction is compromised.

George, you are wise to stay away from this crap.  I read it a few summers ago at the beach, and the first half was pretty good.  It totally breaks down, however, in the second half.  In fact sometimes I think the new agers who embrace this nonsense just skim through things without even realizing how absurd the stuff really is.

Again, ask yourself what motivation is behind the material.  Walsch uses his mythical conversation in order to absolve himself and others from all sorts of perverted abuses.  Any amateur psychologist would know right off the bat what Walsch is trying to do.  The pity is that so many people are bamboozled.

P.T. Barnum was right.

R
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
EternalEssence
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 127
Re: Is Conversations With God a good book to read?
Reply #20 - Apr 22nd, 2007 at 7:25pm
 
DaBears,

My recommendation is that you read the book and report what your impressions. Everyone who reads the book will form an opinon of it from their nature. Take what you can from the book and disregard anything that does not ring true. By reading the book, any book, you are not saying that you agree with the author, but you may still find small pearls of wisdom in the words.

E.
Smiley
Back to top
 

The elegance of the final produce belies the chaos of its construction.
 
IP Logged
 
recoverer
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 5027
Gender: male
Re: Is Conversations With God a good book to read?
Reply #21 - Apr 23rd, 2007 at 1:06pm
 
Eternal Essence:

There's a short coming in what you say. Please consider this before I explain. I used to belong to a group that was led by a guru. His group was filled with many well meaning and loving people. Many of them were quite intelligent. While in the group most of these members were certain this guru was enlightened. He put on a good show. Most of them have left his group and are certain that he isn't enlightened. They woke up from the fog he put them in when they found out about the numerous ways in which his life didn't match his teachings. He pretended to be something he wasn't.

I've been observing what gurus from both this conntry and other countries have been doing for about 24 years. Time after time I find that gurus aren't what they claim to be. Each of them is able to compile a flock of well meaning, loving and often intelligent followers. Why are they able to do so? Because out of the goodness of their hearts their followers find it hard to believe that a person who speaks well about things such as God and love could be a fake.

This is a difficulty I worked hard to get over.   Something I witnessed at my work helped me do so. I worked with a lady who was always concerned about her husband cheating on her. I found this odd because he didn't seem like a person who would cheat. Later on I found out why she was so concerned. Because she cheated on him. Her cheating framework of mind didn't allow her to understand how somebody else could be faithful. In a similar manner, my lack of mental tendencies that would enable me to become a fake guru made it hard for me to understand how somebody else could do so.

The reason I shared the above is to show that discernment doesn't always come just like that. Just as many people such as myself weren't able to discriminate about gurus until we became wise about them, many people aren't going to be able to discriminate about channeled sources until they have the knowledge to do so.

Just as I feel compelled to warn people about gurus, I feel compelled to warn them about questionable channeled sources. It can take years to get rid of the false concepts one picks up from a false source of information.  Not everybody has to learn the hard way, as many people do.

On the other hand, people can say everything is kumbaya, nothing is real.


EternalEssence wrote on Apr 22nd, 2007 at 7:25pm:
DaBears,

My recommendation is that you read the book and report what your impressions. Everyone who reads the book will form an opinon of it from their nature. Take what you can from the book and disregard anything that does not ring true. By reading the book, any book, you are not saying that you agree with the author, but you may still find small pearls of wisdom in the words.

E.
Smiley

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
AhSoLaoTsuAhhOmmra
Ex Member


Re: Is Conversations With God a good book to read?
Reply #22 - Apr 23rd, 2007 at 2:04pm
 
recoverer wrote on Apr 20th, 2007 at 7:09pm:
I've only perused several of his "many" books in books stores and local libraries.  Some warning bells went off. At one point when Walsch mentions something about ACIM, God supposedly states "I put that in there."  When asked about ascended masters, Yogananda was one that God supposedly named. I ran into a few other things like this and decided to wait until God himself tells me that the "many" books Walsch put together and most certainly made "lots" of money with, came from him.

Regarding God's supposed support of Yogananda, here's a thread from another forum by people who have been around the block with the guru thing.

http://www.kundalini-support.com/forum/index.php/topic,1550.0.html


  Wow, didn't know all that about Yogananda.  I mostly enjoyed (but definitely did not agree with all of) his Autobiography of Yogi and assumed he was the real deal, though not a master or fully enlightened.  


  Do you know anything about Sri Aubinado?   A person whom i've clashed on the personality/ego level with a lot in this and other lives (it seems), spoke very highly of this particular teacher, but since he spoke highly of Alice Bailey and her teachings (enough to recommend them), i'm not to sure about his powers of discrimination to begin with.    

 From what little i do know of Sri A., he was supposedly involved with a group which condoned and perhaps practiced political violence before he became a guru type.   When i asked the above person of how could such a supposedly spiritually developed person partake of such things even into their mid 20's, and not know that was wrong on some level be on the same spiritual page as someone like Yeshua who knew such things seemingly pretty early on, i got silence.   Earlier he had said that not only did he consider Sri A. an incarnated Avatar but also one of the highest masters.   That's some pretty high praise there.

 My question is concerning these proclaimed enlightened ones, is why do all of them age and die?   From various psychic sources which i respect like some from TMI or Cayce, most of thesel indicate that a very intune, balanced and loving person will stop aging "normally", and an automatic revitalization of their body-physical starts to happen, hence they experience sickenss, disease, aging, etc. less and less and radiant, vibrant health more and more.  If they get intune enough like Yeshua, they will trancend physical death completely and be in this world but not of it, so to speak.  

  Anyways, thanks for the eye-opener concerning Yogananda, it was somewhat disillusioning but necessary.   Thankfully though, i never got to much into him other than reading that one book and thinking he was probably much more intune than the average person.  

 Stuff like this, shows how important discrimination  and balancing the right brain with the left brain is.  
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
recoverer
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 5027
Gender: male
Re: Is Conversations With God a good book to read?
Reply #23 - Apr 23rd, 2007 at 3:18pm
 
Ah so said:   Do you know anything about Sri Aubinado?   A person whom i've clashed on the personality/ego level with a lot in this and other lives (it seems), spoke very highly of this particular teacher, but since he spoke highly of Alice Bailey and her teachings (enough to recommend them), i'm not to sure about his powers of discrimination to begin with.    

 From what little i do know of Sri A., he was supposedly involved with a group which condoned and perhaps practiced political violence before he became a guru type.   When i asked the above person of how could such a supposedly spiritually developed person partake of such things even into their mid 20's, and not know that was wrong on some level be on the same spiritual page as someone like Yeshua who knew such things seemingly pretty early on, i got silence.   Earlier he had said that not only did he consider Sri A. an incarnated Avatar but also one of the highest masters.   That's some pretty high praise there.

 My question is concerning these proclaimed enlightened ones, is why do all of them age and die?   From various psychic sources which i respect like some from TMI or Cayce, most of thesel indicate that a very intune, balanced and loving person will stop aging "normally", and an automatic revitalization of their body-physical starts to happen, hence they experience sickenss, disease, aging, etc. less and less and radiant, vibrant health more and more.  If they get intune enough like Yeshua, they will trancend physical death completely and be in this world but not of it, so to speak.  

"Even though I've known about Aurobindo for years, I've never read any of his teachings or come accross anything that is negative.

Ah so said:  Anyways, thanks for the eye-opener concerning Yogananda, it was somewhat disillusioning but necessary.   Thankfully though, i never got to much into him other than reading that one book and thinking he was probably much more intune than the average person.  

 Stuff like this, shows how important discrimination  and balancing the right brain with the left brain is.

"Good statement about balancing the right brain with the left. Otherwise everything is kumbaya. Regarding the Avatar thing, fake gurus use it as a oneupmanship thing. In India, if you're an Avatar, you're not just a self realized master like other gurus or a piece of God like the rest of us, you're God himself incarnate.  There are a number of gurus who have claimed such a thing without it being true. For example, Sai Baba who used to molest the male children of his followers. Some gurus don't start out as Avatars, but later announce that they are one. Adi Da (Da Free John, and numerous other names), Yogananda, and I believe Sri Chinmoy and Rajneesh (Osho) are a few gurus who have done this. I guess they get to the point where they feel the pedestal their followers put them on isn't high enough. Sometimes followers will give their guru this title-sometimes after their guru has passed away. I don't know where the avatar thing started for Aurobindo.  Whatever the case, if a guru has been around long enough, it is liable to come up.

Regarding the appointing thing, there was a lady who visited this forum for a short while, and at another forum she wrote that Sai Baba, Bill Gates and somebody else (I think Mother Theresa) are avatars. Bill Gates? Perhaps she doesn't understand what the original meaning of the term is.

You're welcome for the Yogananda info.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Apr 23rd, 2007 at 7:10pm by recoverer »  
 
IP Logged
 
EternalEssence
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 127
Re: Is Conversations With God a good book to read?
Reply #24 - Apr 23rd, 2007 at 8:41pm
 
recoverer,

First, let me say that this post comes after the previous post and the flavor of it is somewhat different. I feel it as different, because in this post, you come across as a person speaking from experience and it shines through with its own conveyance of truth.

I understand your experience and I can only infer that you wished someone had told you then what you know now, which is what you wished to accomplish. Did the experience make you a bad person? A better one? The event and the people are secondary to what you obtained as a result of that experience. I, too, have experiences that I would love to prevent others from going through, but it is not my place. I know, without doubt, that there is a reason for it.  

Do I believe that everyone works for the betterment of others? No. Do I believe that there is a reason for what happens. Yes. From what I can ascertain of your post, you retained your ability to reason rather than following blindly in the footsteps of another. I do not blind following, but encourage experience and a healthy dose of intellectual curiosity. I am a living, breathing creature, born from light to which I will eventually return. I speak only from my experience, because it is my truth. It is not the only truth, because by its nature a truth can never be untrue.

For what it is worth, I had a similar experience with the cheating scenario, but the sexes were reversed.

I understand the why of your caveats on sources of material; however, what is the personal responsibility of those who allow themselves to be swept away by gurus? Not one channeled source of material, not even my higher self, has ever stated that I should follow their way. If anything, I have been forced to work harder to learn to reason and to draw from them what rings true for me and to disregard other material.

My recommendation of this book did not come with a "This is the way." but only "I recommend you read it." Only by reading it, does one gain a personal perspective that they can share, an experience they can offer, much like your experiences with gurus. Once experienced, in whatever form, it can be discussed, which is what forms the basis of this forum.

Thank you for sharing.

E.
Smiley
Back to top
 

The elegance of the final produce belies the chaos of its construction.
 
IP Logged
 
DaBears
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 254
Re: Is Conversations With God a good book to read?
Reply #25 - Apr 23rd, 2007 at 10:15pm
 
EternalEssence wrote on Apr 23rd, 2007 at 8:41pm:
recoverer,

First, let me say that this post comes after the previous post and the flavor of it is somewhat different. I feel it as different, because in this post, you come across as a person speaking from experience and it shines through with its own conveyance of truth.

I understand your experience and I can only infer that you wished someone had told you then what you know now, which is what you wished to accomplish. Did the experience make you a bad person? A better one? The event and the people are secondary to what you obtained as a result of that experience. I, too, have experiences that I would love to prevent others from going through, but it is not my place. I know, without doubt, that there is a reason for it.  

Do I believe that everyone works for the betterment of others? No. Do I believe that there is a reason for what happens. Yes. From what I can ascertain of your post, you retained your ability to reason rather than following blindly in the footsteps of another. I do not blind following, but encourage experience and a healthy dose of intellectual curiosity. I am a living, breathing creature, born from light to which I will eventually return. I speak only from my experience, because it is my truth. It is not the only truth, because by its nature a truth can never be untrue.

For what it is worth, I had a similar experience with the cheating scenario, but the sexes were reversed.

I understand the why of your caveats on sources of material; however, what is the personal responsibility of those who allow themselves to be swept away by gurus? Not one channeled source of material, not even my higher self, has ever stated that I should follow their way. If anything, I have been forced to work harder to learn to reason and to draw from them what rings true for me and to disregard other material.

My recommendation of this book did not come with a "This is the way." but only "I recommend you read it." Only by reading it, does one gain a personal perspective that they can share, an experience they can offer, much like your experiences with gurus. Once experienced, in whatever form, it can be discussed, which is what forms the basis of this forum.

Thank you for sharing.

E.
Smiley

I am going to read this book no matter what people say or think about it..
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
LaffingRain
Super Member
*****
Offline


Choose this Day

Posts: 5249
Arizona
Gender: female
Re: Is Conversations With God a good book to read?
Reply #26 - Apr 24th, 2007 at 12:09am
 
good for you Alex! read everything you can get your hands on and own yourself!
the power is within to listen to your guidance of what rings true in the heart.
if you ever get an uneasy feeling when you are reading something, you might want to listen to what your feelings are telling you and read something else. If on the other hand you are connecting with the material and your mind and heart are resonating in joy to it, I'd go with that.  theres a book for everyone out there no matter what part of the path home they are on and we don't all read or support the same books as you may have noticed! Smiley

Thanks for your post EE. I like the way you communicate yourself. love, alysia
Back to top
 

... Who takes away death's sting deprives life of bitterness
WWW http://www.facebook.com/LaughingRain2  
IP Logged
 
DaBears
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 254
Re: Is Conversations With God a good book to read?
Reply #27 - Apr 24th, 2007 at 9:10pm
 
LaffingRain wrote on Apr 24th, 2007 at 12:09am:
good for you Alex! read everything you can get your hands on and own yourself!
the power is within to listen to your guidance of what rings true in the heart.
if you ever get an uneasy feeling when you are reading something, you might want to listen to what your feelings are telling you and read something else. If on the other hand you are connecting with the material and your mind and heart are resonating in joy to it, I'd go with that.  theres a book for everyone out there no matter what part of the path home they are on and we don't all read or support the same books as you may have noticed! Smiley

Thanks for your post EE. I like the way you communicate yourself. love, alysia


Yeah, I feel the same way you do about listening to my heart and feelings! BTW EE you are a great poster and need to post more often!!
peace
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Berserk
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 979
Gender: male
Re: Is Conversations With God a good book to read?
Reply #28 - Apr 24th, 2007 at 10:30pm
 
Yo Alex,

you also promised you were going to read Malachi Martin's "Hostage to the Devil" and Johanna Michaelson's "The Beautiful Side of Evil"  (2 books not recommended by the New Age Ghetto).  Were you just lying or are you sitll planning to keep your promise in your own good time?

Don the Nagger
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
DaBears
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 254
Re: Is Conversations With God a good book to read?
Reply #29 - Apr 24th, 2007 at 11:19pm
 
Berserk wrote on Apr 24th, 2007 at 10:30pm:
Yo Alex,

you also promised you were going to read Malachi Martin's "Hostage to the Devil" and Johanna Michaelson's "The Beautiful Side of Evil"  (2 books not recommended by the New Age Ghetto).  Were you just lying or are you sitll planning to keep your promise in your own good time?

Don the Nagger

No, I am not going to read them.. Now that I have looked at the reviews from posters at amazon.com.. I have read many books on demons already.. I don't believe in demons so I don't want to waste my time reading about demons that don't exist..

peace
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Send Topic Print


This is a Peer Moderated Forum. You can report Posting Guideline violations.