Copyrighted Logo

css menu by Css3Menu.com


 

Bruce's 5th book, a Home Study Course, is now available.
Books & Tapes by Bruce Moen
    Bruce's Blog now at http://www.afterlife-knowledge.com/blog....

  HomeHelpSearchLoginRegister  
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
introduction of a confused one. (Read 3435 times)
daan
New Member
*
Offline



Posts: 35
netherlands
Gender: male
introduction of a confused one.
Jun 22nd, 2006 at 1:49am
 
Hi All, I'm new here, so I'll introduce myself first. I'm Daan, 31 years old, living in Holland. Like almost everyone here I've been (and still am in some way) very reserved about things according afterlife and non physical things. But I've had a few strange things going on since I was a kid. It started when "someone" told me a year in advance that I had to enjoy the christmas at my grandma's, because it was going to be the last one. I didn't pay a lot of attention to it then, but one year later, 2nd X-mas day, she went over.
The second one was an out of body experience, whilst asleep I dreamt that I was in WW2, in a plane which was shot down. Before the plane crashed, I felt like a huge vacuüm cleaner sucked me out of the plane. I knew I had died and was curious where I was going. When I opened my eyes, I was in my room, but I could see everything clear (though it was pitch dark). I woke up and was a bit confused to see nothing anymore. Only after I put on the light I recoughnised the out of body experience, because I saw it moments before without having to turn the light on.
Then, when I drove in my car, someone told me to hit the brakes really hard. I thought it was a stupid thing to do, because the traffic lights where still far away. As soon as I hit the brakes, on the other lane a big truck passed me with high speed and slammed it's brakes for an emergency stop at the traffic lights. the whole combination swept over to the lane I had stood when I didn't hit the brakes so early.
Later I fainted in the garden, but I didn't loose my spiritual conciousness, I was traveling somewhere when I heard my name from somewhere.. I was very surprized that I awoke in the earth of the garden, because I had never felt as beïng away..
The last one was that I overslept. I only overslept once in my life and that was on the morning that a ghost driver drove his car across the highway I had to use going to work. It crashed at 5,20 am in another car, exactly at 5.20 am I'm normally also on that place on the highway..

This is in short a bit of those strange things, which should clear the question "does afterlife excist" for me. But it doesn't. I feel my past away brother often, chat with him and know he's somewhere, but my mind doesn't want to accept that as a proof.

I've read a few things here and there, learned to relax and meditate, know about energy and see the "light" around a body, but I'm still in a stubborn "I'm not sure" situation.

On this board I hope to find that my experiences don't only excist in my brains.. I'm scientifically educated and I've learned not to accept things being "likely" or "possibly".
That's where I have the problem. Learning about experiences from others hopefully will shrink my hunger for proof and educate me to let loose the scientific part.

I also use energybuilding with meditation, but the last time it got so huge, that my body felt like I was connected to a wall socket. My fingers started to tingle first, later on my complete body started to shake and I felt the "sparks" in my fingers for about half an hour after. Is that something usual? (It was a very relaxing and pleasant feeling though)

Anyway, I'm glad to find a place where I can read about other one's experiences. Hopefully my doubt will shrink a bit, it's constantly there, like an annoying fly circling around in my head and it disturbs me in exploring a part of life which I would like to know better.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
betson
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 3445
SE USA
Gender: female
Re: introduction of a confused one.
Reply #1 - Jun 22nd, 2006 at 10:19am
 
Greetings daan,
     Your experiences provide a synopsis of many of the afterlife glimpses that are discussed here, --- except you've missed Bruce Moen's special method of retrieving lost or stuck souls, and thankfully, you've not had fears.  You are very fortunate, except that your education in science does not permit you full belief.
    Retrievals give purpose to our afterlife visits so that they are not surprising 'accidents.'  More importantly for science, retrievals will lead you ( maybe rather quickly in your case since you've been given so many experiences already) to find proof of your afterlife contacts, proof that exists in material reality (called C1 on these boards.)
     You could start with Bruce's last book to develop the skills and habits for visiting the afterlife "on command', so that this part of spiritual contact is no longer random. You will find your contact with your spiritual Helpers becomes more of a discussion than just random incidents too.
If your discussions with the people on this board is anywhere as wonderful as mine has been in the few months I've been here, You'll be very very glad you came!
Best wishes, Bets
Back to top
 

There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio,
Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.
Shakespeare
 
IP Logged
 
Antwnhs
Junior Member
**
Offline


Knowledge Seeker

Posts: 59
Gender: male
Re: introduction of a confused one.
Reply #2 - Jun 22nd, 2006 at 12:26pm
 
betson said

You are very fortunate, except that your education in science does not permit you full belief.


I don't believe that education in science has anything to do with developing a belief system...that would apply that the more ignorant you are in science the more a believer you'll be....don't forget that there were many scientist including nobel prize winners that did innovative research in the field of afterlife.
I believe it more has to do with the specific individual set of experiences and unique character of each person.
Back to top
 

LIFE IS OUR PLAYGROUND
 
IP Logged
 
daan
New Member
*
Offline



Posts: 35
netherlands
Gender: male
Re: introduction of a confused one.
Reply #3 - Jun 22nd, 2006 at 1:24pm
 
Thank you for the warm welcome. I'll try to get hands on the book, Bets, it sounds like something I could use. I've had fears, but I rely on Christ to keep me safe. If I feel threatened the thought of Christ bannes the threatening immediatly. In one meditation where I focussed on that energy I got blown up from inside with a huge sparkling and liquid white silver/gold energy. I couldn't hold that feeling for more then a few seconds; it was simply too big.

Since I know that this energy will keep me safe. I use the word Christ because that is the closest and most logical name for me to call for help. Others would choose their "saviour" to help. I was stunned though how willing that energy was to help me.
You would think that "He" has more to do then watching after experimentating human beings and certainly wouldn't show up after simply asking for guidance, but (and I'm not sure it is Christ or another very positive energy) it simply appeared and filled me up.

Science has certainly something to do with my hesitation to accept. I long for a measurable proof, like a voltmeter registering my growing energy-field (to give a very simple example).
To me, it's very strange to see that no-one notices any changes, whilst I see that my energyfield is starting to litterally glow while I'm in trance. When I used energy building at nightshifts I'm bursting and feel like floating, but my colleagues don't recoughnise anything, when passing some, they just say "hi" like always, but I feel substantial different.

It's therefore hard to accept that something is changing, no-one can confirm it, you can't measure it, it's only happening inside me. It gives insecurity about the correctness of my own perception and that is the thing which bothers me. It's only something I sense and no-one else, making me automatically think that I'm the odd one out.

That's why I'm happy to find a forum where I can read if my perceptions are confirmed by others. If you're not the only one, the chance of "braindamage" shrinks..
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
betson
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 3445
SE USA
Gender: female
Re: introduction of a confused one.
Reply #4 - Jun 23rd, 2006 at 10:04am
 
I apologized to antwhn on a PM but that still bothers me. I know scietific research is crucial and that some scientists are among the most avid seekers. I have no idea why I said they weren't.
Apologies, bets
Back to top
 

There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio,
Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.
Shakespeare
 
IP Logged
 
spooky2
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 2368
Re: introduction of a confused one.
Reply #5 - Jun 24th, 2006 at 9:08pm
 
Hi daan,
I have a scientific background and I've come to the conclusion that the subjects natural science is dealing with is limited. And this limitation is it why science has become such successful. But nevertheless, it is a cut of reality and for technical things as well as a sort of basic agreement system very useful, but it's not reality.
I give you some examples what is not a matter to natural science:
--HERE, NOW This is surprising I find. It isn't found in physics because it's a matter of subjective experience, and physics is about objectives. So also
--EXPERIENCES are not found in physics-based science. In the brain there are cells and a lot of chemical and physical activities, but no experiences. It's different categories. Don't let you fool by one who says the consiousness is a product of the brain. It's the other way round: The brain and the scientific concepts about it are part of consciousness.

If you philosophize sometime around that way, natural science will probably become just one of many things inside our/your consciousness, rather than being the fundamentation of it.

Good you came here. I tell you there are many amazing posts to read.

Spooky
Back to top
 

"I'm going where the pavement turns to sand"&&Neil Young, "Thrasher"
 
IP Logged
 
daan
New Member
*
Offline



Posts: 35
netherlands
Gender: male
Re: introduction of a confused one.
Reply #6 - Jun 26th, 2006 at 10:11am
 
Hai Spooky,
Those are interesting thoughts. I've discussed them some time ago on another board with some scientists who didn't believe in anything (well, actually they believed in being dead after dying.)
They came up with: The here and now experience is simply a byproduct of time. (since time is a byproduct of material movement) like a computer having a clock ticking; it knows what has been past, wat is present and what is future. Simply because the input data tells him so and because of it's ability to compare the data with the clock ticking, it can make up it's mind about the here and now.

Experience. Also a computer comparison. If the computer crashes due to an invalid input, it will remeber this construction in it's system data and will not make that mistake again. It has the ability to experience and make decisions on that.

If you start to think of it, there is a comparison to almost all sorts of situations we call spiritual, and if they can't give a explanation, it's simply "good luck" or "coincidence".

The harsh reality (or semingly hars reality) makes me hesitate sometimes to accept certain spiritual experiences, because it can also be explained without having to think of a spiritual realm. I'll have to learn and keep learning.

I have another "goal" for the spiritual world though; after trying to get in contact with my brother while meditating, an uncle I (shame on me!!) completely forgot about, appeared in my "dream" and we had a pleasant talk. He announced himself and I really am ashamed that between my grandpa's, grandma's and my brother I forgot about him..

However it's not a good thing forgetting to remind him, it made clear to me that HE was the one contacting!!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
sven_und_jen
New Member
*
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 28
Re: introduction of a confused one.
Reply #7 - Jun 26th, 2006 at 11:32am
 
"The harsh reality (or semingly hars reality) makes me hesitate sometimes to accept certain spiritual experiences, because it can also be explained without having to think of a spiritual realm. I'll have to learn and keep learning."

Yes, for me too..

Interesting story at the end of your message..
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
daan
New Member
*
Offline



Posts: 35
netherlands
Gender: male
Re: introduction of a confused one.
Reply #8 - Jun 27th, 2006 at 10:01am
 
I have something to add: it may be is not necessary to introduce a spiritual realm to explain certain experiences, but IT MAKES MORE SENSE if you do.

Everything in nature makes sense. A tree doesn't grow a branche accidentally, it grows a branche because it can catch more light that way. If you call every odd thing "accidents and coincidents" life is simple, but makes no sense.
It's odd that sience accepts the idea of unlogic and meaningless coincidences instead of figuring it would fit much better in their logical way of thinking if the coincidence had a logical purpose, like everything else.

In the discussion I had lately, the early braking urge I had was coincidence and lucky, nothing I could proove to say it was more then that. Now I add the spiritual part. The -to me- logic influence my "urge" had. Namely, not getting crushed by that truck.

That's the big reason why I'm on the side of afterlife; science has addapted a completely pointless view in a world where everything in the natural surrounding has purpose.


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
spooky2
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 2368
Re: introduction of a confused one.
Reply #9 - Jun 27th, 2006 at 7:54pm
 
Hi Daan,
about the computer-analogies, the point is all you can observe of a computer is how the electric processes are running/what the output is on a monitor or another device. This is the same viewpoint as if looking at the brain with it's processes. What never is observed and found that way are experiences in itself. The smart little trick of the scientists is to identify those physical processes with experiences, which is not correct. Without a proper causal connection between those processes and experiences we merely have correlations.

Scientists who are telling those things deny themselves, as they are denying the most evident facts of everyday's life, the existence of subjective experience, therefore the existence of subjects. Therefore, they deny their own science. It's really weird.

Spooky
Back to top
 

"I'm going where the pavement turns to sand"&&Neil Young, "Thrasher"
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print


This is a Peer Moderated Forum. You can report Posting Guideline violations.