Copyrighted Logo

css menu by Css3Menu.com


 

Bruce's 5th book, a Home Study Course, is now available.
Books & Tapes by Bruce Moen
    Bruce's Blog now at http://www.afterlife-knowledge.com/blog....

  HomeHelpSearchLoginRegister  
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
Direct Voice Mediumship (Read 7767 times)
Spitfire
Ex Member


Re: Direct Voice Mediumship
Reply #15 - Jan 9th, 2006 at 7:23pm
 
Quote:
"[Spit:] "Someone who can only insult with words is a coward--and cowards disgust me."
_______________________________

Ha!   Don't you wish I'd just offer ad hominems.  In fact, I've actually taught logic in college, though not for long.  It was not my specialization.   So if I engaged your arguments, I'd do so with ruthless logical precision.  I'd only make it personal if you did.   And as you can see, I enjoy holding up a mirror to rhetorical tactics like yours.  You can dish it out, but....Oh, why don't you just lighten up?   Grin
And why are so scared of fresh approaches to "the truth?"  

BTW, I used to be a soccer player and teammates considered me a confrontational kind of goon.  It wasn't by design though; I just kept hurting guys in awkward collisions I never anticipated.   But I wanted them to think it was deliberate!  Otherwise, they'd discover that I was just a tad clumsy!   I got injured sometimes too.

See you on March 1--or not!
Don


I fear few things, and i am open to any "fresh approachs to the truth" but you only like "the truth" when it fits in with your own "truth". Can you even entertain that god does'nt exist?.

Soccer aye?...a bit of shoving and leg to leg action, ive been an amatuer boxer for 5 years, im more used to broken jaws, and shattered eye sockets.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Berserk
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 979
Gender: male
Re: Direct Voice Mediumship
Reply #16 - Jan 9th, 2006 at 8:13pm
 
[Spit:] "Can you even entertain that God doesn't exist?"  
In my survey of your polemical posts,  I noticed one of your greatest debating weaknesses.   You make unjustified assumptions about your posting partners and their positions.   As I will perhaps demonstrate on March 1, your assumptions often cause your critique to unravel.  In logic we refer to this tendency as a lack of awareness of hidden premises.

In fact, I'm confident you've never met a poster as thoroughly trained in academic reasons NOT to believe in God.  Nothing is more devastating to faith than a PhD in religious studies from an Ivy league secular Religious Studies department.   One of the first things my professor/ advisor told me was: "You won't find many Jesus fans around here."   In debates, you must keep your assumptions close to the vest until they are borne out in your opponents' statements.  Otherwise, you just lead with your chin.  As an ex-boxer, you know that's a bad idea.  

BTW, another of your false assumptions seems to be that I'm mainly interested in winning.   In fact, I'm only interested in expanding the horizons of those I engage.   Your posts often criticize what you obviously don't understand (e.g. biblical teaching).  The first crucial step in a serious spiritual quest is an acknowledgement of what you don't know.  Most debaters blur the line between what they do and don't know.   Without that acknowledgement, there is no lasting growth.    

That does not mean you need to be shy and restrained.  Rather, you need to begin your posts with phrases like, "My understanding of biblical teaching about God is..."  No shame in that.   That way you open the door to correcting your misunderstanding.  Then ask more questions until you are confident you've grasped the point at issue.  Then, of course, you may or may not like the corrected version of the teaching.  

If you follow these two guidelines on March 1, our discussion may actually be quite cordial and productive.  I've summarized my overall position before and will briefly do it again.  In life theological understanding is the booby prize because it offers just enough spirituality to inoculate you against the real thing.  Personal experience of the divine is everything.  Living vicariously off of other people's miracle stories just creates a 2nd-hand spirituality that severely limits growth potential.   I share such stories not as an end, but only to evoke wonder and excite people's spiritual quest towards the transforming experiences that make the decisive difference.    

Don

P.S.  I may or may not stick around until March 1.    I still don't like "rats."   And I know it wasn't you.        
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jan 10th, 2006 at 3:49pm by Berserk »  
 
IP Logged
 
DocM
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 2168
Re: Direct Voice Mediumship
Reply #17 - Jan 9th, 2006 at 9:01pm
 
I too did not alert the administration.  However, I still think you (Don) could have thrown down the gauntlet/glove without the personal stuff.

To get back to the point.  I think that anyone who posts on this site with regularity eventually will show an open mind toward mystical expiences.  Even Spitfire.  Look at you, Spit now talking of spirits saying you hear they can't see their hands (on the other thread).  This from a sceptic who did not admit to belief in anything other than what he could touch/see/fee/hear/ or have proven in a controlled environment.

I like Don's idea that voice mediumship may be more rare due to it being a more difficult skill to cultivate. 

I'm not sure, if people do ascend to higher planes, then it would make sense to me that those best able to communicate would be those recently passed or closer to the earth plane (Focus 27 and under - especially Focus 23).  As one's ideas and perceptions change, one might imagine that manipulating media in the physical C1 plane might be more difficult to accomplish.  Just a theory.  That you must feel tied to the physical to want to communicate with the physical - to converse - the art of conversation about earthly matters takes a spirit who still, to some extent identifies with earthly things.  Of course Flint says he channeled Gandhi - someone who was selfless, full of love, and should be sitting on the right hand side of the lord almighty.  So maybe I'm wrong....if it were real.

Wilde says in his tapes that he doesn't want to disappoint anyone, but that his life on the other side is much like it was before his death.  Hmmm... and that Chopin still composes!

I am not sure what to make of it all.  In another post, I answered Spit's quesiton about my own experiences.  But I still feel many here have a yearning to explore more, travel more, in meditation and otherwise, and let their consciousness roam free.  We are all still very much a part of this reality though as the conflicts on the board show.

Matthew
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Spitfire
Ex Member


Re: Direct Voice Mediumship
Reply #18 - Jan 9th, 2006 at 9:30pm
 
Quote:
[Spit:] "Can you even entertain that God doesn't exist?"  
In my survey of your polemical posts,  I noticed one of your greatest debating weaknesses.   You make unjustified assumptions about your posting partners and their positions.   As I will perhaps demonstrate on March 1, your assumptions often cause your critique to unravel.  In logic we refer to this tendency as a lack of awareness of hidden premises.

In fact, I'm confident you've never met a poster as thoroughly trained in academic reasons NOT to believe in God.  Nothing is more devastating to faith than a PhD in religious studies from an Ivy league secular Religious Studies department.   One of the first things my professor/ advisor told me was: "You won't find many Jesus fans around here."   In debates, you must keep your assumptions close to the vest until they are borne out in your oppoents' statements.  Otherwise, you just lead with your chin.  As an ex-boxer, you know that's a bad idea.  

BTW, another of your false assumptions seems to be that I'm mainly interested in winning.   In fact, I'm only interested in expanding the horizons of those I engage.   Your posts often criticize what you obviously don't understand (e.g. biblical teaching).  The first crucial step in a serious spiritual quest is an acknowledgement of what you don't know.  Most debaters blur the line between what they do and don't know.   Without that acknowledgement, there is no lasting growth.    

That does not mean you need to be shy and restrained.  Rather, you need to begin your posts with phrases like, "My understanding of biblical teaching about God is..."  No shame in that.   That way you open the door to correcting your misunderstanding.  Then ask more questions until you are confident you've grasped the point at issue.  Then, of course, you may or may not like the corrected version of the teaching.  

If you follow these two guidelines on March 1, our disciussion may actually be quite cordial and productive.  I've summarized my overall position before and will briefly do it again.  In life theological understanding is the booby prize because it offers just enough spirituality to inoculate you against the real thing.  Personal experience of the divine is everything.  Living vicariously off of other people's miracle stories just creates a 2nd-hand spirituality that severely limits growth potential.   I share such stories not as an end, but only to evoke wonder and excite people's spiritual quest towards the transforming experiences that make the decisive difference.    

Don

P.S.  I may or may not stick around until March 1.    I still don't like "rats."   And I know it wasn't you.        


We all make assumptions. Yes i make assumptions, just like you do. And as you have even in your last post, such as

"'Imconfident you've never met a poster as thoroughly trained in academic reasons NOT to believe in God."

"BTW, another of your false assumptions seems to be that I'm mainly interested in winning.


You say you wish to expand others horizons, but after your polemical posts it seems your not willing to expand your own?.

As i have said on pervious posts, im not versed on the full bible, nor do i wish to be, it does not intrest me in the slightest, i do not believe it will enhance my "spiritual growth", therefore it's a waste of my time.

I cant be bothered to bounce back and foreward with 10000 word essays, "my understanding of the biblical teachings about god is...." can be nicely condensed to "God is...". You can save that for your academic papers.

Personal experience of the divine is everything. I have had none, the majoirty of the population has had none. How can you even try to convince others of a god, when it comes down to personal experience?, unless you can give me his phone number, and i can verify myself?

If second hand accounts limit spiritual growth, why do people base there lives upon the bible?

Would you even know about god without second hand accounts, the answer is no.

Tell me what "personal experiences" of god, convinced you of his/it's existance, i would be very intrested.

You said you were not gonna post until march the 1st. Since you have broken your word, i would recomend you "unleash" whatever you have now as i see no point for you to wait.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Berserk
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 979
Gender: male
Re: Direct Voice Mediumship
Reply #19 - Jan 9th, 2006 at 11:52pm
 
Spit,

A few years ago, I was attending an obligatory conference of United Methodist ministers.  Our superintendent boomed: "Don't make premature assumptions about people.  When you ass/u/me, you make an `ass' of `u' and `me.'"   It was a very conservative crowd; so I was shocked that he said this.  But I like his illustration.  

I like to be up front about each assumption so that they can be affirmed or denied.   Discussion proceeds effectively only if everyone's assumptions are clarified.   As you shall see, my own quest is open-ended with many loose ends.   We are both fellow travelers here.  

Like most Christians, you've displayed some understandable misconceptions about biblical teaching.  Don't worry.  I won't subject you to long lectures.  What I ordinarily prefer to do is to offer simple summaries.  Only when someone wants to challenge me do I prooftext my points in detail.  But as I said, it's experiences of the divine that you want--or at least paranormal experiences that demonstrate your potential for life-changing mystical experiences.    In this respect, I take the approach that has worked for myself and others in the past.   This involves a hefty dose of my own paranormal experiences and the questions they raise.   One must spproach spiritual issues in such a way that key cognitive barriers are removed.   You might be surprised at how easy it is to do this.

In couple of days, I fly across the continent to central British Columbia for 3 weeks.  My trip is part of the reason I want to postpone in depth discussion until March 1.   As you think of it, you might formulate a series of questions or contentions that seem important to you.  Believe or not, apart from certain basics, I prefer not to set the agenda for other people's quest.  But as I said, I've already collected several of your questions and comments from other posts.  Presumably, you would like me to begin with those.  My goal is not to get you to share my outlook or believe my spiritual experiences, but to help you have your own self-authenticating experiences.    

Dpn

Back to top
« Last Edit: Jan 10th, 2006 at 3:53pm by Berserk »  
 
IP Logged
 
B-dawg
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 596
Missoula, Montana
Gender: male
If you're loking for a "rat", Don...
Reply #20 - Jan 10th, 2006 at 12:48am
 
You'll have to blame Bruce M. for that one I'm
afraid... he's been keeping up pretty well with
threads he doesn't like/thinks are in the wrong
place. (He's slapped my hand a time or two lately.)
A "rat"? What's up with this anway? You sound paranoid, buddy.
You'd better be packing some serious philosophical
artillery on March 1, Don... otherwise I fear you're
wasting your time. (And NO more name-calling, if
you please.) And Don...
I have yet to hear the Christian apologetic that I
couldn't demolish (or at least de-fang) in a sentence or two. Unlike your average "pool hall atheist" or tabloid/Reader's Digest-reading schlub, I've got my Christian theology down pretty well.
Just lettin' ya know...
BTW, those "self authenticating experiences" you speak of had better be more than listening to Christians tell their miracle stories, combined with "fear-tizzies" invoked by threats of Hell-fire. They'd better not involve resorting to FAITH either, or so much as the merest whiff of legalistic "rationalizing." Otherwise, they'll just go into my "mental trash-bin" along with Rapture theology and all the other arguments people have thrown at me since I was 16 years old...

B-man
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print


This is a Peer Moderated Forum. You can report Posting Guideline violations.