Quote:Can we ever be complete within self? I don't think we are ever complete because we are always growing and changing.
And I think people can be there for us,
but they will also be themselves with us.
I don't really understand impersonality, perhaps. What does that word mean?
love, blink
Complete in the sense of no ego. We never lose our sense of individuality, even when we are completely PUL filled and Source immersed.
Its the ego that needs the support from others, the pats on the back, etc., etc. and their is nothing wrong with this... Yet at some point, we all must get past this illusionary self, and merge it in with the True Self...
This is what the Ascension, that some many have talked about, is all about.
Impersonality, is akin to selflessness. Its caring more about others, than ourselves and in that lies our "salvation"--this is what PUL is, selflessness (though there is individuality) vs. self over others. This was shown to a very pure degree by the man Yeshua, and his two main prayers in life where, "Not my will be done, but Thy Will Father be done in and through me."
His other constant prayer was simply, "Others Father, always others"
Impersonality is also detachment, and is much like the Buddha's teachings about impermence, and how attachment to the unreal is what causes suffering... Its so true.. Could both Buddha and Yeshua be wrong...
Tis a hard concept to grasp, and even harder to live it, but it is our True Self and the practice is the the way to True Self.
These are my beliefs, i don't expect anyone to believe them, take what resonates with you.
With Love