Copyrighted Logo

css menu by Css3Menu.com


 

Bruce's 5th book, a Home Study Course, is now available.
Books & Tapes by Bruce Moen
    Bruce's Blog now at http://www.afterlife-knowledge.com/blog....

  HomeHelpSearchLoginRegister  
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
The 'Sea of Stars' and the Intermissive Period (Read 2403 times)
Kyo
Ex Member


The 'Sea of Stars' and the Intermissive Period
Feb 13th, 2005 at 11:19pm
 
A month ago, I had posted on a friend's mistrust of channeling :

http://www.afterlife-knowledge.com/cgi-afterlife-knowledge/yabb/YaBB.cgi?board=a...


I had suggested the possibility of this deep seated mistrust as an issue that goes back many lifetimes. This phenomenon (of issues repeating themselves over lifetimes) is better understood when one considers the purpose of physical incarnations.

She has since delved into her past lives (her capacity to do so is remarkable) via the "Hall of Records", and the result is a deepening of her understanding of her mistrust towards channeling.

Another interesting description in her accounts, involve a 'Sea of Stars' that she encounters repeatedly in the intermissive period (ie. the period in between lifetimes, in the extraphysical or 'spirit world').

Some of you might may find this 'Sea of Stars' to be familiar.

For those interested, her account is posted here :

http://infinity.hispeed.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1107709664/0#10
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freebird
Ex Member


Re: The 'Sea of Stars' and the Intermissive Period
Reply #1 - Feb 14th, 2005 at 12:47am
 
Quote:
I had suggested the possibility of this deep seated mistrust as an issue that goes back many lifetimes. This phenomenon (of issues repeating themselves over lifetimes) is better understood when one considers the purpose of physical incarnations.


I went ahead and clicked on the link you provided and read some of the discussion there about this issue.  I can only say that I believe this understanding of karma and reincarnation must be erroneous, if we are to have hope for the progress of the soul.

My reasoning is simple:  Even with a hundred, a thousand, a million lifetimes, no human being is capable of fundamentally altering his or her nature.  One's nature is given, determined, pre-programmed by God or whatever you want to call the Master Creator of the universe.  If God has determined that a person will have certain proclivities and attitudes, it is only God that can ever change that, not the individual.

Consider the issue of tastes.  Do you like the taste of a cheeseburger?  If so, no amount of refraining from eating cheeseburgers is ever going to purge your desire to eat one.  Even after 50 years without a cheeseburger, the pangs of craving will still accost you when the thought of a cheeseburger comes to mind.  Someone else, on the other hand, might hate cheeseburgers and no amount of eating them will ever change that -- he will simply always dislike the taste, as a God-given feature of his being.

Similarly, one cannot voluntarily overcome any desire, attitude, or personality trait through individual effort.  One can only repress undesirable aspects of one's being or cultivate positive aspects by choice that might grow to become stronger than the others.  But only God can "un-make" a person and "re-make" the person into something else, a new creature.  Divine grace is necessary for true progress to occur, rather than simply building new subconscious defense mechanisms, schemes of the superego, and resulting conflictedness and fragmentation of being.

For this reason, the karmic view of reincarnation in which people are cursed to endure life after life of repeating the same mistakes because it's in their very nature, unless they can somehow choose to systematically defy their nature and create for themselves a new nature (which is virtually impossible), makes little sense if the universe is ruled by a God of goodness and love.  It's like a hamster running on a wheel -- he expends a lot of effort, but never gets anywhere.  I personally choose not to accept this view of reality, because I find it hopeless and depressing.  I prefer to believe in a God who is willing and able to transform each and every one of us, knowing that we can never do it through our own efforts alone.  I find this belief provides me with hope that cannot be found in some other belief systems.

Freebird
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print


This is a Peer Moderated Forum. You can report Posting Guideline violations.