Morrighan:
On reply # 1 Seagull said: "I don't know whether someone can answer that question rationally without having factual knowledge of what the afterlife offers."
In my responses I referred to NDEs, OBEs, my non-physical experiences, meditations and inner knowing.
On reply # 2 you said: "Seagullresting nails it. Which is why we go look for ourselves, rather than relying on the accounts of others."
As you are prone to do, you decided to delegitimize the validity of what people other than yourself have experienced and learned. I don't know how a person can have an intelligent conversation with a person who finds it necessary to constantly deny the validity of the spiritual experiences and findings of others. I speak of NDEs and such, and you speak of Jonestown suicides.
I can understand about not wanting to be limited by one's psychological conditioning as one tries to find out what is true, but
blindly disregarding what others have found and not being limited by psychological conditioning, are not the same thing. It is possible to consider what others say about their experiences and findings, without being fooled and limited by what they say, as long as one doesn't become overly emotionally attached to what they say, or doesn't have related pre-existing emotional attachments. Such emotional freedom will enable one to consider what somebody else says with discernment.
There might be occasions when people other than yourself have discovered and concluded in a way that is true. If we become emotionally attached to not considering what others have to say, we might lose the openness to discover the same thing.
Don't avoid becoming aware of God's existence, because you are afraid of getting caught up in someone else's psychological conditioning.
Morrighan wrote on Aug 15th, 2017 at 5:35pm:Recoverer 2 wrote on Aug 15th, 2017 at 4:27pm:Morrighan:
It seems to me that you are denying the validity of what other people have experienced, even though you didn't have their experiences. It is so convenient for you to deny the validity of what everybody else has experienced and learned. Perhaps this is a way for you avoid having to deal with some of what others have found. No need to avoid, since in the end things work out quite well.
Hi. Squinting hard to see where I wrote or implied such, or any need to "avoid". Uncertain how one may find I hold such to be "convenient." I trust what I wrote in just upthread is quite clear.