Roger:
I can understand why you and other people get upset when people consider alternative explanations for the 911 events.
Perhaps if you considered the intentions of people who do, you wouldn't consider it necessary to loathe them so much.
A cruise missle into the Pentagon? I haven't researched that theory, but it does seem questionable. I won't come to a definite conclusion without researching the matter.
Some say airplanes didn't crash into the Twin Towers, rather holograms were used. I haven't researched this subject in depth, but going by the videos I watched, the multiple angles provided, and other information, it seems as if airplanes did crash into the Twin Towers.
One thing that makes it so I am willing to question, is the way in which three towers collapsed as if controlled explosins took place. I'm not an engineer and I don't know how the towers were designed, but it seems strange to me that fires on the upper levels of the towers could cause the collapses that took place. Some engineers do not believe this possible. Plus there are other factors, such as thermite found at the site, and George W. Bush saying he saw a plane crash into a tower on TV, before such an event was aired.
I tend to be liberal minded, but not to a fanatical extent where I would do something such as believe everything somebody such as Bill Maher says.
People often think to extremes. Some people believe just about every conspiracy theory that is out there. Some people close their minds to just about anything that challenges the status quo. Perhaps there is a way that is closer to the middle.
This world has a long history of numerous people doing really negative things. This includes people that present themselves in a way that seems positive. If it is possible for there to be people in countries other than the United States who act without pure motives, then it is possible for there to be this kind of people within the United States. When I say this I even have members of the Democratic Party in mind.
Perhaps there are some people who understand that it is important to speak out about possible wrong doings. To vilify such people, will perhaps that sort of way leads to dictatorships where freedom of speech doesn't exist. It reminds me of when people would speak against President Bush during the early stages of the Iraq war. When the citizens of a country lose the freedom to speak up about possible unnecessary wars and other things, well then that country is in trouble.
If a President isn't able to handle being spoken of in a perhaps overly negative way (such as how the Republican Party speaks of Obama), then perhaps such a person shouldn't become President.
rondele wrote on Apr 18th, 2016 at 3:13pm:Doc- If I accused you of being a mass murderer (i.e. you were behind the 9/11 attacks), that is not a mere insult. It is repugnant and disgusting. So if you responded by calling me a couple of choice adjectives, that would hardly be equivalent to the crime I accused you of.
R