Quote:I have spoken to quite a few people claiming superior knowledge of such esoteric concepts like Higher Selves who display behavior that is far from spiritually advanced, on a couple occasions the people displaying even more harmful qualities than most I know who are clueless about such concepts actually.
Hi again Dude, i was speaking to the above mostly, and yes you did not outright say that you thought such individuals were less developed etc, but it did sound like you were implying/insinuating this.
A human whom is completely direct and sincere all, or even most of the time, is a rare being indeed, and with most (i've learned the hard way), you have to read between the lines to some extent to see what they are really saying, because people often imply, insinuate, or indirectly approach things as well. You can also see this often when talking to people in person, their lips might say one thing, but their body language or other non verbal communication says differently.
But, if i read too much into it, then "my bad". It sounds like you weren't trying to imply or insinuate that at all?
Either way, i believe that post contains helpful information, so even if it wasn't directly speaking to what you were saying, it wasn't a complete waste of time.
Regarding your recent post and the first paragraph (which i do very much agree with in general), then why call the process "purification of the mind"? If you call it only one thing, or think of it mostly in a certain way or even with just a certain label, then it can lock one into more rigid and belief system oriented way of thinking of things.
When i do have to label the process to communicate to others, i prefer to say "grow in/attune to Love", because it puts all the emphasis on the reality, on the solution (and in a bigger picture way, since Love is the ultimate, and the alpha and omega so to speak).
This semantic difference doesn't seem like a big deal on the surface, but as i hinted before, it can make a difference to the subconscious layer of self over time.
When i was involved with a certain "spiritual" course, that course talked A LOT about ego, separation, etc. I found myself focusing a lot on the problem, rather than the solution when i was reading it. I started to see the big ego monster everywhere, all the time. It became over much a focus. (my sense is that it was designed this way on purpose).
Granted, this is partly because of how that course was specifically designed and set up to bore the conscious mind by repetition and rhythm. But similar can happen when self thinks to self a lot over time, "I need to purify the mind." or generally says, "it's all about purification of the mind". That can eventually influence the subconscious more than one realizes.
To be honest and very direct Vincent--last time i remember you were active here, i remember you talking about going to a 10 day (?) meditation retreat, more specifically a Vipassana Buddhist meditation retreat.
My sense is that you may have been strongly influenced by this, perhaps more than you consciously realize. I also believe it's possible that while this belief system has a number of helpful and accurate things involved, that it may also have some inaccurate or limiting aspects too.
I don't know if this is true or not about this approach, but wikipedia says of this practice, "A synonym for "Vipassanā" is paccakkha (Pāli; Sanskrit: pratyakṣa), "before the eyes," which refers to direct experiential perception. Thus, the type of seeing denoted by "vipassanā" is that of direct perception, as opposed to knowledge derived from reasoning or argument."
I don't believe that perception can be cut into black and white like this. For example, reasoning is not always just about the logical, analytical so called "left brain" side of us (saying more metaphorically than literally), but "reasoning" can involve deeper things like intuition too.
Eastern belief systems in general are a bit too polarized to the Yin side of consciousness, i have noted time and time again.