Copyrighted Logo

css menu by Css3Menu.com


 

Bruce's 5th book, a Home Study Course, is now available.
Books & Tapes by Bruce Moen
    Bruce's Blog now at http://www.afterlife-knowledge.com/blog....

  HomeHelpSearchLoginRegister  
 
Pages: 1 
Send Topic Print
Afterlife Factions - The Humanists vs. the Unity (Read 11401 times)
DocM
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 2168
Afterlife Factions - The Humanists vs. the Unity
Mar 11th, 2014 at 6:39pm
 
It occurs to me, through stimulating conversations with others here, that in the afterlife realms of consciousness there are likely different factions, and that they are belief systems unto themselves.  The confusing thing about this fact is that to those of us in human bodies, some of these afterlife realms set their point of view up as a gold standard to follow for spiritual evolution.

For a while, I have seen Focus 27 as a belief system territory - admittedly for open minded humans who wih to manifest things with their minds, and explore, but who still are bound to their earthly egos and not necessarily feeling themselves as part of the whole.  It sounds like a fun place (from a human perspective).  As Bruce stated, if you liked shoes, you could have a whole ware house full of them, manifest just by thinking of it.  Or you could converse with great sages or explore the akashic databases to absorb reams of knowledge.  Yet absent from this realm is a direct contact with Source/God.  Focus 27 is more concerned with your transition to the afterlife an exploration of your wants and needs.  The folks there are said to have a live and let live attitude, and wouldn't impose their will on another.  I would call this faction the "humanists." 

However, there are other afterlife factions which seem to be concerned with the direct experience of our true nature as a spiritual being, as a unique small piece of God.  To them, physical human life is based on an illusion or false premise - that we are separate beings.  That the world is divided into polar opposites.  These souls have a reached an awareness where they recognize themselves as part of God, but unique and one part of a unity.  The driving force behind the unity is love.  This faction, I will call the Unity faction.  To the unity faction, enlightenment comes when we our aware of our true nature, accepting of it, and are able to be part of the whole universe, yet still present as our unique point of perception. 

The humanist faction of the afterlife is full of earth like activity.  Helpers, councils of elders, teachers, training areas, heavenly Rehab/Hospital like centers.  Essentially an evolution of our humanity without a body, but still minus the final big picture. 

In contrast, the Unity faction of the Afterlife consists of a soul-group, and a sharing of knowledge and experience, with the goal being to rid ourselves of ego, and to merge with each other and Source itself. 

The two factions have different perspectives and therefore different goals.  The humanist faction seeks spiritual advancement by learning on the earth plane and "getting it right."  Acting in a more loving way in any given situation.  Reincarnation and planning is key to this faction.

The Unity faction is quite different.  I don't believe a council of elders or reincarnation would play a prominent role.  As Nanci Danison noted in her NDE, those espoused to the Unity view look at earth as a playground for experience, which will ultimately be digested, shared and eventually merged with Source.  To their view, people don't have to "get it right" because there is no getting it wrong.  They believe that when we shed the body, our consciousness expands to such a level that the we can shed our earthly egos and realize who and what we really are. 

Swedenborg saw innumerable afterlife societies, and did mention different "heavens" for those who expressed love more for their fellow men than to God/Source, though he felt that one had to love both to have spiritual understanding.

Of course, when thinking about it, one can imagine limitless afterlife factions and schools which address our true nature, each one seeming to be authoritative in its own way.  In the end, perhaps we end up in the same final place.  I would imagine, we choose which faction to be a part of, much like we do on earth.  I would just suggest keeping this in mind when we hear definitive explanations of planning in the afterlife, reincarnation and the like.


M
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
recoverer
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 5027
Gender: male
Re: Afterlife Factions - The Humanists vs. the Unity
Reply #1 - Mar 12th, 2014 at 3:51pm
 
Wow Doc!

With a limited number of paragraphs you said a lot.

Without getting specific, I believe there is a lot of accuracy in what you said.

I don't want to have to reincarnate. If I do so it will be only for service oriented reasons. Of course, that's what I say while here in the World. Perhaps I'll feel differently when I return to the spirit World.

I say this while basically believing that reincarnation doesn't exist to the extent some people state. Rather, Soul Group members share their experiences with each other so repeated incarnations of any one Soul isn't required.

I don't plan to hang out in Focus 27 for long after I die. I plan to hook up with Source as soon as possible.

I'm trying to do so while incarnated in the body.  Even though I can experience love and peace while in this World, I am not able to do so to the extent that a spirit being does. I don't think my physical body could handle that energy level.

I'm thankful that I can have my daily moments when I can feel divine love and peace. Such times are the only times when I feel really good.

Perhaps if I got better at not doing things such as stressing when I have a big workload while at work, I'll do better. My main stress at work is that I'm responsible for a number of things that have to be done correctly, and if they aren't, I could get fired.

Perhaps that's just my imagination. I've been working at the place I work for more than 20 years.



Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
DocM
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 2168
Re: Afterlife Factions - The Humanists vs. the Unity
Reply #2 - Mar 12th, 2014 at 5:02pm
 
Hi Albert,

I guess I'm going through a change of belief systems myself, and that is why I'm not as upbeat as usual.  One thing on my mind is that with the great expansion of our consciousness in spirit, after the first stage of death, when we find we can manifest at will, absorb huge databases of information, etc., there may be a change in priorities, and a, um, well "dehumanization" process.  It addresses in part, Don's question about why we don't hear from our loved ones more often.  It is quite possible, even likely, that once we are soul-realized, sharing with others, that our earthly lives become more like a recent play we just watched.   We know that our true reality is more than the human animal with our soul.  We still love our loved ones, but we realize that on earth, they were part of the virtual experience, and that they will be fine in the end.  Earthly matters, in a nutshell matter less, once we are soul-realized.

I think most contact from the afterlife is from those who stay in the most human-like realms up to Focus 27.  And people who stay there usually can't or won't stay long - they are intermediary belief realms. 

After going through an intellectual spiritual awakening, I am now in a "now what?" phase.  Much of the regular life goals and activities make less sense to me right now.  I probably should go off and live in a cave somewhere.  But seriously, goals of a career, planning for kids, finances, future, most of these day to day cares have to do with the drama or play of life here in the earth life system.  Once the genie is out of the bag, about our true nature, who is going to remain fully in the game?  It is like the movie The Matrix, where the "real person" is in their own little battery pod, but hooked into a computer program which makes them think they are interacting in a normal life.  If you knew that, would you live virtually, and in ignorance?  One of the villains in the movie, as I recall went back into the Matrix as part of his deal to betray his comrades. 

The Unity experience tells us that we are pinpoints of consciousness, independent but part of God/Source, and that it we fool ourselves into thinking we are alone and separate.  The Humanist faction for the afterlife believes in growing as a human being first, both here and in the afterlife, with the goal being to express love and be closer to God/Source that way. 

I had always been a humanist, but now, I am realizing that the most direct experience that you or I can have with the divine is the experience or knowing of the Unity faction.  This is what I am trying to wrap my head around right now, and somehow integrate my current human life into the equation to act in a way that makes sense.

M

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
recoverer
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 5027
Gender: male
Re: Afterlife Factions - The Humanists vs. the Unity
Reply #3 - Mar 12th, 2014 at 5:59pm
 
Doc:

I get what you’re saying. Please excuse me if I don’t address every point you made. I say that without knowing what I’m going to say next. Here goes. Smiley

Regarding the Unity thing, I’m pretty much alone most of the time. There have been ladies that have shown an interest in me, but because of how I help with retrievals I can’t get involved with them.

For a while each night before I went to bed I would think of how I’m alone. In a way this isn’t natural because our goal state is one of Oneness, not separation.

When I would feel like this a part of my mind would think “I need a lady friend.” Then I would go to bed and meditate before falling asleep. Pretty much every time I would experience divine love and peace. The feeling of aloneness would go away.  When I feel this love and peace I take note of the fact that I don’t need anything else.

With that in mind, I look forward to the day when I can rejoin God and the beings who are with him.  Things like watching TV, even though they are enjoyable to some degree, leave me with an empty feeling.

I don’t feel aloneness like I used to, but occasionally I still do.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
carl
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 122
Re: Afterlife Factions - The Humanists vs. the Unity
Reply #4 - Mar 13th, 2014 at 2:16am
 
DocM wrote on Mar 11th, 2014 at 6:39pm:
It occurs to me, through stimulating conversations with others here, that in the afterlife realms of consciousness there are likely different factions, and that they are belief systems unto themselves.  The confusing thing about this fact is that to those of us in human bodies, some of these afterlife realms set their point of view up as a gold standard to follow for spiritual evolution.

For a while, I have seen Focus 27 as a belief system territory - admittedly for open minded humans who wih to manifest things with their minds, and explore, but who still are bound to their earthly egos and not necessarily feeling themselves as part of the whole.  It sounds like a fun place (from a human perspective).  As Bruce stated, if you liked shoes, you could have a whole ware house full of them, manifest just by thinking of it.  Or you could converse with great sages or explore the akashic databases to absorb reams of knowledge.  Yet absent from this realm is a direct contact with Source/God.  Focus 27 is more concerned with your transition to the afterlife an exploration of your wants and needs.  The folks there are said to have a live and let live attitude, and wouldn't impose their will on another.  I would call this faction the "humanists." 

However, there are other afterlife factions which seem to be concerned with the direct experience of our true nature as a spiritual being, as a unique small piece of God.  To them, physical human life is based on an illusion or false premise - that we are separate beings.  That the world is divided into polar opposites.  These souls have a reached an awareness where they recognize themselves as part of God, but unique and one part of a unity.  The driving force behind the unity is love.  This faction, I will call the Unity faction.  To the unity faction, enlightenment comes when we our aware of our true nature, accepting of it, and are able to be part of the whole universe, yet still present as our unique point of perception. 

The humanist faction of the afterlife is full of earth like activity.  Helpers, councils of elders, teachers, training areas, heavenly Rehab/Hospital like centers.  Essentially an evolution of our humanity without a body, but still minus the final big picture. 

In contrast, the Unity faction of the Afterlife consists of a soul-group, and a sharing of knowledge and experience, with the goal being to rid ourselves of ego, and to merge with each other and Source itself. 

The two factions have different perspectives and therefore different goals.  The humanist faction seeks spiritual advancement by learning on the earth plane and "getting it right."  Acting in a more loving way in any given situation.  Reincarnation and planning is key to this faction.

The Unity faction is quite different.  I don't believe a council of elders or reincarnation would play a prominent role.  As Nanci Danison noted in her NDE, those espoused to the Unity view look at earth as a playground for experience, which will ultimately be digested, shared and eventually merged with Source.  To their view, people don't have to "get it right" because there is no getting it wrong.  They believe that when we shed the body, our consciousness expands to such a level that the we can shed our earthly egos and realize who and what we really are. 

Swedenborg saw innumerable afterlife societies, and did mention different "heavens" for those who expressed love more for their fellow men than to God/Source, though he felt that one had to love both to have spiritual understanding.

Of course, when thinking about it, one can imagine limitless afterlife factions and schools which address our true nature, each one seeming to be authoritative in its own way.  In the end, perhaps we end up in the same final place.  I would imagine, we choose which faction to be a part of, much like we do on earth.  I would just suggest keeping this in mind when we hear definitive explanations of planning in the afterlife, reincarnation and the like.


M



Doc or Matthew. I know you and others here treat me like some sort of a pariah...But that is to be expected from people who put other people on a pedestal, and "worship" them like visionary seers. These are your words, quote; as Bruce stated, "if you liked shoes, you could have a whole warehouse full of them, manifest just by thinking of it.  Or you could converse with great sages or explore the akashic databases to absorb reams of knowledge." Quoting Bruce Moen.   

So how come Bruce Moen, or anybody else here that uses his "imagination system", will never publish anything about future events or wondrous words of wisdom from ancient sages, if they have access to these higher dimensional places? And if you wondering? The Akashic libraries in the afterlife dimensions contain everything from the past to the ever changing present-future! And that also includes our physical future lives if/when we wish to reincarnate again. So all of you that paid your hard earned dollars for a system of afterlife communication and exploration, let us know something in advance that is going to happen in the future via the akashic records, however small? All you have to do is to "imagine" it!?   
Carl. Blessings and Love in Christ    PS. Sorry to off topic, Matthew, but I'm sure when you pass over, you'll be met and given your white shining robes by exalted masters, then taken to the huge translucent marbled Greek temple, where you'll be given the secrets of the universe, much like most of the disillusioned crew here. Accept Christ before negative forces explodes your self-centered ego, and you end up in one of their lower realms.    
    
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Lucy
Super Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1158
C1
Re: Afterlife Factions - The Humanists vs. the Unity
Reply #5 - Mar 13th, 2014 at 3:49am
 
to Carl:

Not sure what you DO stand for or believe in, it just seems like you like to pick other things apart

but hey, it is your life
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
carl
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 122
Re: Afterlife Factions - The Humanists vs. the Unity
Reply #6 - Mar 13th, 2014 at 4:19am
 
Lucy wrote on Mar 13th, 2014 at 3:49am:
to Carl:

Not sure what you DO stand for or believe in, it just seems like you like to pick other things apart

but hey, it is your life


Wow! Lucy, so what do you you stand for? People who write books, but have absolutely no proof that what they write is true and honest? Or do we just stand around each other on this forum, drinking cups of tea or coffee, urinating in each others pockets with our false self-centered egoistic words and pretensions? Blessings and Love in Christ. Carl 
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Lucy
Super Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1158
C1
Re: Afterlife Factions - The Humanists vs. the Unity
Reply #7 - Mar 13th, 2014 at 5:45am
 

Matthew

This general topic is so relevant, yet it is difficult to know how to start a conversation on this, because there is no clear direct question, and certainly no clear answer.

I feel like no matter what "source" I look to, that there is something I don't get about why I am here, and I think that I have to be "over there" to get it. I say that because there is often a feeling that the thought processes work differently over there. This is mentioned in various sources; Anita Moorjani's mention of it was clear. Maybe we just don't get to know until we put it all together, usually at the end (ie when we get to leave the earth cycle).

But maybe experiencing the Humanist view is a necessary component of reaching the Unity view (I think you are implying the Unity is more "advanced"....or is that my prejudice?)

I appreciated what you wrote below because I hit a place like this before I developed a career and wrestling with the questions did pull me away from remaining fully in the game, though it didn't stop my ego from wanting to be in the game. At least you are in a good place financially and career-wise that you can be a little on automatic drive. I don't advocate playing the game but not having money etc to survive the culture can be a real problem.


Quote:
After going through an intellectual spiritual awakening, I am now in a "now what?" phase.  Much of the regular life goals and activities make less sense to me right now.  I probably should go off and live in a cave somewhere.  But seriously, goals of a career, planning for kids, finances, future, most of these day to day cares have to do with the drama or play of life here in the earth life system.  Once the genie is out of the bag, about our true nature, who is going to remain fully in the game?



this is such a topic! but I have to quit writing now. I hope others will comment
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
seagull
Senior Member
****
Offline


ALK Member

Posts: 269
land sea sky
Gender: female
Re: Afterlife Factions - The Humanists vs. the Unity
Reply #8 - Mar 13th, 2014 at 7:54am
 
Carl,

Is there something wrong with drinking tea...or coffee? What is your favorite kind of tea?

Although many people like to name their favorite things here on earth as reasons why they would return for another life here, it seems that in some places in the afterlife we can experience these sorts of pleasures, or others.

I hope to be reunited with loved ones who have crossed over, and to enjoy other experiences there which are just as wonderful as some moments in this life. But, I hope, also, that those who could not enjoy them here will be able to enjoy them there. So, I can see a purpose for many different kinds of places for individuals to spend eternity in, as we all have different ideas of what is wonderful, and what is wonderful to us in a certain instance can change. We can desire change.

But, I see no reason why it would be necessary to return to earth to experience these things. For instance, I have never been a mother here on earth, but I may be in another realm of being. I would prefer not to do it here, as I barely have what it takes to care for my little dog. And I love her dearly.

And, unity. Must it be one or the other?

In near death experiences people report moving toward and even into a great, wonderful, loving being which may be recognized as "God" to some, and they also report returning all the way back into their bodies when they are revived. So, I don't actually see it as being so separated into factions. I see it as us being kind of like children learning to walk and moving towards a wonderful "Great Mother" or "Great Father" who doesn't care to hold us so closely that we cannot experience a different point of view. This great being allows us to have a multitude of experiences, for better or for worse, like our earthly mothers and fathers do.

Thanks, Carl. It was nice having this cup of tea with you.

carl wrote on Mar 13th, 2014 at 4:19am:
Lucy wrote on Mar 13th, 2014 at 3:49am:
to Carl:

Not sure what you DO stand for or believe in, it just seems like you like to pick other things apart

but hey, it is your life


Wow! Lucy, so what do you you stand for? People who write books, but have absolutely no proof that what they write is true and honest? Or do we just stand around each other on this forum, drinking cups of tea or coffee, urinating in each others pockets with our false self-centered egoistic words and pretensions? Blessings and Love in Christ. Carl 

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
DocM
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 2168
Re: Afterlife Factions - The Humanists vs. the Unity
Reply #9 - Mar 13th, 2014 at 8:40am
 
Seagull,

I don't think it is all or nothing, but it sort of dawned on me that some factions of NDErs report councils of elders, Focus 27, distinctly a humanesque approach toward evolution, whereas others spoke of transcending the human mindset and being part of a greater whole, be it "Source," or whatever name is chosen for God.  There is more than one way to progress.

Carl,

I actually do think you contributed to the thread in your own way, and that you weren't just insulting.  Carl, believe it or not, I believe my thinking and heart are more in line with Jesus and the gospels than you think.  I believe in God's love, in turning the other cheek, in loving one's enemies, in blessing those who hate you.  What is more important, Carl?  To declare oneself a christian, but not act like one, or to not belong to a church but follow the heart of the gospels?  I'll leave that for you to figure out.

JC spoke of everything that is discussed in New Age thought.  Seek and ye shall find, knock and the door will open, and use your faith to move a mountain.  This is another way of discussing the power of faith, conviction and will to manifest in the real world.  JC did say that the only way to the Father is through him.  To many, that means through the heart of the teachings of the gospel, not through an anthropomorphic being to worship.  So many don't get that.  They feel that going to church and invoking scripture guarantees them a place in heaven.  How shocked they are to find that how they treat others and express love while alive is what really counts! 

You lambast Bruce, myself and others and in so doing you go against the very heart of the doctrine you want to live by!  You ask why predictions are not brought back.  They are, Carl.  I can quote from several NDErs who foresaw events that took place, with hits or misses - but why do so?  The future is a database of possibilities and probabilities.  Christian devotees have made many future predictions which did not come to pass.  None of that has relevance on what our true nature is, or whether there exist realms of thought/consciousness/soul in the afterlife.

But Carl, the idea that I dislike you is truly off base.  I dislike your negative comments about posters and explorers, because, well, I think that is not what this forum is about.  I do enjoy when you post comments that are remotely related to the topic, even if they are uniquely yours.  Because then there is something to talk about.


M
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Lights of Love
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 881
Re: Afterlife Factions - The Humanists vs. the Unity
Reply #10 - Mar 13th, 2014 at 10:45am
 
Hi Matthew,

Well, I'd probably pick apart some of the faction premises, Smiley but I get what you're saying so, I'll just say that, I see it as all of the various realities having evolved out of necessity to give support to the evolutionary process of the One Consciousness.  The realm that receives the newly deceased is a part of the transition, re-acclimation process set up to meet the needs of individuals as they progress toward shedding the earthly ego and realizing who they really are.  Perhaps like stepping stones where one can take it slow and savor the journey or skip steps when one has "been there, done that."  Still I see it all as a process of choice, even if choice can be limited within the various realities.  Like ELS, I suspect every reality evolves in its own way and in its own time.

Focus 27 and all other virtual realities (the non-physical to us) have their evolutionary purpose and intention.  Still, they all evolved within one entire system and they all work for the betterment of that system.  None of us has ever become separated from that system or each other, except for the distinction of the individuation we were initially given/acquire as we continue to evolve.  I don't know as though there really is an endpoint.  I see it more as boundless.  Merging with Source and each other to me is a metaphor for who we really are... One Consciousness Being interacting with itself in a myriad of ways.

K
Back to top
 

Tread softly through life with a tender heart and a gentle, understanding spirit.
 
IP Logged
 
recoverer
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 5027
Gender: male
Re: Afterlife Factions - The Humanists vs. the Unity
Reply #11 - Mar 13th, 2014 at 1:22pm
 
Related to what Kathy said below, I'm not one hundred percent certain, but going by some of the experiences I've had, the afterlife is set up in more than one way. It is a matter or what each Soul needs in order to evolve. Therefore, a specific description of the afterlife might not be completely accurate.

Lights of Love wrote on Mar 13th, 2014 at 10:45am:
Hi Matthew,

Well, I'd probably pick apart some of the faction premises, Smiley but I get what you're saying so, I'll just say that, I see it as all of the various realities having evolved out of necessity to give support to the evolutionary process of the One Consciousness.  The realm that receives the newly deceased is a part of the transition, re-acclimation process set up to meet the needs of individuals as they progress toward shedding the earthly ego and realizing who they really are.  Perhaps like stepping stones where one can take it slow and savor the journey or skip steps when one has "been there, done that."  Still I see it all as a process of choice, even if choice can be limited within the various realities.  Like ELS, I suspect every reality evolves in its own way and in its own time.

Focus 27 and all other virtual realities (the non-physical to us) have their evolutionary purpose and intention.  Still, they all evolved within one entire system and they all work for the betterment of that system.  None of us has ever become separated from that system or each other, except for the distinction of the individuation we were initially given/acquire as we continue to evolve.  I don't know as though there really is an endpoint.  I see it more as boundless.  Merging with Source and each other to me is a metaphor for who we really are... One Consciousness Being interacting with itself in a myriad of ways.

K

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
BobMoenroe
Ex Member


Re: Afterlife Factions - The Humanists vs. the Unity
Reply #12 - Mar 13th, 2014 at 2:01pm
 
Quote:
"Accept Christ before negative forces explodes your self-centered ego, and you end up in one of their lower realms."

Carl, it would be similar if someone said to you: accept some new age icon before so and so happens. Would you "surrender" by means of guilt and/or intimidation? This experiental pattern is a loop and goes nowhere repeatedly until the loop is broken.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Lucy
Super Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1158
C1
Re: Afterlife Factions - The Humanists vs. the Unity
Reply #13 - Mar 14th, 2014 at 3:46am
 
Quote:
but have absolutely no proof that what they write is true and honest?


Actually this is the underlying question

What will we accept as proof?

(The history of science is full of different answers to that...)

So what methods do you use to develop Christ Conciousness and how well do they work?  and what do they produce?

I feel like I learn more about that from various other sources, such as NDEs, than I do from churches. Of course, the proof is experiential rather than objective, so the only way to prove it is to experience it.

All in good time, I suppose.

but I don't mind reading various and even contradictory tour guides to this planned trip to darkest Africa, or darkest inner space.

or maybe it is even analagous to a trip to Boston. Some tourists will visit Quincy Market or the North End, or Bunker Hill, some will ride the Swan boats, or go to the top of the Pru, or go out to Concord green, and, because all those experiences are different, it may not sound to the people back home that they are visiting the same city, or area, but they are. But how do you prove that?  You go for yourself and ride the T or drive to all those places. But at the same time, you believe the stories you hear until they are proven incorrect.

But it is even more complex than that. So if several different people go to the same place, say Bunker Hill monument, they will take with them their own ideas about what is important in life or on tours, and they will come back with different information. One will count the steps to climb the monument, or enjoy the view after the climb. Someone else wilL remember the ranger's (the guide) stories about how Sam Adams was a rebel rabble rouser (even without the beer) or how the battle went or why it was fouhgt, another will recal the stories about hwo Boston city employees got a holiday out of the whole thing (Bunker Hill Day). And depending on what is important to the person back home (their belief system) when they go they will look for other things too. Are we going to argue about who really went to the Bunker Hill Monument?

Maybe what is missing is a deeper understanding of the idea that your beliefs form your reality. How literally can we take that statement? Maybe in "heaven" it is more literal than it is in physical reality, since here we seem to be bound by some basic rules and assumptions that I don't think would exists on the other side. In that case, what is true and honest?



Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
DocM
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 2168
Re: Afterlife Factions - The Humanists vs. the Unity
Reply #14 - Mar 14th, 2014 at 6:33am
 
Lucy,

In your post you distilled some very important points and questions.  I like your anaolgy about a trip to Boston.  It is sort of like the three blind men describing an elephant (one touching the trunk - seems like a snake, one touching the body, "seems like a cow" and the last the tail, etc..).  They each experience their own knowns based on their limited experience.  Only a synthesis of their experiences can give the bigger picture of what the elephant or city (your Boston example) is really like.

I was going to start a thread on belief systems vs. "knowns."  Tom Campbell, a former scientist who worked with Monroe and authored the book My Big TOE (theory of everything), goes into detail about this.  Belief systems are deeply ingrained in us and tied into our egos.  Our ego wants to be "right" about things, and have opposing views be "wrong" or deluded.  This gives us temporary confidence in life but is rarely satisfying.  A known is something directly experienced.  People who explore and find astral planes, heavens or hells.  People who have a NDE, relate an absolute certitude of what they experienced based only on their direct perception of it.  But from that point on, it is an unshakeable "known."

Some types of perception occur on an enhanced level, where we can take in a lot of data in terms of knowledge, feelings, associations all at once.  This type of experience is perhaps the strongest verification anyone can get.  And yes, your "knowns" may be different than mine, must be different initially, except when we get to some of the most basic knowns out there like love.  Some call this Christ consciousness, and indeed, I think much of what is in the gospels would fall into the category of teachings about pure love.  Yet to a bible thumper, you, Lucy are a deluded Hell-bound fanatic if you speak of love (the same love that JC spoke of) but don't belong to church or quote the gospel.  The same person who derides you for being New Age, may be anti-gay ('cause the bible tells them so - well not really in the NT, but ...), anti-immigrant, and have a whole list of those who he/she feels are not worthy of love.  This is eventhough JC tells his disciples to love everyone, and never, in all the gospels excludes any group of people from love or heaven. 

What I have come to understand, is that those who quote the letter of scripture from a church or temple, but do not live the heart or spirit of scripture are acting from a belief system, taught to them but not experienced as a known.  A person who comes on this website and tells New Age people to convert to their religion or be hell bound, has no direct experience of the teachings of Christ, or Christ consciousness.  They simply are taught an earthly series of rules to live by, and they interpret it in their own way, but keep their own "us vs. them" mentality that JC never advocated in the gospels, and that most great religions such as Judaism, Christianity and Buddhism never advocate. 

So there is a difference between belief systems and knowns.  And any seeker must be open enough to challenge long held taught beliefs in order to progress in love and spirituality.  Otherwise, they take a smug seemingly self-confident approach to life in their learned but never experienced belief system, until at some point in their lives, it fails them.

Thanks for your post, Lucy.  It is clear that you give this stuff a lot of thought, and are really seeking answers to the big questions.

M
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
a channel
Ex Member


Re: Afterlife Factions - The Humanists vs. the Unity
Reply #15 - Mar 14th, 2014 at 11:59am
 
      Matthew, you seem to be working on the basis that Nanci's perceptions are completely or mostly correct, or rather extrapolations from some of her experiences/memories.  Her info seems to form the primary basis of your Unity faction.  Personally i sense some gaps and some interpretive distortion in her info, though i think she is sincere and did have the experiences.

    It's interesting to look at her psychology, and some of the contrasts between her experiences and perceptions.  On one hand, she mentions that she felt kind of crappy or disappointed in self about having lived a not so positive human life to the point of her NDE, but then she goes on to talk about how it doesn't matter too much what we do or don't do (how we choose), because we are all One, completely loved, accepted. 

  Well, i do agree with the latter, but not so much the former.  It very much does matter how we use our freewill, and is it possible that some human (and limited, stuck) part of Nanci kind of shifted some of the emphasis off the important, active, Yang part of evolution and went with the more comforting, Yin aspect of it's already there and done? 

Perhaps this was partially a way of dealing with those disappointments in self?  In any case, once you bring back info to the body, it starts to get filtered, and is bound to experience some distortions unless we have become a pure channel of PUL and are fully attuned to Source. 

   What's interesting about Nanci is, from what i gather and perceive, is that she comes from a rather mature Disk, one wherein she had already graduated and moved out of the total ELS (with it's nonphysical dimensions too), and was hanging out in some rather expanded consciousness states. 

  She seems to have come back here for helper reasons, and not out of limiting attachment, addiction, karma to work out, etc.  In a more simple way of saying it, she had already reached a certain level and purity of Love and didn't have any need for the ELS for that kind of growth. 

   From what i understand, there is only a smallish percentage of people who are incarnated during these times, of which this applies too.   

    Yet, once she got back here and starting living her in human life, she kind of went off the path of her old soul origins. I think to our inner soul and core, this is more upsetting than perhaps she indicates. 

It's not that i think her perceptions are completely off, but rather that she has shifted the emphasis too much, and to me seems to be related to coping with certain knowledge about self. 

   Or, to be more brief, she tends to be overly polarized to the Yin side.  This is not uncommon for consciousnesses working through a female body.   Yin relates to Oneness, and it's the still, receptive side of consciousness (which is why women tend to be more strongly psychic and intuitive then men--speaking only as a trend).  Yang relates to individuality, and relates more to the active, growing, changing side of consciousness. 

   If she was like He/She of Bob Monroe's book, don't you think that perhaps maybe some of her emphasis and perceptions might change a bit?

   In reality, there are not two distinct factions, but it's interesting that your factions do seem to correspond with both right and left brain differential concepts, and with Yin (Feminine) and Yang (Masculine) differential concepts some.  But in reality, they are not separate, but part of a whole.

  The fact that you perceive them so distinctly perhaps indicates that you haven't yet fully re-merged/reintegrated these within self, which isn't saying anything bad because 99.9 % of us haven't more fully remerged these yet in a consistent, constant manner like a He/She.

  There is a way to overcome these perceptual limitations a bit, while in the body.  By directly attuning self to those levels of expanded guidance, and having them temporarily help raise you up (metaphoric speak) while still connected to the body, and getting info direct from them.  There likely will still be some distortion, but less than other means of perceiving information.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
DocM
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 2168
Re: Afterlife Factions - The Humanists vs. the Unity
Reply #16 - Mar 14th, 2014 at 12:46pm
 
Thanks Justin,

Interesting take on things.  No, my Unity faction wasn't really based just on Nanci; more that her experience was certainly emblematic of that of other Unity thinkers, such as Buddhists, Taoists, etc.  Bruce's concept of a disc is more in line of the Unity thought process.

And I don't really believe there are two factions on a bigger picture, but we get "authoritative" advice from some bent on the humanist side, and from others on the Unity side of the coin.  For instance, past life regression therapists often talk about helpers, planners, councils of elders, all involved in redirecting souls to reincarnate and "get it right" for spiritual evolution.  Bruce and others took trips to Focus 27 where there are human-like centers to review massive amounts of data, or to just manifest reality - again, a humanist type of mindset.

Then there is the experience of Nanci and other NDErs, who expand their consciousness immediately without going through the humanist angle.  For them, there is no necessary council of elders, or Afterlife human-like convention centers.  They merge with Source directly after dying. 

So, I don't really think there are divisions set in stone, just that when we die, we can choose how to approach our new consciousness, either as a human-like experience, or, if we are closer bonded to Soure/God, in a unity.  It may be related to our knowns/knowledge or advancement of spirit. 

But certain sources (M. Newton), give what seem like authoritative versions about what happens when you die.   And it seems clear that there are different experiences to be had. 


M
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
recoverer
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 5027
Gender: male
Re: Afterlife Factions - The Humanists vs. the Unity
Reply #17 - Mar 14th, 2014 at 1:03pm
 
It is interesting that Nanci was able to go as far as she did during her NDE despite a specific religious background. It could be that before her NDE somewhere within her Soul she had the wisdom to understand that no limiting dogmatic way will lead to truth. This inner knowing might've trumped any limiting belief system she picked up during this lifetime. By inner knowing I mean her pre-incarnation level of wisdom gained, rather than basic Soul knowledge.



Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
a channel
Ex Member


Re: Afterlife Factions - The Humanists vs. the Unity
Reply #18 - Mar 15th, 2014 at 12:09am
 
Hi Matthew,

Thank you for the further explanation. I think i understand better what you were trying to say, and see that i mis-understood some of it earlier. 

    I would suggest that maybe the difference that sometimes is experienced, is a combo of what an individual's needs are, and also related to consciousness maturity.   

    It may be that very mature consciousnesses tend to bypass a lot of the "adjustment" phases in the nonphysical.

    One thing i would stress, though this is not directly related to what you are talking about, is that reunion or remerging with Source is not something that we have to wait for until we phase into other dimensions/levels of consciousness. 

   It is very much open to us while connected to a body, and i think perhaps that achieving same while connected to a body is important, though not necessarily necessary.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Ginny
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 259
Wa
Gender: female
Re: Afterlife Factions - The Humanists vs. the Unity
Reply #19 - Mar 16th, 2014 at 4:16pm
 
Matthew,

The wonderous gift that Bob Monroe gave us I've always felt was the knowledge that each of us could get our own answers through our own direct experience...and that it was so much easier to do than previously thought. The only thing that drove me nuts was he never really explained how to do his new way of exploring consciousness in his third book, his 'going within' and refocusing his attention elsewhere, instead of the difficult and often misleading OOBE. I was carrying around my bag of various religions and beliefs but it always felt like I had puzzle pieces I couldn't really fit together. But Bruce did figure out what Monroe was doing and thank God he shared it.

Have you been able to find time, even 10 minutes a week, to do your own exploring, using Bruce's Focused Attention method? I don't mean to presume you haven't and sorry if I have, it's just that I was astonished at how much I began accessing and learning from being able to find out for myself.


Much love,

Ginny






Back to top
 

"Intelligence is knowing that which is important." Albert Einstein
 
IP Logged
 
DocM
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 2168
Re: Afterlife Factions - The Humanists vs. the Unity
Reply #20 - Mar 16th, 2014 at 5:26pm
 
Hey Ginny,

I meditate about 4-5 days a week.  No expectations with it, and mostly, I get into a focus 10 state of extreme relaxation and confidence.  That state is good for stating intent and manifestation, though Monroe went deeper and had further focus levels which he associated with being out of body.

The thing I have found on my own is that there should be no goal to leave the body with classic astral travel.  The whole astral phenomenon is really a wonderful analogy, and it is a misconception to think that we must lift out of our bodies to explore.  All exploration is internal, whether we recognize it or not.  I think that is what you were referring to by "going within," right? 

So yeah, I meditate, usually with a theta or delta binaural beat pattern from youtube, or hemisync tape from TMI, depending on my mood.  How about yourself?

Matthew
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bardo
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 291
Gender: male
Re: Afterlife Factions - The Humanists vs. the Unity
Reply #21 - Mar 17th, 2014 at 6:44pm
 
Doc,
I think I resonate with Lights of Love on this, and her interpretation (I think) that the humanist "faction" is more an evolutionary path to the unity of the disk. Its almost like the mechanics of the soul maturing. But its also a place of choice, where one can stay if one so desires, even when our soul has developed beyond the needs of the physical/non-physical helpers. Our earthly yearning to grow closer to  spirit seems to be the prime mover earlier in our spiritual journey. Later, the power of PUL as it is realized, ignites our soul and accelerates the process. I think Focus 27 and its environs are the engine room of the mechanics of our soul.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Ginny
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 259
Wa
Gender: female
Re: Afterlife Factions - The Humanists vs. the Unity
Reply #22 - Mar 17th, 2014 at 6:46pm
 
Matthew,

Yea, that's what I believe regarding the OOBE. Some may see it differently but I don't think it's necessary for exploring alternate realities. As a matter of fact I think a lot of fear has been generated about afterlife exploration because of fear-based manifestations created by OOB practitioners.

Before attending one of Bruce's workshop but after reading his first book I started experimenting, using the preparatory process from the TMI tapes/CDs your're talking about. Once I was relaxed, distractions were left behind and I was protected from being influences by others (it was important I believed that)...I ended up floating in a luxurious blackness, several times, waiting for someone to come--to do what, I wasn't sure (lol). I had no idea how to use nonphysical senses so I thought I was alone, doing something wrong. All that black was bewildering. I remembered Bruce talking about creating his own place in F27, so on my next jaunt I placed the intent to be there (got more blackness but I trusted the workings of my intent), imagined a city park I loved as a kid and walked into it. It not only became a safe place to become acquainted with being in the nonphysical, but it served as a launch pad as well for turning unknowns into knowns and having more fun than I could have imagined.

Bruce's Focused Attention method (Monroe's Phasing) is basically what I've been using with good results. Understanding how to use my imagination and intent was a game-changer.


Gin

Back to top
 

"Intelligence is knowing that which is important." Albert Einstein
 
IP Logged
 
a channel
Ex Member


Re: Afterlife Factions - The Humanists vs. the Unity
Reply #23 - Mar 17th, 2014 at 11:10pm
 
  Yes, Bruce's methods overall are excellent.  Mucho gracias to this Disk who projected Bruce and Bob, two helpers in the flesh who have given us a number of great tips and pointers. 

  Regarding classic OOBE's.  Rosalind McKnight's main guide labeled "Ah So" by Bob Monroe, had some very enlightening things to say about various means of exploration and of classic OOBE's.  Outlined in her book "Cosmic Journeys" which one can read for free on scribd

    Interestingly, he seemed to say that classic OOBE's was a limited way to explore, and tied in to slower vibratory levels within self as a trend. 

   This point was driven home to me with my own experiences.  My only classic OOB experiences happened during a period in my life wherein i was much more slower vibratory than usual.  In human terms, during this period, i was more selfish, overly grounded (such as wrapped up in/over attached to sexual energy), and egotistical than usual (i know, i know, HOW is that possible?   Wink

   This is not to discourage people from classic OOBE's, but rather pointing out that often, they are kind of like training wheels to explore and really believe in the reality of the nonphysical.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
DocM
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 2168
Re: Afterlife Factions - The Humanists vs. the Unity
Reply #24 - Mar 17th, 2014 at 11:43pm
 
Good points, Justin and Ginny,

I think of it this way; our true nature is consciousness unbound.  To think that we must pull ourselves out of a physical body into an astral one is to perpetuate the myth of a body at all.  Our consciousness is only bound by and to a physical body because we have chosen to be so bound.  But what do we learn on earth?  That bodies age, and wither away.  All "things" must pass in the ELS, but not our soul/spirit, which is consciousness unbound.  Why free yourself from a physical body to travel in the illusory earth plane in a new illusory astral body?  It is only a tool, a stand-in if you will for our true consciousness or spirit. 

So yeah, I think astral fans may be missing the point, but perhaps we get to the same place eventually?

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
a channel
Ex Member


Re: Afterlife Factions - The Humanists vs. the Unity
Reply #25 - Mar 18th, 2014 at 12:18am
 
    It goes even beyond that Matthew.  Expanded guidance has confirmed to me the truth that a few sources like McKnight's guidance, Cayce's guidance, and some others talk about (Monroe's He/She is an example), that our Spirit can so infuse and imbue our Soul and the human body with Light and PUL Consciousness, that one experiences truly what it's like to be "in the world, but no longer of it." 

   Meaning, one can appear to have a physical body, with all it's seeming attributes of interaction with others in this dimension, but not bound by any of the seeming rules of same.

  It's interesting that the Bible talks about how in the further past, a number of individuals lived a very, very long time in physical.  In light of what i've received and what some of those outer sources i respect and trust more than not talk about, i take this literally now. 

  In other words, one can so align and merge the seeming "outer", with the seeming "inner" that the illusion of difference and separation between the two, falls away.  Because in reality, there is no physical and nonphysical, there just is Consciousness vibrating at various different frequencies for lack of a better description.  Once self raises all aspects of self back to the original frequency, the Source frequency (fastest vibratory/most expanded), then all these limitations or seeming separations fall away for self, but self can still interact with those yet stuck in same.

   I think this is a major goal for many Disks in the "retrieval" of the physical.  I think this is why that Monroe was shown that in the further future, most humans alive will be essentially He/She types with no former limits.

  Once enough have reached this, then onto to become what Source created us to be, full and fully conscious Co-Creators and companions with same.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Mar 18th, 2014 at 1:36am by N/A »  
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 
Send Topic Print


This is a Peer Moderated Forum. You can report Posting Guideline violations.