Hi Kathy,
I think she does a good job overall.
Kathy wrote, "...when she uses the label "Source" she means the whole ONE consciousness system or what some would call God or what I call God Consciousness..."
I recently watched a number of interviews with her (some 5 or so), and in at least one, she very clearly indicated that this larger reality/Universe, was created by an individualized being and she referred to it as "Source", and that she was aware that there was other Creative sources besides this larger individualized Being. Course, she does speak about Oneness plenty--no debate there. It might be hard to find this again, but i will give it a try.
But if you look wider, and at other sources that talk about a similar concept as the above, such as Bruce with the Planning Intelligence the Child of it's Parent Consciousness, Cayces' guidance talk of the Light/Christ Spirit--the maker of this Universe, Nancy Penn Monroe's channeling of Yeshua, or John of the NT, they all say the basically same thing, that we move and exist and have our being within the Light and essence of this rather large Co-Creator Being. This manifested reality (physical and nonphysical), is a reflection of It's essence and beingness.
Or in Campbellian terms, He's the one who designed the larger video game system with it's various levels. He's the one constantly projecting and streaming the data..
If we find ourselves within same, we exist in a Oneness with It and with others within same. Course, there is also a larger Oneness than even that, but there are definite "boundaries" between this larger reality and the realities that other Co-Creator Beings have made for their Creations and parts of self.
Within this Universe/Reality, many of us are "children" of this Co-Creator Being. Some of us within this reality are children of The Source, or original Consciousness, but i suspect those are mostly the "lost sparks" that Bruce talked about.
Many of us who have a Retriever origins, like you, Albert, Bruce, me and a number of other Disks who have selves involved with this site, though, are direct offspring of the Co-Creator being--almost like his is the original Disk we came from, and our Disks are almost like probes spun off from his Disk.
And yes, that Disk has both Yin and Yang in it and is quite balanced and merged between these, but it is ever so slightly balanced to the Yang, which is why we could refer to it as a "He". Or perhaps as He/She with a very slight emphasis on the He (hence before the She).
In Consciousness, "gender" translates best as simple active and passive, much like electrical charge. Active is the moving electricity, the life force itself, and negative is the receptive and grounding counter balance or side of consciousness. Or in other more human terms, active thought-will and receptive feeling/perceiving.
You need both in any creation and in any individualized, freewilled being, and while in the more expanded levels of Consciousness these are so blended and merged to almost not be noticeable as any distinction, there is to the deeper seeing eye, slight emphasis on one over the other at times.
This perhaps why this Disk, while projecting aspects of Itself in our little Earth with it's strong polarization, has more often than not, chosen to incarnate in male bodies (though it is essentially very balanced and does have female lifetimes as well), and it's probe that BEST represents this Disk and whom is most known throughout many different realities, is none other than Yeshua (Jesus) who incarnated into a male body. Why, because it's inner nature is very slightly more polarized or balanced to the active or "male" more often than not, than the passive-receptive "female".
I don't know exactly who the being is that Tom Campbell labels the "Big Cheese", but he also clearly states that this being represents itself as and feels a bit more male than female on a consciousness level, which is why Tom refers to it as a "him".. I'm guessing that a consciousness within the "Big Cheese" role, has to be a pretty expanded and evolved consciousness (hence it will have quite the balance too).
Perhaps it's a similar thing?
We touch on some mighty big and deep concepts in the above, and it's easy to misconstrue and misunderstand, especially if one as any human gender hangups or over attachments.
For what it's worth, i perceive The Source, the very original Consciousness before any other individualized consciousnesses came into existence, is slightly more Yin or "Female" than male. My few brief experiences with this Consciousness and state of being, well it's hard to describe except as very, very still and receptive. Almost void, complete Oneness. We all still have that "memory" and state within us to tap into. But it wasn't until The Source moved and became active in creating (consciously integrated it's "male" side), that it became fulfilled. The result of this, was the Planning Intelligence for those who prefer a more religion neutral label, whom was brimming with creative force, and a bit more the Yang to Source's bit more Yin (though again, both have both within same, just as we all do, and much more balanced/integrated than most of us).
So, in the grand scheme of things, there is quite the balance.
It is very hard to put these concepts and knowings into human terms and labels. And me not being a completely clear and PUL attuned channel, no doubt it's not 100% accurate as to the perceiving, let alone the translating.
Home
Pages: 
