a channel
Ex Member
|
Interesting pics Juditha. I don't know much about photography relating to nonphysical type phenomena. I have some conflicting thoughts about it though. On one hand, that what we call "nonphysical" is essentially that, not-physical and so why would a physical machine be able to perceive/translate such information into physical awareness and meaning?
Yet, i'm also aware that some "non physical" is in a sense, close to our physical, like next door neighbors and so mabye they can deliberately insert/affect and otherwise alter "physical" in some way.
The question is, is it really the camera, the voice recorder, etc, etc that is really doing it, OR more so the person(s) (including physically focused and those less physically focused), and their affects on this flow of information we call the physical?
Meaning, a physical instrument, all by itself, probably wouldn't perceive anything "nonphysical", unless there is some kind of interactive intention there on part of "individuals" connected in some way to same.
A camera is, after all, a device designed to "capture" and translate physical images for us. That's it's intention and reason for creation. Can that be altered, probably, and again, intention and focus is key.
Btw, just curious is the name Dora strongly connected to you and/or your sister in some way?
|