Quote:


Hi Bob,

I think you may be misinterpreting what Albert and I stated.  Multi-tasking is completely different than creating parallel selves that follow the paths of other choices in a sea of consciousness.  Consciousness is much more organized than that.  We are a single individualized consciousness, not a conglomerate of self created selves spawning out everywhere.

Multi-tasking on the other hand is quite natural for all of us and I've heard it described as parallel processing or being aware of many things simultaneously.

Kathy

Quote:

Hehe, good one. The point I was trying to make: it is her direct experiences, and however she interprets them, us, the reading bystanders are also not holders of Objective Certificates, as far as I know.

Managing one extension compared to many extensions gets into multi-tasking territory. If experience is the bottom line, my spawned subjective making sense of this says the extensions could very well be bases for further branching variations, to maximize potentials.

Quote:

Note from the producer: not bad. Let's do one more take, with more emphasis on tone, harmony, melody, rhythm, composition, lyrics, musicianship, tempo and originality.

Performing perfection, and yet noticing that the sound is clinical and dull, and simultaneously (oh yes) remembering the golden tone of the classic records. Harmonics from valves, tubes and different tape formulas and speed. Ahh, perfection with a warm sound. Does a band have to have a lead singer? Four on the floor has lost it's mystery, how about 5/8? Use a recording of your friend playing the drums, chop it into smaller pieces and make a new groove. Add your own sounds into the groove. Ok, so before getting lost in the tango, where I'm going with this: there are possibilities and choices aplenty, even within the rules making up the framework for life as we know it.

Mogenblue:

That's a curious way for you to suggest that I can.

Since you brought it up  , here's a link to my site that includes information on my book "A Night in Heaven." There is a chapter that speaks about the parallel universe issue. There isn't a specific chapter that speaks about pre-arrangement. I do discuss it a little in more than one place. I don't know about writing an entire book about parallel universes and pre-arrangement.

http://nondualityisdualistic.com/

Mogenblue wrote on Oct 1^st, 2012 at 7:57pm:

  I wouldn't make her my "spiritual Teacher", but her somewhat materialistic lifestyle and approach doesn't necessarily automatically invalidate her near death experience.

  Seemingly miraculous healings can and do occur, but I do have to agree with Harvey some that she looks surprisingly good in her photo with G.W.B. for someone who got blown up enough to temporarily die. 

  However, that doesn't automatically mean she's making it all up.  Certainly is possible and i wouldn't rule that out either, but i'm also open minded to the other possibility as well--that some unusual healing was involved. 

Hi Harvey,

I recently watched both her youtube videos, and i have to be honest, something about her seemed really familiar, but i couldn't at first place my finger on it. Then i realized that her and her "vibe" reminded me a lot of an ex girlfriend.  It was kind of one of those intuitive-feeling a ha moments.

  Not too flattering in some ways, since i eventually found out that my ex was quite literally a pathological liar.  Very charming and quite likeable at times, yes, quite good and coherent at weaving tall tales, even more so. (even very similar, wide grinned very charming smile).   

  In some ways, she (the ex) has a good heart.  But, in some ways her woundedness and endless chasm of need for attention could make her do some pretty cruel things at times. 

  A quick example, when my Mom had cancer and was quite sick (when i was 18 or 19), my ex when we were still together let me know in a very dramatic way that she too had cancer and had to break up with me because she didn't want me to see her go through that and have me feel the need to be there for her (all was a big lie or rather story, though one she may have temporarily believed it herself). 

  Some mutual (and mostly female) friends who had known her longer than i had, eventually clued me into some of her attention games and woundedness after we broke up. 

  So, since this intuitive feeling and comparison did come up spontaneously, i am leaning to what you have said in a rather blunt and direct way, she may be more out for the attention and money than anything.  She also may be like my ex in that she is so habituated to lying, manipulating, and looking for attention that she doesn't herself half the time know the truth from fiction anymore, which oddly enough can lend an air of sincerity to people that far gone down the rabbit hole (such people in my experience are relatively rare, and my ex was the only person that i really liked, was attracted to and felt "close to" that was so far gone).

  Strange world we live in, and even the more intuitive and/or discriminating of us can get fooled temporarily.  You live, you learn.  The really high prices of some of her rather mundane work, her comments about desires for Porsche's or the distorted beliefs of religion re: wealth, etc. seem to speak for itself.  I will say that i still don't have any 100 percent firm conclusions about her. 

Lucy wrote on Oct 10^th, 2012 at 4:32am:


  From said article (the notes section):

"... as well as revealing some information about what many refer to as the “2012 Shift.”
They explained that The Shift is not a 2012 event; it has been underway for some time now and continues as a gradual creation. It doesn’t belong to earth physicality; it’s a dimensional shift that could be said to originate anywhere and everywhere at once since all is one."

  Since all is One, what happens within Consciousness, collective consciousness, will affect other levels aka the physical. 

  Many of Bob Monroe's explorers saw certain physical Earth changes occurring, and before them Edgar Cayce's guidance outlined some gradual trends and patterns related to global warming due to an internal shift in the Earth, etc.  Some of Bob's explorers were off on the timing and severity of it, but nonetheless the basic point is still true, if you change the inner noticeably, often the outer changes noticeably as well. 

   She is right that this shift is, or rather has been gradual and is not about just one specific 2012 date. 

   The Earth, on all levels is very much caught up in this "shift", for she is both an entity unto herself, yet also part of a Whole.   She is going through her own growing pangs and we are going through growing pangs, and both will intensify despite what so many "believe what you want to believe" new age type sources say because it's what they and we want to hear. 

   It feels like there is a possibility that things will be less severe than previously forecasted and was probable, but it still will be materially, emotionally, and spiritually challenging for many.  Many will still transition.  Electricity will still be shut off, mass starvation, etc.  It is right now, very probable that Israel and/or the U.S. will attack Iran in 2013.  If that happens, then will the Sun become extremely intense and will flare strong enough to knock out electrical grid systems around the world.  If you see red skies no matter where you live, you will know that this has started. 

  That Natalie has taken the usual New age approach to the changes (some pleasant, only dimensional shift wherein magical positive changes take place without material challenge and collective work/striving/growing on our parts), makes me more skeptical of her and her info. 

   We live in a world wherein it's mostly the false, full of half truths, and/or limiting sources that are most listened to by the majority.  We live in a world full of deception, greed, and believe what you want to believe is the rule.  Why, because Like attracts, begets, resonates with and likes Like.  The majority immature put the immature on pedestals.  Our political system and leaders are such a great reflection of that law and process in action.

  That world or more accurately-- society pattern-- is coming to an end, and for the new to make way, the old has to be torn down completely. 

Yes, I can see that you can see, isee, and though we see differently, maybe even agree to disagree, at the end of the day, it's good to see your thoughts.

The rotten lung example works the other way around too with people acting as you see as irresponsible, making grandiose statements about the future, threatening and fearmongering - waving 'this is better' in front of them.

'People hear: go stock up on food and ammunition' or 'get depressed' isee as guiltmongering, though it could be true too. It's soft but means to get people back on the subjective straight and narrow. Hearty control. Used to work on me, but now isee, which for the soul is some kinda green tea from the knowledge tree.

If everything ultimately leads to love, what's the problem? They're on individual paths too?

Lights of Love wrote on Sep 30^th, 2012 at 11:56am:


I will point out that what you have written is your belief system....what I wrote was my interpretation of information supplied by Frank DeMarco, as delivered by his Guys Upstairs. I find the concept interesting, as I do most concepts. Have you read any of Frank DeMarco's recent books?

MA