DocM
|
Ok, Mogen,
I see you need clarification on my statement. You read Rulof, and have adopted his dogma as your reality. It makes sense to you. I don't begrudge you your choice. Yet his notion that people who are cremated suffer unspeakable fire due to a persistent connection to their corpse, or that people who commit suicide must stay by their rotting corpses and not move on because they had a "fixed time" to be alive which they denied, does not ring true to me or to many who have explored the afterlife and spoken with the deceased.
You see Mogen, we are not our physical bodies. Rulof's system denies this basic reality. When the sould is freed of the physical body, it is like shedding and losing clothes. The idea that the physical construct (the body on the earth plane), could tie down a soul somehow is patently absurd.
Now if you have a belief system that you believe in with true conviction, then as per the strength in this belief in the afterlife, it will come to pass. So that if one believes one must stay with one's corpse, perhaps that soul will get "stuck" and do so. Perhaps thousands or millions have. But why would you perpetuate such a belief system?
Why not explore on your own, and take the good aspects of Rulof's work that ring true to you, and discard the bad? If you don't explore on your own, then you are not relaying first-hand knowledge - just telling us all that Rulof's first-hand knowledge is "the truth." That sort of second-hand knowledge is a cop out.
M
|