PauliEffectt wrote on Jun 22nd, 2012 at 6:01am:What puzzles me at this forum is that some people write forum posts as if they
have read absolutely nothing of Monroe's and Moen's experiences.
Instead there's some kind of religious belief, by Buhlman call unsubstantiated,
which doesn't seem to fit anywhere along the discoveries of Moen. Are those
books' experiences completely ignored? Is Moen talking to deaf ears? I just
don't get it.
Why?
I admit I have read absolutely nothing of Moen's books. His talks haven't reached my ears at all. Of Monroe I may have read one book far in the past.
I disagree that my belief should be
unsubstantiated. I base my knowledge on the books of Jozef Rulof. During his life he made many paintings in trance. I accept that. I accept that he had no qualities at all to paint himself.
Furthermore I have my own spiritual guides that made it easier for me to accept the after life.
Somewhere in the past I had a problem. I wanted to know more about the afterlife but I could not have OBE´s myself. So how to find out about the afterlife in a reliable way?
Since it was obvious to me that afterlife is there who would be best qualified to talk about that? To me it would be the people that live there. It's the same as with cooking. If you want to learn to cook you ask a cook. Simple enough.
The harder part was to find a reliable source. After many years and not before I was in the midst of a personal crisis I allowed myself to open up to the books of Jozef Rulof.
As I wrote before, the language in those books is straight forward and simple and it testifies of a deep understanding of the after life, the people on Earth and our position in the universe.
Monroe or Moen will never be able to give so much knowledge about the afterlife.
That's my explanation.
Home
Pages: 
