crossbow
Full Member
 
Offline

ALK Member
Posts: 207
Gender:
|
he he, yes Justin I think you're a bit of nutcase too. But I like you anyway. I think nearly all us humans are nutcases in our own way, at least a little bit. Like you point out, it is healthy for us to recognise in what areas we can be a little nutty, at least then we can laugh at our selves.
I know you are capable of sticking up for yourself against a rough challenge, for I have seen you do so, and you have done so against me. And I admire that. I admire men, and women, who are prepared to stand up for themselves, and who do not turn to an authority and expect the authority to take over all their potentially unpleasant interpersonal dealings and protect them from anything that is a little uncomfortable, for that is contrary to what life is about.
I assume it was Admin's work to delete KarmaLars' question/comment to you, for the entire post is removed, not just its content deleted.
I have noticed it is not unusual for challenging, crude or harsh posts to get deleted, and I notice some forum members don't mind drawing Admin's/Bruce Moen's attention to posts they think should be deleted. Naturally, I don't admire that, although I understand it.
That reminds me, here is something I can be a little nutty about:
I have observed that on biker forums, hunter's forums, boxer's forums any forums where the members don't portray themselves as society's good/caring/spiritual people and even on forums frequented by so-called racist types, sexist types, and criminal types, that the range of human discussion is capable of being far wider and freer than on forums where the "good people" meet.
On those non-spiritual/non-good people forums one may talk about anything across the full wide spectrum of human thought, from the finest to the crudest, from the politest to the rudest, and from the highest ideas of what is good and right and spiritual, to the crudest talk and of the meanest kind. On such forums one can freely challenge others, and in any fashion and by any means that words enable. One can speak any opinion from high to low, from left to right; can express any ideal, any push, any effort, in any direction. On such forums, posts do not get deleted, ideas and opinions are not banned or filtered out, but rather are thrashed out, and by reason, logic and fairness and by contrast and comparison, truth becomes visible and ultimately stands forth victorious. I like those forums, because I value truth above all else, and freedom of expression next to that, for freedom is the formula that leads to truth revealed.
But I notice that on the "spiritual", "caring", "good people's" forums, where those who like to think they are on the spiritual path come to meet and talk, that there is nearly always some degree of censorship of human input, either from the Administrator's own initiative, or by the Administrator's initiative at the membership's prompting.
As such, on such forums the range of human expression and discussion is restricted. Conversations are censored to fit into posting guidelines, and to be "on topic", "pleasant" and so-called "safe", and to fit other seemingly nice and cosey standards.
To someone like myself, the restrictions on speech that plague the "good people's" forums makes them look like hypocrites. For I see quite clearly that truth emerges visible and recognisable not out of censorship but out of the smoke of the conflict that arises when the full spectrum of truth and falseness is enabled to mix together; and I recognise that freewill in its infinite width of expression is the agent of that conflict; and that love is for freewill, like a beacon light, and only freewill can come to know love and truth. So I don't think highly of those who think themselves the good people but who like to censor the speech of others.
I notice it is the same in physical life gatherings, that amongst the so-called community conscious types, the "socially aware" people, and the "spiritual" and the "caring" types, that ideas, opinions, even words are restricted to fit a narrow ideology, and non-compliance is not tolerated.
And yet in gatherings of those who do not claim to hold the moral high ground, there one can freely speak up and down, left and right, and to and fro in any direction, and in any words and terms.
Over the years through my work and other activities, I have mixed with miners, manual labourers, criminals, prisoners, so-called racists, sexists, white supremacists, shooters, hunters, the non-pc, the so-called rednecks and bogan types, and found that I and others can speak about anything, can put forward any opinion, and it might be vigorously disagreed with but I have never been banned from saying anything by such people.
And I have also mixed with psychologists, sociologists, academics, new-age spiritual caring types, meditators, community educators / workers / social workers, and found that all but a narrow portion of the full range of human ideas, opinions and speech is banned by such people, even many words are banned. Working in such fields, I have seen colleagues sacked or otherwise forced out of their jobs just because they have been found out to disagree with the compulsory narrow ideology or because they used a word they were not suppose to use. Being seen to comply with the narrow compulsory ideology is a survival requirement when working in such fields. And these are the fields where the supposed good people work, who say they care for others. Such people wear innocent caring expressions, but their expressions are false; they are not what they seem to be. These people use frequent buzzwords like diversity, tolerance, equality, to hide that their hearts are really the opposite of what they pretend to be.
The true opposition to good is not apparent evil, but apparent good. Anyone who aspires to true goodness should contemplate this.
|