Hi,

Here is an accumulation of PUL (and some other) info kindly given to me by my Higher Self aspect. Hoping you may find some of it useful 

Attaining permanent frequency harmonisation with "All That Is"
> You let PUL flow through your life experience
> You become an active PUL transmitter and reciever
> When you love life, life loves you

Concerning PUL
> You are both a transmitter and reciever of PUL
> "All Things" are transmitters and recievers of PUL
> Life is the flow of PUL energy from transmitters to recievers
> The more you transmit PUL, the more you recieve
>The more PUL you recieve, the higher your vibrational essence becomes
> The higher your vibrational essence becomes, the more efficient you are at transmitting PUL

The Great Illusion
> The illusion is that there is an external when in fact EVERYTHING is internal
> To believe in an external is to isolate oneself from oneself and everyone and everything else.

You are a Creator
> You manifest your own reality through co-creation (facilitated by your Higher Self aspect)
> Your vibrational essence determines the nature and events of your manifestation
>You attract events and situations into your life experience that match (or harmonize with) your vibrational essence
> Your vibrational essence is shaped (or determined) by your beliefs and actions

Kindest regards,
Tebaron

L ife's
O nly
V ictorious
E nergy

L ove's
I nfinite
F lowing
E nergy

Tebaron wrote on Dec 21^st, 2011 at 8:20am:



A lovely post Tebaron.

Many helpful truths, many helpful descriptions of PUL - for those who know what PUL stands for, but of little help or meaning to any passing reader - unless they search the website for a meaning to the acronym, or enrol and post a question to ask what it means. I doubt many would do that.



If I have one minor disappointment of this forum, it is the use of the acronym PUL.

When we talk about love, there is no need to call it PUL. We can call it love so everyone can understand what is being talked about.

I accept the acronym stands for Pure Unconditional Love, which is a description of what love is, and is a true and beautiful description.

We can and should endeavour to describe love by any means to help ourselves and others comprehend and understand it. Tebaron has given us fine examples of descriptions above.

But we should discern between the name of the subject and descriptions of the subject. And when we refer to the subject, we should name it, not refer to it by a codified description.

But there is no need here to make an acronym of a description and use it instead of the word. Doing so only obscures to others what is being talked about. 

Let's not put such helpful truths as those above in code, by codifying the key word that refers to the subject matter. Lets not speak or write of love in any codified form.

Let's write in plain English and call love what it is, and share such helpful truths with the English reading world.

Love is boundaryless. Referring to love by coded word is keeping the concept of love and its teachings confined to just a few, and this is unsuitable to love's boundaryless nature. The love we mean to speak of does not confine itself. We know that.

Every reader of English knows the word love, which makes the word suitable for love's boundaryless nature. So lets use the word love when we speak of love; a boundaryless word that suits boundaryless love. Then love can travel on its word. 

   

Hi,

Very fine thread here. Thank you, Tebaron.
And Lucy.

God's love can be conditional, according to the ministers in the churches some of us grew up in. Parental love can be missing, distorted by their own traumas. Other relatives can be distant. Relationships with the opposite sex bring new conditions. The word love in all those situations was neither pure nor unconditional.
The term PUL releases all those former associations and can free love's flow.

Semantically I agree with you, Crossbow. Love is a wonderful word. Said calmly it has the vibration and tone of its subject so that just saying it is a great aid -- it releases physical bonds in preparation for healing or non-physical explorations. Saying it calmly opens us to It.

I suspect that Tebaron's post is not a dictum. These are discoveries through his Higher Self, alive vital experience, not semantics.

Bets

Sexmance? Good one. 

I realise the regulars on this forum know what PUL means, but there are hundreds of millions of people who don't know what PUL means, but they know what love means.

I am thinking of those internet searchers who may search the subject of "love" and not find helpful posts such as Tebaron's above because the word love is not used. And those people who may stumble upon such posts that discuss PUL and not realise the posts are discussing love because the word is codified with an in-house term. Such people may not gain the understanding and help they are searching for and need. 

   

Yes, let's bear in mind that search traffic passes through this site (people searching, reading perhaps only one or two posts) and therefore we might word our posts so that passing readers may understand them and gain the most benefit - especially our posts that deal with life's essential matters, such as love.