Copyrighted Logo

css menu by Css3Menu.com


 

Bruce's 5th book, a Home Study Course, is now available.
Books & Tapes by Bruce Moen
    Bruce's Blog now at http://www.afterlife-knowledge.com/blog....

  HomeHelpSearchLoginRegister  
 
Pages: 1 
Send Topic Print
Communicating with people vs. spirits (Read 9292 times)
recoverer
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 5027
Gender: male
Communicating with people vs. spirits
Dec 17th, 2011 at 5:35pm
 
Recently the issue of communicating with spirits has come up on this forum. I have found that we are able to communicate with spirits in a manner that is more reality based than when we communicate with people.

When we communicate with people we usually go by what we see and hear. We go by nervous system input.

Communicating with spirits is different. Because we tend to focus on the perception of a physical body when we communicate with people, we don't fully experience a person's underlying reality. Spirits on the other hand don't have anything to share with us other than their true underlying reality. Therefore, when we communicate with them we are more inclined to experience what their nature is actually about.

When I communicate with a friendly spirit being I don't usally see a visual image of this being. Rather, I feel this being as it actually exists. I feel love, deep peace and expansiveness. When such a being shares information I receive a part of this being's knowledge.

If I go by what my human-based mind looks for when it tries to verify whether I'm communicating with another being, I don't get much from a spirit being.

If I forget about such an inapplicable approach and connect with a spirit being in the way that spirit beings do so, then I receive a means of verification that is much more significant than seeing an image of a person's body that not only doesn't accurately represent what that person's body is, it also doesn't represent what that person's spirit is. The same is true when my ears receive the sound waves that are created when that person speaks. The same is true for the sense of touch I feel when that person's body touches my body.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Just Me
Full Member
***
Offline


ALK Member

Posts: 151
Gender: female
Re: Communicating with people vs. spirits
Reply #1 - Jan 25th, 2012 at 5:56pm
 
Hi Recoverer,

This is really interesting. I am an empath (although, I did not know what the word for what I was experiencing was until a few years ago) and I don't *see* people in their "Earth suits." I tend to pick up on people's auras, underlying self and other things not usually picked up by the five senses. I tend to get myself in trouble because I get the "willies" about people that have an almost perfect public persona and people around me think I'm just weird or I feel okay about people that other people tend to overlook. I almost never notice people's race, color or anything else most people use to identify people by their "outwardly" appearance. It's kind of spooky but I've never been wrong about my impressions even if it's taken years for me to be proven correct.

A former co-worker told me that she thought I was a nice person but she was afraid of getting to know me because I seemed like I "could see right through people." Of course, at the time I had no clue what she was talking about. After all, I've been this way my whole life. I have just come to understand that it's not as clear to some people around me.

Thanks for sharing such an interesting topic,
mj
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Vicky
YaBB Administrator
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 2170
Colorado
Gender: female
Re: Communicating with people vs. spirits
Reply #2 - Jan 26th, 2012 at 2:35am
 
Yes an interesting topic.  I think what you're talking about is the same as Bruce saying "heart intelligence".  We get a more clear channel when shifting awareness to the "heart" or energy center. 

For quite a while now I've been learning how to what I call "scan" people.  I can do it with places, objects, anything.  But the same concept is used as you describe, tuning into a person thru feeling/sensing and because the physical sense is removed, this communication is direct and pure.  What I've found is that what I see/notice in the person thru physical senses greatly differs from what I picked up nonphysically, and the nonphysical senses are always hits, always verified, so I know it's real.  I know I can trust it. 

MJ, you sound similar to me.  I too notice people's energy long before I notice their outward appearance.
Back to top
 

Author of Persephone's Journey (Amazon.com)

http://www.vickyshort.blogspot.com/
WWW 198267046870499  
IP Logged
 
Just Me
Full Member
***
Offline


ALK Member

Posts: 151
Gender: female
Re: Communicating with people vs. spirits
Reply #3 - Jan 26th, 2012 at 12:21pm
 
Hi Vicky,

It's so nice to know I'm not alone in all this (smile). While it needs some "cleaning up" I love how the internet connects us with people and information we would probably never be exposed to in our own lives/environments.

I was watching one of those news shows (ie. 20/20,  Dateline...) but can't recall which one. They were interviewing a guy about a book he had written about how people make "snap judgments" about other people and immediately determine what "category" they fit in before the person ever opens their mouth. It was a really interesting segment because his point was about how we need to move beyond these "quick judgments" and honestly get to know the other person. I find myself knowing more than I ever wanted to know in some cases. Cheesy

Kind regards,
mj

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
recoverer
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 5027
Gender: male
Re: Communicating with people vs. spirits
Reply #4 - Jan 26th, 2012 at 1:36pm
 
MJD:

Thank you for sharing your experience. I don't think of myself as a person who senses people empathically, but I believe I do so more than I am fully conscious of. For example, there have been occasions when I met some bad vibes people, and right away I could sense this. On some occasions they were at odds with me right away because their negative way of being was opposed to my way of being. Later on I found that there was something negative about them.

I believe I need to pay more attention to sensing what people are about. I get the impression that I don't do so as much as you.

On a somwhat related note, sometimes I'm too open with strangers. I relate to them as if there shouldn't be any barriers between us. Sometimes they don't appreciate this.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Just Me
Full Member
***
Offline


ALK Member

Posts: 151
Gender: female
Re: Communicating with people vs. spirits
Reply #5 - Jan 26th, 2012 at 7:46pm
 
Hi Recoverer,

Thanks for your comments. I don't PURPOSELY do anything to sense other people. In some cases, I have actually ended up in the hospital (not aware at the time that I was experiencing someone else's injury or illness). I don't understand enough about it to know what's happening or how, but I have come to learn how to know if something is "mine" versus from somebody else.

I am also "too open" and tend to stay away from people because of it.

Kind regards,
mj
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Vicky
YaBB Administrator
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 2170
Colorado
Gender: female
Re: Communicating with people vs. spirits
Reply #6 - Jan 26th, 2012 at 9:16pm
 
Just Me wrote on Jan 26th, 2012 at 7:46pm:
but I have come to learn how to know if something is "mine" versus from somebody else.

Kind regards,
mj


MJ,

How have you come to distinguish this?  Did it take many experiences for you to learn this, or was there some way that you were able to notice something specifically which signified it? 

I too have had this happen to me, and it takes me a while before I can distinguish and separate what's mine and what's someone elses.  I still have trouble with it, so I'm curious if you have some pointers for me.  My experience hasn't been like an illness, as yours was.  That is pretty extreme!  My experiences seem to be more about emotions and feelings.
Back to top
 

Author of Persephone's Journey (Amazon.com)

http://www.vickyshort.blogspot.com/
WWW 198267046870499  
IP Logged
 
eric
Junior Member
**
Offline


ALK Member

Posts: 53
Re: Communicating with people vs. spirits
Reply #7 - Jan 26th, 2012 at 9:30pm
 
I don't consider myself an empath but I have noticed that sometimes I just "know" something about someone, and it's gotten stronger since utilizing Bruce's afterlife exploration techniques.

For example, the other day at work, an elderly woman passed by me and I just "knew" that her husband had been dead for ten years.  I also brushed shoulders with a gentlemen and immediately felt a voice in my head say, "He's a bad man," and I suddenly feared for my life.  I had to sit in the bathroom and recuperate, covered in goosebumps.  Very unnerving.

It's becoming more common as I go along, I expect that doors are being opened that cannot be closed.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Just Me
Full Member
***
Offline


ALK Member

Posts: 151
Gender: female
Re: Communicating with people vs. spirits
Reply #8 - Jan 26th, 2012 at 10:23pm
 
Vicky wrote on Jan 26th, 2012 at 9:16pm:
Just Me wrote on Jan 26th, 2012 at 7:46pm:
but I have come to learn how to know if something is "mine" versus from somebody else.

Kind regards,
mj


MJ,

How have you come to distinguish this?  Did it take many experiences for you to learn this, or was there some way that you were able to notice something specifically which signified it? 

I too have had this happen to me, and it takes me a while before I can distinguish and separate what's mine and what's someone elses.  I still have trouble with it, so I'm curious if you have some pointers for me.  My experience hasn't been like an illness, as yours was.  That is pretty extreme!  My experiences seem to be more about emotions and feelings.


Hi Vicky,

I had to laugh out loud at this question! Believe it or not, I drafted the exact same question to you and decided to delete it.

I don't have a special process for it. I just have to take "inventory" of my own stuff and if I can't connect the dots I know it's not mine. Nothing scientific at all! lol

The scariest experience I had was not being able to walk. I woke up to get ready for work and I fell flat on my face. I tried to get up but couldn't make my feet work. I had no idea what was wrong because I was fine when I went to bed. It took about four days for me to "recover" and during that time I was in excruciating pain with no known cause (to me). About two months later I learned that a family member had surgery on both feet during that time. I have also developed burns, welts, scars and other signs of injury when I haven't been hurt (later confirmed to be someone else's). All of those have been no contact types.

I also can feel things if I touch someone. My brother is not very talkative. One day, he was visiting us and we were laying on my bed watching a movie together. I reached across to rub his hand just as a gesture of I'm glad you're here (he just returned from Afghanistan a few weeks prior). I immediately drew back because I could feel every ache and pain he was experiencing. I asked him if he was okay and he just kind of nodded. I told him he could talk to me about anything and I would be willing to listen. He never told me what happened to him during the war and I didn't press him on it. Yet, for several minutes I had the actual physical experience of his experiences. I try very hard not to get close to people or touch anyone because it still shocks me when it happens. It's unnerving to say the least!

Until a few years ago I was not aware of any of these types of things. I knew I was experiencing them, but I certainly didn't know there was a name for it or that other people could possibly understand. I still have never told anyone in my non-internet life. Of course my spouse knows because we've been together so long, but nobody else. Where would I even begin with something like this?  Shocked

Sorry I couldn't be more helpful and offer practical advice. I'll keep you posted should I have any revelations.

Kind regards,
mj
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Just Me
Full Member
***
Offline


ALK Member

Posts: 151
Gender: female
Re: Communicating with people vs. spirits
Reply #9 - Jan 28th, 2012 at 3:07am
 
eric wrote on Jan 26th, 2012 at 9:30pm:
I expect that doors are being opened that cannot be closed.


Hi Eric,

I've always understood that doors can be closed if we ask for it to be so. I'm not exactly sure how it's done or how it's granted, but I've been told it's possible.

Although I'm a bit embarrassed to admit these things, I feel it's the only way I can find some answers. When I was growing up, I not only experienced physical symptoms from other people I had many premonition type dreams. I had a dream of a family event in which some family members faces were disappearing. All of the ones that happened to died an "untimely" death (I don't mean they weren't meant to pass as that's obviously not true, but they all died earlier than statistically expected). I had a dream about a man breaking into our house and something was pulling at my arm. I got up and our back door was left unlocked. I locked it and whatever was there keeping me awake let me sleep. I've even had experiences where I'm wide awake and the space/time around me completely changes like I'm seeing yesteryear for several minutes.

I did ask to stop having nightmares because it was very frightening. I don't have as many premonition type dreams as I once did, but they still happen sometimes. I have never asked for the other things to stop because I think it's happening for a reason. I still don't know what I'm supposed to be "getting" from these messages or what I'm supposed to do with them, but I know I didn't imagine them. It's really hard to feel so alone with these experiences so it's nice to be able to write about it here. Although, I must admit, I still pause every time I type a message because I don't know if it just seems totally out there.

Anyway...trust yourself and ask for what you need. Your Higher self (or guide or whomever you depend on to help you in all this) will be there. They say the human mind will not allow it to experience anything it's not ready to experience.

Kind regards,
mj

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Focus27
Full Member
***
Offline


ALK Member

Posts: 183
Re: Communicating with people vs. spirits
Reply #10 - Jan 30th, 2012 at 5:00am
 
I love when we talk about spirits... almost everyone seems to agree that we have "good" spirits and "evil spirits"

Just what are these evil spirits? Are they possibly another form of being... such as demons? Or are they just spirits of intelligent life in general that decided they enjoy hurting others?

These evil spirits... tortured souls that are stuck in a reality of needing to hurt others?

Hows does one become one of these spirits?

Will I become an evil spirit when I die?

I think these are all valid and interesting questions. I enjoy pushing peoples buttons of course, but do I really want to hurt anyone? And, in the end "evil spirits" are always toted as wanting to hurt but being unable to hurt you unless you "allow" them... so what point is there of them existing then?

I mean, I really don't want to be an evil spirit unless I can have a grotesque demon body of incredible power and really have some fun with it......

Just saying.....
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
heisenberg69
Super Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 504
England
Gender: male
Re: Communicating with people vs. spirits
Reply #11 - Jan 30th, 2012 at 5:31am
 
I believe 'evil' is a relative term i.e evil compared to what ? I have met people who I would cross the street to avoid and assuming that people's personality survives death and does'nt change much on the transition then logically these people become spirits we may wish to avoid.I think we have the choice whether we focus on them or on a more evolved, loving source.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Focus27
Full Member
***
Offline


ALK Member

Posts: 183
Re: Communicating with people vs. spirits
Reply #12 - Jan 30th, 2012 at 7:39am
 
My point is still there. If being evil doesn't entail really cool Japanese Anime style grotesque body and strong powers and cool combat with the hero, I just don't see the point. I would be all over that L.A. Blue girl Wink
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Just Me
Full Member
***
Offline


ALK Member

Posts: 151
Gender: female
Re: Communicating with people vs. spirits
Reply #13 - Jan 30th, 2012 at 10:32am
 
But, isn't was Heisenberg said the point? Only we define what is evil (based on our perceptions) and if we want to engage with it, right? I don't find that particularly easy to do in the physical realm but I'm not sure anyone said it was supposed to be easy.

When you think about people you consider evil, do you think they consider themselves to be evil or do you think the rational mind allows us to rationalize our own behaviors, however, atrocious?

Kind regards,
mj
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
recoverer
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 5027
Gender: male
Re: Communicating with people vs. spirits
Reply #14 - Jan 30th, 2012 at 1:56pm
 
I don't agree with the below. Say a little girl is forced to be a prostitute. I don't care what culture or galaxy a person comes from, it is a very negative thing when a little girl is forced to be a prostitute. The same is true with a lot of things such as when a husband beats his wife. It is not relative.

Sometimes people get into this moral relativism business because they want to be more loving and therefore non-judgmental.  It is fine to be non-judgmental, but another very significant part of love is compassion. When we listen to our hearts intellect based moral relativism gets thrown out the window. It is quite easy to see whether the action that is taking place is good or bad. If somebody such as a little girl is harmed, and we listen to our heart and consider her welfare, there is no way we can deny that something bad is happening to her.

Last night I watched "The Pianist."  The movie is based on a true story. What happened to the Jewish people in the "true" story the movie was based on was horrible. It is okay for our souls to recognize when something unjust is done.

Some people might wonder why I speak against somebody such as Neale Donald Walsch. One of the reasons is that he makes God sound like a dimwit who doesn't understand the difference between right and wrong. I don't mean that God is judgmental, but certainly God understands when the evil actions of some cause others to suffer. Certainly God cares about when people are harmed, just as any loving person or being would care. I believe Walsch is poisoning people's mind with his moral relativistic BS.


heisenberg69 wrote on Jan 30th, 2012 at 5:31am:
I believe 'evil' is a relative term i.e evil compared to what ? I have met people who I would cross the street to avoid and assuming that people's personality survives death and does'nt change much on the transition then logically these people become spirits we may wish to avoid.I think we have the choice whether we focus on them or on a more evolved, loving source.

Back to top
« Last Edit: Jan 30th, 2012 at 6:08pm by recoverer »  
 
IP Logged
 
Volu
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 468
Right here and right there
Re: Communicating with people vs. spirits
Reply #15 - Jan 30th, 2012 at 4:18pm
 
recoverer,
"I believe Walsch is poisoning people's mind with his moral relativistic BS."

Enter cheek turning and walsch's part in the movie is that of an extra. New waves help turn the tide, all you need is love. Unconditional love. Infinite love is the only truth, everything else is illusion.

At the end of the day, there are as many views of what constitutes bullshit as there are flies, and we've all got a buzz for our special spots.

If a significant part of love is compassion, then good luck on your path walsch and light 'n lovers, and may playing the victim not be a hindrance to the effect of being rocks blocking the the light to what it means to make one's own supposedly well-weighted choices and the following consequences.

Boiled down, all bullshit aside, the short of it is simply good luck.
Back to top
 

Vegetarian is an old indian word for bad hunter.
 
IP Logged
 
recoverer
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 5027
Gender: male
Re: Communicating with people vs. spirits
Reply #16 - Jan 30th, 2012 at 6:15pm
 
I meant "The Pianist," not "The Piano Player."
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
recoverer
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 5027
Gender: male
Re: Communicating with people vs. spirits
Reply #17 - Jan 30th, 2012 at 6:23pm
 
I believe it is hard to know what evil beings are all about. Perhaps the only way to know is to go where they are and find out. But that would probably be a bad idea.

If we basically live according to love, I don't believe that we have to worry about becoming an evil being after death.

Focus27 wrote on Jan 30th, 2012 at 5:00am:
I love when we talk about spirits... almost everyone seems to agree that we have "good" spirits and "evil spirits"

Just what are these evil spirits? Are they possibly another form of being... such as demons? Or are they just spirits of intelligent life in general that decided they enjoy hurting others?

These evil spirits... tortured souls that are stuck in a reality of needing to hurt others?

Hows does one become one of these spirits?

Will I become an evil spirit when I die?

I think these are all valid and interesting questions. I enjoy pushing peoples buttons of course, but do I really want to hurt anyone? And, in the end "evil spirits" are always toted as wanting to hurt but being unable to hurt you unless you "allow" them... so what point is there of them existing then?

I mean, I really don't want to be an evil spirit unless I can have a grotesque demon body of incredible power and really have some fun with it......

Just saying.....

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
recoverer
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 5027
Gender: male
Re: Communicating with people vs. spirits
Reply #18 - Jan 30th, 2012 at 6:24pm
 
I believe it's BS for a guy to claim that he channels God when he doesn't.


Volu wrote on Jan 30th, 2012 at 4:18pm:
recoverer,
"I believe Walsch is poisoning people's mind with his moral relativistic BS."

Enter cheek turning and walsch's part in the movie is that of an extra. New waves help turn the tide, all you need is love. Unconditional love. Infinite love is the only truth, everything else is illusion.

At the end of the day, there are as many views of what constitutes bullshit as there are flies, and we've all got a buzz for our special spots.

If a significant part of love is compassion, then good luck on your path walsch and light 'n lovers, and may playing the victim not be a hindrance to the effect of being rocks blocking the the light to what it means to make one's own supposedly well-weighted choices and the following consequences.

Boiled down, all bullshit aside, the short of it is simply good luck.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
heisenberg69
Super Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 504
England
Gender: male
Re: Communicating with people vs. spirits
Reply #19 - Jan 30th, 2012 at 6:53pm
 
recoverer wrote on Jan 30th, 2012 at 1:56pm:
I don't agree with the below. Say a little girl is forced to be a prostitute. I don't care what culture or galaxy a person comes from, it is a very negative thing when a little girl is forced to be a prostitute. The same is true with a lot of things such as when a husband beats his wife. It is not relative.

Sometimes people get into this moral relativism business because they want to be more loving and therefore non-judgmental.  It is fine to be non-judgmental, but another very significant part of love is compassion. When we listen to our hearts intellect based moral relativism gets thrown out the window. It is quite easy to see whether the action that is taking place is good or bad. If somebody such as a little girl is harmed, and we listen to our heart and consider her welfare, there is no way we can deny that something bad is happening to her.

Last night I watched "The Pianist."  The movie is based on a true story. What happened to the Jewish people in the "true" story the movie was based on was horrible. It is okay for our souls to recognize when something unjust is done.

Some people might wonder why I speak against somebody such as Neale Donald Walsch. One of the reasons is that he makes God sound like a dimwit who doesn't understand the difference between right and wrong. I don't mean that God is judgmental, but certainly God understands when the evil actions of some cause others to suffer. Certainly God cares about when people are harmed, just as any loving person or being would care. I believe Walsch is poisoning people's mind with his moral relativistic BS.


heisenberg69 wrote on Jan 30th, 2012 at 5:31am:
I believe 'evil' is a relative term i.e evil compared to what ? I have met people who I would cross the street to avoid and assuming that people's personality survives death and does'nt change much on the transition then logically these people become spirits we may wish to avoid.I think we have the choice whether we focus on them or on a more evolved, loving source.



Recoverer-

no one is saying we don't make judgements - we make them all the time, its just that they are always embedded in a particular perspective.Its certainly true that the majority of modern western people (including me) believe that the examples you give are inherently wrong.But I can tell you that there are historical examples where those choices would have been considered the best ones in the situation e.g where prostitution was considered preferable to family starvation or a Victorian society where a respectable gentleman retained firm discipline in his home.The problem with moral absolutism is that there is the temptation to believe that the current worldview is the absolute correct moral one.I can guarantee you that in 100 years time some of our current moral choices will be seen as bordering on the wicked/evil, just as we would say that about sending small boys up chimneys 150 years ago or burning Protestants at the stake 500 years ago (interestingly the Catholics often believed that the flames 'cleansed' the heretics and may even save them from hell doing them a favour !).There is no reason to believe that we are at any absolute moral endpoint, but hopefully we are moving in a more PUL directed one ...

D

p.s I enjoyed The Pianist too !
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
recoverer
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 5027
Gender: male
Re: Communicating with people vs. spirits
Reply #20 - Jan 30th, 2012 at 7:25pm
 
heisenberg69:

I don't want to make the mistake of putting myself in a trap where I am not being able to determine what is appropriate on a moment to moment basis. Therefore, I view a situation according to what is happening now, rather than according to what happened at another time and place.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
heisenberg69
Super Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 504
England
Gender: male
Re: Communicating with people vs. spirits
Reply #21 - Jan 30th, 2012 at 7:30pm
 
Recoverer-

'I believe it's BS for a guy to claim that he channels God when he doesn't.'

I don't understand your antipathy to Walsch. Throughout history people have claimed to have a hot line to the Almighty.Turn the tv now onto the tele-evangelist channels and its all - 'God wants you to do this' or 'God hates that' or 'God says He wants your money'; everyone seems to know what God wants ! It seems strange to pick on Walsch for this. Although not a Walsch devotee, I think he has some thought provoking things to say and he seems one of the more benign ones of the bunch. He also admiits that these words come through the Neale Donald Walch filter and so are not The Final Word i.e infallible. Like anything we can show discernment and disregard that which does'nt resonate with us.

D
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
heisenberg69
Super Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 504
England
Gender: male
Re: Communicating with people vs. spirits
Reply #22 - Jan 30th, 2012 at 7:36pm
 
recoverer wrote on Jan 30th, 2012 at 7:25pm:
heisenberg69:

I don't want to make the mistake of putting myself in a trap where I am not being able to determine what is appropriate on a moment to moment basis. Therefore, I view a situation according to what is happening now, rather than according to what happened at another time and place.



Exactly- from a perspective embedded within a particular time and place. Nothing wrong with that we all do it.

D
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 
Send Topic Print


This is a Peer Moderated Forum. You can report Posting Guideline violations.