http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wnYJS5lg72w&feature=related

The above talk on the last door is the reason I have a high degree of certainty that DH IS a realized being.

1. Note his appearance... he claims that when he realized himself and withdrew from the world for ten years... he lost contact with his body... it took those ten years to decide to function in the world and then learn to reconnect with a body... he suggests he is not in his body now... but he has learned to make it work... you can see he is not the dapper dan he was when he was riding high as the owner of the one of the largest psychiatric practices in the country in Manhattan... if that checks out then... then at least we know he is telling the truth about that checkable point.

But further what he describes is the 'ego's' last stand... as I have said before it is an agonizing thing for the ego to surrender and that is the true allegory of the crucifixion... Buddha sits under the bodisatva tree and confronts his ego and realizes himself... Ramakrishna holds a sword to his heart and says to God reveal yourself or I want nothing to do this this earthly existence...

The last doorway is a major dark night of the soul...

S.

Here's a link about David Hawkins. Below is some more info about his grading system.  Remember, he claims to be a 970.

http://www3.telus.net/public/sarlo/Yhawkins.htm


"He purports, via his truth-dowsing AK, to assign a numerical value from 1 to 1000, or "calibration," to people, concepts, ideologies, corporations, countries, states of (no-)mind and more. Moreover, this scale is not linear but logarithmic. The mathematical details of all this are debunked in the Rick Ross Forum, but even the basic premise is over the top. "Logarithmic" means that every level: 200, 201, 202, etc is not just a tick higher than the last but ten times higher – more powerful, more godly, whatever – making the ordinary shmuck with integrity at 200 ten to the power of 800 less worthy than the one who has made it to 1000. (That's a one with 800 zeroes. Such orders of magnitude are used neither by atomic scientists nor astrophysicists, who use up to 40 at most.) As such, the scale is mind-bogglingly wide to the point of uselessness or bogosity (your choice).

Worse, there is said to be a cult-like element to Hawkins' scale whereby it is impervious to challenge: anyone who questions his results, or whose own results differ significantly, is by definition coming in below 200, the level of integrity, and therefore not worth listening to. This is a classic cult invalidation tactic, a circular logic catch-22 that skewers all deviation from the Official Line."

When did I say you didn't have the right to expose anyone whether you have facts or not... can you prove beyond a shadow of a doubt and beyond a moral certainty that he did not 'transcend'???

Can you prove beyond a shadow of a doubt and to a moral certainty that you talk to Jesus??

Pauli effect proved you were blowing smoke screens without substance just your proof of what Jesus told you.

A woman destroyied a work of art recently and her blog said God told her to do it.

Did God tell her to do it?

Lets see if someone comes up with information that Hawkin's claimed he ran or owned a large Manhattan psychiatric practice... that will go a long way to tell us something of his credibility.

S.

recoverer wrote on Apr 20^th, 2011 at 5:12pm:

Hey recoverer: You could solve the problem of who people can talk about and not talk about by drawing up a list of people who we are suppose to hate and not talk about send it to Bruce Moen and have him post it as people who are 'persona non-grata' for the site... then we know who we can talk about and who we cannot talk about.

S.

This is supposedly a mirror of an article that used to be on Wiki.

Obviously, whatever he is, he is very bright, which can be difficult.

http://domainhelp.search.com/reference/David_R._Hawkins

Why was it deleted from Wiki????

He really did write a book with Linus Pauling; it is on Amazon.

Hi Lucy: Thanks for posting that information. How did you get the mirror image?

Looks like he did have the big psychiatric practice in Manhattan then he has the 'enlightenment' event withdraws from the world his first wife divorces him and then he decides to come back... big mistake LOL!! ... I doubt he had a choice... then he launches himself into dissemination and collides with the realities of 'maya'... I think he has withdrawn again... one of the new age interviewers told me he no longer gives interviews and is not active anymore... luckily for the New age world he did leave the trilogy... for those with eyes to see... but he did make a big mistake publishing Power vs Force before 'Eye of the I'... that is the big work... all the rest is wallowing.

S.

Lucy wrote on Apr 21^st, 2011 at 3:40am:

Seraphis1,

If David ran a practice he might have met some people that eventually surrendered their egos by kicking the bucket, and some of them might not even have had any belief system platforms or knowns about the "afterlife" to rely on. If he has claimed he's a realized being he might imo have a lot to surrender ego wise, as that seems to a biggie in his world. I haven't met any realized beings on earth, but many whom I like and respect.

I realize you might have come to a point where you feel you must defend him and/or the words he speak, maybe cos you like him a lot and dissent also then becomes directed at you? Maybe you feel that any dislikes are shooting his words down in flames, that it's duly unjust? David also seems to think that experience is the great teacher, and one of those nuggets of experience on earth is that we have different views. We view the picture from different angles, and even though his, your or mine angles are treasured by the respective parties, others might not. I hear he has some to offer, but not attracted to his words. But so what if there isn't any attraction of like, you still like him, and isn't that enough? Have you heard his thoughts about changing the world?