Hi folks,
sorry if the title's a little abstruse, but you may be interested in the following link, which came from David Icke's headlines:
http://www.mayanmajix.com/art2016.html

which gives a new scientific rationale behind oft dismissed subjects like spirituality, clairvoyance and a whole bunch of other things. It would appear that 'junk' DNA is anything but, and I'm guessing that this article may provide a physical point of contact for our experience of Focus levels and OOB experiences.

Comments, and thoughts folks?

Best wishes,
David (currently completely snowed in in the U.K!!!  )

It is pure foolishness to be so skeptical about something as logical as Dr. Garjajev's claims.  The double secret probationary inner circles of science have known about these DNA claims since Aristotle discovered magnetism.  Alfred Einstein even wrote about this topic in his book Mien Kampf, stating that it came to him in a "eureka moment after waking in a bathtub full of ice with one of my kidneys missing!"  So come on, how much more proof do you need?!?! 

Quote:




   This part from the link you included reminded me of what Royal Raymond Rife discovered:
http://www.rense.com/general31/rife.htm

   He successfully found the frequencies of most all diseases, including cancer. He achieved 100 percent cures using light frequencies way back in the 1930's. Unfortunately for the world, greed and corruption in the medical field destroyed this great discovery for continued profit; another reason I despise human nature (not all humans, just many of them).

   Some people have rediscovered his invention and market it under Ray Beam Light and Sound. Thanks to Robert Monroe, we can use sound waves to access the higher focus levels. I have discovered that using both light and sound together also has benefits in mind expansion, as I also use my mind machine in meditation (also called an electronic brainwave synchronizer):
http://www.natures-energies.com/brain_wave_synchronizer.htm
Many times though, I find that just using binaural sound waves better for natural visualization in higher focus levels. The artificial lights can be a distraction; which is good for imagination enhancement, but limited to that.

IMJC...that was funny.

As for the frequency stuff...my guidance has been pinging me for months about frequency and how our future is going to depend on an understanding of frequency and its ability to greatly enhance life on earth through our manipulating it energetically.  I am not scientifically inclined so I am not sure why he/she/it is getting after me so strongly.  Maybe someone here is supposed to get something out of my words?

  Bless your naive heart Matthew, because it mostly comes from a deep goodness of heart. 

  Yet, the reality is that there is a lot of greed and corruption in the medical industry and has been for a long time.  Medicine shouldn't have ever become a profitable business model and system.   This is akin to the mistake we made with politics so long ago when we let campaign fund-raising become so involved, or lobbyists influence in bill making or amending.   Now we get many bought and paid for politicians.  We have so many special interest groups involved and boy they have so much more say than the average person.

  Back to medicine: But because it has become a for profit business, the bottom line is a huge part of driving psychology of many in same, and because of that there have been efforts to block, suppress, mis characterize, etc, etc. modalities and methods which though "unusual" and not well tested, could and have helped people tremendously in facilitating true health and not just treating symptoms.  Treating symptoms is what modern mainstream medicine primarily focuses on and does that primarily through largely toxic (to varying degrees depending on which one we are talking about) pharmaceutical drugs.

  But in any case, in all reality, most cures can be found in a combo of diet change, attitude-thought pattern changes, exercise changes, and spinal adjustments.  Some people aren't spiritually meant to be "cured" in this life anyway, because they are learning valuable spiritual lessons through their sickness and/or family members and loved ones are.

   Disease is BIG business, and Pharmaceutical Corporations make some of the hugest profits in the world.   They also are the primary funders of education in the medical world.  As well as political influence and reforms that affect the medical world.

  You think if there was really a simple, affordable, non patentable Cancer cure that developed, that these greed and power hungry corporations wouldn't try to squash it as fast as they became aware of it?   If there is such a reality as corporate espionage, which there is, then there is also plenty of time, money, effort and focus spent on becoming aware of and squashing very effective, affordable, alternative therapies.

   So naive my friend, so naive.  Wake up, our country is in it's death throws as we speak, collapsing under the imponderable weight of its own collective greed, selfishness, and materialism. 

  With all that said, there are plenty of people like you in the mainstream medical world who have good intentions and truly want to see people healed.   Many of these, like you, are in the "frontlines" so to speak and deal with patients more directly. 

But what about the Insurance and Pharmaceutical corporations?  How many CEO's and board members in these groups truly want to see an end to illness, as it would mean an end to their material addictions, obscene salaries, and livelihood?

  Check out the documentary called "The Corporation" to get an insight in to the typical mindset of these folks and these collective "entities".  It's borderline sociopathic, and about as far from PUL as you can get.

DocM wrote on Aug 4^th, 2011 at 1:07am:


  I don't know about the therapy/device that Ralph and others mentioned, but i am aware of other therapies with merit, which did start to garner attention and quickly were "dealt with" by the corrupt powers that be.   For an example, the Essiac herbal tea.   

   Simple, affordable, very low toxicity and side effects in many cases, not just treating symptoms, and quite simply not profitable to the medical world.  Hence there were steps to try to squash it. 

Quote:


  I agree, and well said in the above.  Even with various kinds of "energy healing", i don't often understand why so many get hung up on the forms, and feel like they have to learn Reiki or what not, in order to heal. 

  One heals by their intention, and the ability to step outside of self a bit and channel a more purely creative, constructive consciousness.  For me, this is love in the PUUL sense (Bruce's "PUL" with an extra U for Universal).

  It is simple in its essence.   But, there are many different ways to facilitate healing.  I was speaking more to your strong words about the light/frequency healing device that others spoke of. 

  There is nothing limiting with honest skepticism, but unless you have repeated experience with it, it is limiting to speak so certainly about it and to basically call those interested in same, dupes, for their interest. 

   Let's have a more truly scientific mind.  Keep the mind open but skeptical. 

   Also i was trying to point out to you that perhaps in the case of this device, it hasn't been tested and brought out into the limelight not because it has no validity, but because there are corrupt forces that have something to gain by keeping truly effective therapies in the dark.  Really think about that last part for a moment or two. 

  I don't have any experience with this device myself, so i can't say one way or the other about it specifically, but i know how things tend to operate in this world.  This is a world that is filled with far, far, far more selfishness and materialism than it is with a more pure kind of PUUL like love. 

  That is well to remember before being so strongly certain about this or that therapy based on it's lack of mainstream popularity, use, etc. 

  Also, i have personal experience with your somewhat ingrained and biased medical mindset.  I've seen your biased "certainty" with issues that i have deep, repeated experience with, for example like psoriasis.  I remember you poo pooing Cayce's remedies for psoriasis, which have only helped me deal with mine far more effectively than any conventional, mainstream medical one. 

    Experience to me, is far, far more powerful than theory.  It is a theory, and a false one at that, that psoriasis is caused only by genetics and is incurable, which is the prevailing belief and teaching in your world.  Not only is that false, but your world would label me a criminal if i came out and told people, i could help them cure their psoriasis without any drugs, even though this is truth.   In my mind, this is quite messed up. 

  I know the above, because when i am disciplined in my diet and general health lifestyle (including proper amounts of exercise, stress management via mediation, etc), it disappears and it's like i don't have it.   If i had enough discipline, i could completely cure myself of it, but i don't and so i have it sometimes very mildly and often not much at all.  Also, i really could use regular Chiropractic work, but can't afford it.  This is one contributing reason of why it doesn't fully go away for good as i do tend to have some spinal issues. 

   

Hi Matthew,

   Yes, you are very correct that belief is and can be very powerful stuff.  What you said about shamanism, etc. reminds me also of the placebo effect. 

    All i can say is that i know in my case, this is not primarily about beliefs and placebo effect.  I know this through methodical observation, and recalling past events before i had any such beliefs but still had psoriasis.  By noting patterns.  I've become very tuned in and sensitive to my body and it's reactions.

   I will give you an example.  After i started to clean up my diet a lot, one of few semi-sweet things i indulged in more regularly was a home made hot chocolate made with non alkalized cocoa, small amounts much less refined sugars mixed with a little stevia, a pinch of "Real Salt", some and some goat milk and/or coconut cream.  The main ingredient by far, water.

   I believed (and strongly so for awhile) that this was healthy and good for me, because i read so much glowing recommendations about the health benefits of less processed cocoa as long as one wasn't consuming much sugar or fat with same as in like chocolate bars and the like. 

    Yet i wryly note, clearly my body did not share this belief, and it certainly had no positive placebo effect.  Eventually i learned through observation that large amounts of chocolate in any form really exacerbated psoriasis symptoms of my body.   When i almost completely eliminated it from my diet, it really helped clear up symptoms. 

   Some of my path as been akin to the above trial and error, despite whatever beliefs or preconceptions i've held and much help as come from following the Cayce's suggestions for these.   But, one constant in both cases is the huge effect that diet in particular has on psoriasis.   Looking back even before i got involved with Cayce's work and info, i noticed some of these patterns as well, before i had any "beliefs" in the validity of Cayce's work.   

   Now, could i project my particular diet onto everyone and say it will universally help all people whose body's have psoriasis? No, but i know that in many cases that diet is a key factor, and my diet probably could help many, for there are certain universals involved. 

Quote:


  I understand what you are saying in the above, and i get the relative logic which is applied.  Yet, you don't seem to be understanding a fundamental point that i'm trying to make. 

   Which is, many in the medical world who make obscene profits off of the business of disease and illness, the real PTB who because of their wealth and connections have a lot of material influence in the world, would not invest in a therapy that is extremely effective even if they could make a lot of money off it in the short term. 

  They are smart and aware enough to realize that if they want to continue to make obscene profits, they have to invest in treatments which have some helpfulness, but don't completely cure because they don't want to lose their customers and thus their profits.  We are just numbers and $ to them.  They have very little empathy let alone any attunement to PUL. 

Sounds pretty diabolical doesn't it, sounds pretty inhuman doesn't it?   

  Yet, pick someone like a Murdoch or Cheney and really tune into them.   There are more of these folks in this world than most would like to consider, and many of them are in positions of great material influence, power, and wealth, for like attracts, begets, and likes like.  They love and are addicted Mammon as crack addicts are addicted to crack and heed the attractive call of same. 

  This is why i referred to you as naive earlier, because you don't seem to see how many people like this there are involved in the world and who have a lot of material influence and say.  You, me, and the people here are the commoners. 
I'm not saying there is a grand, superbly connected conspiracy as found in some novels or movies, but there is enough greed and selfishness and secrecy as to spend plenty of time, effort, and money in keeping truly effective therapies under wraps as much as possible. 

And by under wraps, i mean non mainstream.   They know they cannot completely squash all truly effective and helpful therapies, but they can influence media, education, politics/laws/regulations, and economics enough to keep these non mainstream.   

  One such tactic is to scare people about these alternative methods, and many people, the majority by far, are more followers than truly independent thinkers or intuitives.  Many will listen to the mainstream news, magazines, etc.

   And btw, i don't ask that the conventional medical world be open to unproven homespun healers, i ask that alternative therapies simply be really considered, publicized, and tested out in a timely fashion.

   There is a big difference.  Yet, in reality there is very little funding, mainstream educations about, or testing of many, many alternative health therapies--especially here in the U.S.  Only in recent years have some even started to do studies involving herbal medicine despite that some popular drugs originally come from plants, trees, etc. and that humanity universally has been using these for thousands of years to treat illness. 

In the U.S. in particular, the sheer degree of closedmindedness and lack of attention to herbal medicine and in some cases stonewalling, is and has been ridiculous. 

  No, the PTB much prefer patentable chemical or molecular compounds made or isolated in labs.  There is much more money to made off these.   

  Yet, even in Europe which has had a more open minded approach to these, the PTB--the real money makers and decision shakers, are cracking down on these alternative therapies because they have garnered so much popularity there and people know these tend to work better than the pharmaceutical drugs and quite often with MUCH less side effects. 

    We probably could go back and forth with this for quite awhile, but there is no real point as we are coming from rather different perspectives on this and i've made most of the salient points.   This has been more for the eyes of others on the fence.