DocM
|
Hi Albert,
While you and I agree on much, we disagree on a few things here, and it is worth presenting both sides (I guess that's what makes forums lively).
With regard to physiology, your explanation of how the afferent nerves conduct pain, does not hold water. There have been many animal and human studies that have correlated the severing of a nerve root near the dorsal horn of the spinal cord with burning sciatica type pain (called paresthesias) from further down the path. Remember, the brain takes the firing of synapses up and down the dorsal root, and does its best to interpret the result in consciousness. To any neurophysiologist, this is not in question (as you seem to suggest that it is). I can, if you wish put in a whole bibliography of published reports that correlate damage in the spinal nerve roots, with symptoms below these areas. There is no real surprise to this for that stimulus from the skin/muscle or tendon, must be transmitted up the nerve roots via synapses along the afferent horn to the brain in order to be perceived. Damage at any level in the dorsal root ganglion or the dorsal horn of the spinal cord, causes a sensation of pain corresponding to a level below the damaged nerve. Again, without sounding haughty, this physiology is neuroloscience 101, and so well supported that it is not in question. There are countless trauma victims who have had their spinal nerve roots cut in car crashes, wars, etc. and their resulting pain syndromes are as reproducible as 1+ 1=2.
Granted, the human condition does transcend the physical, at times. There are always cases of people who develop other neurosynaptic pathways, and confound their physicians. And I have seen people improve without surgery for slipped discs with nerve root compression. But there are many other explanations for these occurrences, too tedious to go into (such as the gradual dissolution of the disc material and shrinkage of swelling around the injured nerve root over weeks to months).
Phantom pain makes absolute sense in that the brain tries to put together the input that comes to it. If I sever a leg below the knee, there is a feedback of afferent nerves to muscles/motor neurons that is disrupted. The brain and consciousness try to make sense of the lack of stimuli and damaged nerve endings that are left, and then there is a general sensation of pain. It is a type of confabulation or the conscious mind "filling in the blanks." Neural stimuli do travel in both directions, by the way, just by a different pathway. The efferent nerves will travel from motor neurons to muscles, and there is a natural feedback loop between the two.
The other area of disagreement I have is the need for psychological analysis in order to make spiritual progress. It may be helpful for some people - I grant you that - to address their pain, and question if there is something in their lives they haven't face.
To me, this is in fact an indulgence for some (not yourself) in ego based thinking, and makes the spiritual process much more complicated than the principal of love and faith really are.
Jesus' healing of a cripple should be no different than any healing you or I could accomplish. Jesus says as much when he says "your faith has healed you." Who is to say that most of our problems are psychological in the physical world? Jesus never needed to address this interaction, for he knew that belief/faith/conviction coupled to the thought of healing, always led to a healing. I know you are well versed in the New Testament, and I think you will find that none of the healings there required the ill person to confront a psychological problem first.
As often happens in conversations on this board, it all comes from our belief systems - yours and mine differs here. I believe, that for me, spiritual progress requires a transcending of the psychological issues to get straight to the source of love. But that is what works for me. If someone wants to go over their childhood memories, longings, etc. as a way to release fear, so be it. I see it as a form of going of on a tangent only to get back to the heart of spirituality. But that's what works for me.
Matthew
|