Copyrighted Logo

css menu by Css3Menu.com


 

Bruce's 5th book, a Home Study Course, is now available.
Books & Tapes by Bruce Moen
    Bruce's Blog now at http://www.afterlife-knowledge.com/blog....

  HomeHelpSearchLoginRegister  
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Imagination vs. Being-There (Read 5916 times)
PauliEffectt
Senior Member
****
Offline


ALK Member

Posts: 472
Gender: male
Imagination vs. Being-There
Dec 4th, 2010 at 8:09am
 
Hi!
I wonder how long it usually takes for anyone to go from just being physical and doing imaginations of retrievals (at best in Focus 10), to actually OBE/AP into these settings in full Technicolor and being non-physical present There, in Focus 23?

My lousy imaginations/impression retrievals, with very few inputs of emotions and almost no visual input, are probably to weak to do any difficult retrievals. So I would like to know when the shift takes place, if at all?

Are there people that never makes a full OBE into Focus 23, and just continue with Focus 10 retrievals/imaginations, year after year?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
supermodel
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 250
Indiana
Gender: female
Re: Imagination vs. Being-There
Reply #1 - Dec 4th, 2010 at 8:49am
 
It actually just happened for me. I can't really put a time frame on it.

If I'm understanding your post, it is important that you recognize that the quality of the images that you perceive is not as important as what you are actually perceiving.

There are times when my retrievals are in 3D color! Other times, things are grainy and I can't really make it out.

Have you read the Afterlife Guidebook..the 5th book in Bruce's series?
Back to top
 

Supermodel....
 
IP Logged
 
PauliEffectt
Senior Member
****
Offline


ALK Member

Posts: 472
Gender: male
Re: Imagination vs. Being-There
Reply #2 - Dec 4th, 2010 at 9:15am
 
Both the quality of images and what I perceive is equally important. It's important to be There too. Right now I only get non-visual impressions, and I'm quite well rooted in the physical too.

I've read all Moen's books, but it I could qualify for a re-read. Smiley
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Seraphis1
Super Member
*****
Offline


ALK Member

Posts: 1446
Re: Imagination vs. Being-There
Reply #3 - Dec 4th, 2010 at 7:27pm
 
PauliEffectt wrote on Dec 4th, 2010 at 8:09am:
Hi!
I wonder how long it usually takes for anyone to go from just being physical and doing imaginations of retrievals (at best in Focus 10), to actually OBE/AP into these settings in full Technicolor and being non-physical present There, in Focus 23?

My lousy imaginations/impression retrievals, with very few inputs of emotions and almost no visual input, are probably to weak to do any difficult retrievals. So I would like to know when the shift takes place, if at all?

Are there people that never makes a full OBE into Focus 23, and just continue with Focus 10 retrievals/imaginations, year after year?

Hi Pauli: I have come to realize that this work is far more involved and requires a good deal more foundation work to be full anything... we are able to do much of the basics just because of the 'braille' system fundamentals that Moen has developed and if you have the proper level of faith in what you are doing you can kind of stagger thru it... but the full blown stuff requires the developement of powerful psychice energy reservoirs... such as completely filling the three energy storage areas Robert Bruce talks about... you also must develope an capacity to absorb radiation... these guides must tone themselves down enormously to communicate this us... so it is a combination of us building the necessary capacity to absorb radiation and their ability to tone down to a level that is not dangerous to the retriever/communicator... I am sure there are a myriad of other skills, abilities and resource that need to be in ones arsenal for one to do anything full blown out there at this point in our discover that we CAN do non-physical things.

S.
Back to top
 

 
IP Logged
 
Vicky
YaBB Administrator
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 2170
Colorado
Gender: female
Re: Imagination vs. Being-There
Reply #4 - Dec 4th, 2010 at 9:13pm
 
We are beings who are so accustomed and well-adapted to multitasking our attention on many things at the same time that we rarely notice how little attention it actually takes to do something.  Whether it's driving, eating, watching TV, reading, working, walking, talking....you name it, and we can be doing it while also thinking about and doing other things.

Remember what it's like to have a great conversation with someone where you're both looking into each other's eyes, so engaged in that person and what they are saying, feeling, and thinking?  There's a strong connection that takes place when that happens.  When you really focus your attention on something, it's a much more real experience and you get more out of it. 

I'm beginning to take notice of how focused I am just doing everyday things, so I can get a feeling of remembering what it actually feels like to be strongly focused in the moment.  It's a whole different experience than when you're doing, thinking, or feeling other things at the same time. 

So imagine how difficult it is to focus that intensely while doing meditation, retrieval, and other nonphysical activity.  That's why daily practice is good, and why hemi-sync is such a helpful tool.  Learning to focus your attention and hold it there while balancing both sides of the brain are all it really takes to do the kind of intensity focus you're describing.  The kinds of psychic perception talked about in this thread are indeed amazing and useful abilities to have, and ones we all really do have.  But I've learned it's not necessary to first learn to have those abilities in order to then learn to have the types of intense-focus high-caliber experiences you're talking about.

Bruce and I have recently been talking a lot about this kind of thing and one thing I recently asked him was, "What exactly IS my awareness anyway?"  And he said that your awareness is everywhere, all at once, all the time.  And that what we normally think of as being our awareness is really just our focus of attention at any given moment.  True awareness is everywhere, and in order to experience anything we just focus our attention on it.  The more we focus, the more we shift, or phase, to that area of consciousness.  It starts with intention.  Intention is all it takes to put you There, whether you are aware of being there or not. 

The more you phase there, the more real it becomes to your senses of perception.  A very slight shift of phasing is what you're calling "imagination" type, and a more full shift of phasing is what you're calling OBE/AP type of experience.  It's not so much a matter of ability, capability, or experience, but is rather just a matter of your ability to focus your attention enough to the point of shifting more and more of your attention there.  The result is the effect of phasing your attention there so intently that it creates the OBE type of perception.

Of course, it's much more pleasurable an experience to really feel like you're there, and to really see, hear, smell, etc. as if it is a real physical experience.  However, even with little of that effect happening, you're still There and likely still perceiving some things, even if you are not completely aware that you are there perceiving nor aware of what you are perceiving.  Practicing the tools and techniques of what you know will eventually give you the type of experience you're seeking, and of course the more experience and validation you get, the easier it will become. 

Another important thing I recently learned or should I say "re-learned" (as I tend to ask the same types of questions of Bruce more than once!) is when I told Bruce that I am having trouble nonphysically tuning in and perceiving anything when I set out on an intention.  I try and try and try but I don't perceive anything.  "Why is that and what do I do about it?" I asked.  He said, "You're never actually NOT perceiving anything.  You're always perceiving something, it's just a matter of what you're aware of perceiving.  If you go into it with expectations of what you should be perceiving and what that should be like, then you will probably not be aware of what there is to perceive and you'll feel like you got nothing." 

He said to remember to follow my intention, then to go along with whatever I perceive in my awareness after that.  Just the act of making the intention has already placed me where I need to be in order to act on my intention.  The rest is a matter of trusting the process. 

I used to think that the trust part meant "being willing" or something like that.  But it's more of a letting go type of thing.  Like if someone were to tell you to relax, and you already think you are relaxed.  And they said, "No, really really relax."  That shift is like going from holding on tight to just letting go.  So the trust part is very much like that, and I think it does take practice and patience.  There are still lots of times when I get frustrated and feel like I'm not getting anything, and then there are those rare occasions where I just "let go" and automatically shift (phase) to where my intention took me in my awareness, and in a matter of a single moment I can suddenly no longer be aware that I'm physically sitting in a chair.  The effect of phasing can be so complete in so quick of a moment that you literally forget what you were doing just a moment ago.  The experience can be that real, that easily. 

So I'm still working hard at learning that technique myself.  All I know is that it works, though I'm not skilled at it yet.  But I do understand and trust the dynamics of it and I hope that how I'm describing it to you helps you too. 

Vicky
Back to top
 

Author of Persephone's Journey (Amazon.com)

http://www.vickyshort.blogspot.com/
WWW 198267046870499  
IP Logged
 
Seraphis1
Super Member
*****
Offline


ALK Member

Posts: 1446
Re: Imagination vs. Being-There
Reply #5 - Dec 4th, 2010 at 9:49pm
 
Vicky wrote on Dec 4th, 2010 at 9:13pm:
We are beings who are so accustomed and well-adapted to multitasking our attention on many things at the same time that we rarely notice how little attention it actually takes to do something.  Whether it's driving, eating, watching TV, reading, working, walking, talking....you name it, and we can be doing it while also thinking about and doing other things.

Remember what it's like to have a great conversation with someone where you're both looking into each other's eyes, so engaged in that person and what they are saying, feeling, and thinking?  There's a strong connection that takes place when that happens.  When you really focus your attention on something, it's a much more real experience and you get more out of it. 

I'm beginning to take notice of how focused I am just doing everyday things, so I can get a feeling of remembering what it actually feels like to be strongly focused in the moment.  It's a whole different experience than when you're doing, thinking, or feeling other things at the same time. 

So imagine how difficult it is to focus that intensely while doing meditation, retrieval, and other nonphysical activity.  That's why daily practice is good, and why hemi-sync is such a helpful tool.  Learning to focus your attention and hold it there while balancing both sides of the brain are all it really takes to do the kind of intensity focus you're describing.  The kinds of psychic perception talked about in this thread are indeed amazing and useful abilities to have, and ones we all really do have.  But I've learned it's not necessary to first learn to have those abilities in order to then learn to have the types of intense-focus high-caliber experiences you're talking about.

Bruce and I have recently been talking a lot about this kind of thing and one thing I recently asked him was, "What exactly IS my awareness anyway?"  And he said that your awareness is everywhere, all at once, all the time.  And that what we normally think of as being our awareness is really just our focus of attention at any given moment.  True awareness is everywhere, and in order to experience anything we just focus our attention on it.  The more we focus, the more we shift, or phase, to that area of consciousness.  It starts with intention.  Intention is all it takes to put you There, whether you are aware of being there or not. 

The more you phase there, the more real it becomes to your senses of perception.  A very slight shift of phasing is what you're calling "imagination" type, and a more full shift of phasing is what you're calling OBE/AP type of experience.  It's not so much a matter of ability, capability, or experience, but is rather just a matter of your ability to focus your attention enough to the point of shifting more and more of your attention there.  The result is the effect of phasing your attention there so intently that it creates the OBE type of perception.

Of course, it's much more pleasurable an experience to really feel like you're there, and to really see, hear, smell, etc. as if it is a real physical experience.  However, even with little of that effect happening, you're still There and likely still perceiving some things, even if you are not completely aware that you are there perceiving nor aware of what you are perceiving.  Practicing the tools and techniques of what you know will eventually give you the type of experience you're seeking, and of course the more experience and validation you get, the easier it will become. 

Another important thing I recently learned or should I say "re-learned" (as I tend to ask the same types of questions of Bruce more than once!) is when I told Bruce that I am having trouble nonphysically tuning in and perceiving anything when I set out on an intention.  I try and try and try but I don't perceive anything.  "Why is that and what do I do about it?" I asked.  He said, "You're never actually NOT perceiving anything.  You're always perceiving something, it's just a matter of what you're aware of perceiving.  If you go into it with expectations of what you should be perceiving and what that should be like, then you will probably not be aware of what there is to perceive and you'll feel like you got nothing." 

He said to remember to follow my intention, then to go along with whatever I perceive in my awareness after that.  Just the act of making the intention has already placed me where I need to be in order to act on my intention.  The rest is a matter of trusting the process. 

I used to think that the trust part meant "being willing" or something like that.  But it's more of a letting go type of thing.  Like if someone were to tell you to relax, and you already think you are relaxed.  And they said, "No, really really relax."  That shift is like going from holding on tight to just letting go.  So the trust part is very much like that, and I think it does take practice and patience.  There are still lots of times when I get frustrated and feel like I'm not getting anything, and then there are those rare occasions where I just "let go" and automatically shift (phase) to where my intention took me in my awareness, and in a matter of a single moment I can suddenly no longer be aware that I'm physically sitting in a chair.  The effect of phasing can be so complete in so quick of a moment that you literally forget what you were doing just a moment ago.  The experience can be that real, that easily. 

So I'm still working hard at learning that technique myself.  All I know is that it works, though I'm not skilled at it yet.  But I do understand and trust the dynamics of it and I hope that how I'm describing it to you helps you too. 

Vicky


Hi Vicky: Is the above homily, theory etc or resulted in experiential events and would you share them with us... I know and this is just me... it take me several days to psychically recover from a strong event... an I am still not actually participating say like for example... like William Buhlmann's description of entering what Moen would call a Hollow Heaven.. in which he encounters people in a church praying and then seeing him... knowing he is out of place they attack him and he must quickly exit the area...

As Buhlman describes it... it is like an Earth plane event...

I published an event here when I had a full blown o.b.e... in color and panorama which started in projecting to the TMI-crystal in the Nancy Penn lawn... to Hubble... the moon and to Mars that was weeks ago haven't had something like that since... and I have definitely tried... I have to admit I am not retriever by inclination but I've at least one spectacular retrieval... but, I do not do these things at will and it takes a long time to recover psychially from them I discover... so it would be nice to see session notes... to support commentary...

S.

S.
Back to top
 

 
IP Logged
 
spooky2
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 2368
Re: Imagination vs. Being-There
Reply #6 - Dec 4th, 2010 at 10:13pm
 
Good post, Vicky!

In addition to the "focus"- part I'd like to mention something I came across at a lucid dreaming website, I think it was the one of Stephen LaBerge, where it was pointed at the fact that of most of the time we "are here", functioning in the physical, we just can't remember (under normal conditions) what we'd done and what has been, or only very weakly. Only of those events which were extraordinary, when we were enthusiastic, present, emotional, we have a vivid memory of. So, being aware of this, we could actually state most of our life in the physcal is like a dream.

This makes me think of the Zen rule, to be fully in the here and now. Interestingly, it is the same rule as the one for having lucid dreams, or generally for focused awareness.

Now, it seems some are more, some less talented in making their focus of attention laser-like, so that they're focused only at a specific area.

From reading at different forums regarding OBEs/AP it seems to me if one isn't a natural, it's really difficult to achieve this ability through training. Not impossible though, I guess.

For me, it's difficult, I'm working on it. I've had a few OBEs and lucid dreams, so I know it's real (even more than real), but they were involuntary. What I did was phasing with a focus-overlay: I always was, to a more or less degree, aware of my physical body, and so I never felt totally "within" that nonphysical scene which I perceived; it's similar to daydreaming, but things happened there which actually are totally untypical for normal daydreaming. I have found details in these kind of phasing-trips which matched with details I later found in books written by full-OBEers. Some of those phasing-trips were very emotional and had a deep impact on me, despite their perceptional daydream-quality.

However, such partial phasings are often subject to doubt. It's just, they don't come over real enough, that's why many try to train their abilities of focusing into other areas of consciousness. There are different ways of doing so, all laid out broadly in the web. I guess everyone has to find the method which fits personally best.

Spooky
Back to top
 

"I'm going where the pavement turns to sand"&&Neil Young, "Thrasher"
 
IP Logged
 
Vicky
YaBB Administrator
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 2170
Colorado
Gender: female
Re: Imagination vs. Being-There
Reply #7 - Dec 4th, 2010 at 10:38pm
 
Hi Seraphis1

I am not much of an experienced retriever yet, but have had some beginner's luck, I guess you could say.  And I'm not knowledgeable enough to say I've been to any specific focus level or visited BSTs. 

I am speaking from my own personal experience, and I've learned how to speak the language because of what I've learned from Bruce.  We're close friends, by the way, so I get to pick his brain quite often. 

Some of my best examples to share are the ones I put in my book.  And when I get around to it, I definitely will be practicing the retrieval techniques on a regular basis.  I just have other things on my psychic/spiritual to-do list to learn first.  If I scatter myself all over the place, I can't really delve into something as much as is necessary for me to really grasp it.

I don't have trouble recovering and it's very exciting.  Maybe one of the most exciting and intense experiences of phasing that I've had was when I made contact with a woman who was deceased, as that was my intention.  Unfortunately I wasn't skilled enough to get a name, date, or anything verifiable.  But the experience was so real I don't doubt it's validity.

Immediately upon contact, I felt her physically grab my hand and pull me, and at that moment I was instantly out of body and feeling as if I were physically traveling through space at a few hundred miles per hour.  When I say physically, it's the same feeling in every way that a physical experience would be described, so that's what I mean by being so fully phased that it becomes a real, physical experience.

She took me to an office building, although I cannot be certain she was aware that I was with her, because the entire experience was as if I were with her while she was experiencing her last moments alive.  For me, the experience was me holding her hand the entire time, through which I was able to feel every emotion that she experienced.  For her, she was running down the corridor looking for an open door, wanting to hide from whomever was after her.  When we finally found an open room, we went inside but then noticed another entrace from across the room.  As she ran to the door to lock it, it opened up.  A man stepped through and killed her right in front of me, and I experienced her death as if it were happening to me.  Unfortunately my connection to her was abruptly cut off the moment she died.  The last thing I felt from her was her intense feeling of being scared to death, then an abrupt disconnection from all pain and feeling, then just peace.  And that was it...I was thrust back into my chair, able to once again physically feel myself sitting there.  I literally felt as if I had just physically experienced that entire episode.
Back to top
 

Author of Persephone's Journey (Amazon.com)

http://www.vickyshort.blogspot.com/
WWW 198267046870499  
IP Logged
 
Vicky
YaBB Administrator
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 2170
Colorado
Gender: female
Re: Imagination vs. Being-There
Reply #8 - Dec 4th, 2010 at 10:48pm
 
Hi Spooky,

Thank you! 

Yes, life does seem like one big daydream sometimes doesn't it.  I remember as a child being "out there" so often that my real life wasn't quite as real to me, but you know how grown-ups are, always trying to make you stay focused in the here and now.  It took me many years to remember how to phase out as a I grew older. 

I know that I have a lot more experience with OBEs than some people, like you.  But I still believe that it's not really that hard to learn to have them.  And I still fully believe everyone IS having them, but it's just a matter of learning to retain the memory of them. 

I really believe in what I've experienced and learned, and I am so inspired to finding out the best way to write about it to teach others who are where I've come from.  I guess you can say I'm just extremely passionate about it. 

You said <<Some of those phasing-trips were very emotional and had a deep impact on me, despite their perceptional daydream-quality. >>

And I still have those a lot of the time, and yes they are harder to want to believe in, but I believe in trusting the emotional/spiritual aspect more so than the perceptual quality.  The intense perceptual quality is quite a rush, but doesn't make it literally more real, just "feeling" more real. 

Vicky

Back to top
 

Author of Persephone's Journey (Amazon.com)

http://www.vickyshort.blogspot.com/
WWW 198267046870499  
IP Logged
 
supermodel
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 250
Indiana
Gender: female
Re: Imagination vs. Being-There
Reply #9 - Dec 4th, 2010 at 11:08pm
 
WOW Vicky awesome post!

Hey Spooky! Cheesy
Back to top
 

Supermodel....
 
IP Logged
 
Seraphis1
Super Member
*****
Offline


ALK Member

Posts: 1446
Re: Imagination vs. Being-There
Reply #10 - Dec 5th, 2010 at 10:44am
 
It all boils down to what are you trying to do!  Cool

S.
Back to top
 

 
IP Logged
 
spooky2
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 2368
Re: Imagination vs. Being-There
Reply #11 - Dec 6th, 2010 at 9:29pm
 
Thanks for your encouragement, Vicky.
I found an interesting (at least to me) parallel: I've read some reports of people who had an "awakening" and/or "liberation" experience, and there was something in it what rang a bell, and then I got it: The descriptions were very similar to the experience to become conscious within a dream (what's called a "lucid dream" then, and/or becoming aware/remembering an OBE). I just like to see pieces become a picture.  Smiley

Hey supermodel, I see you  Cheesy !

Seraphis said: "It all boils down to what are you trying to do!"
Well said, as when we would really know that, we'd be wise. But it would be as well true to say, it all boils down to what you perceive, to what you know, to what you've experienced etc. as that would trigger what you're trying to do. Seems we're in a circle, and being in it we're always at the start  Wink .

Spooky
Back to top
 

"I'm going where the pavement turns to sand"&&Neil Young, "Thrasher"
 
IP Logged
 
Vicky
YaBB Administrator
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 2170
Colorado
Gender: female
Re: Imagination vs. Being-There
Reply #12 - Dec 6th, 2010 at 9:57pm
 
Hey Spooky,

I've had that "awakening" feeling during an OBE.  Sometimes when I am in an OBE that I believe is physical reality but then realize it's an OBE, upon realization is when my perception becomes greater, in a bigger picture sort of way.  I feel more aware, more alive, and lighter.  Everything changes into what seems like just light and energy, but interestingly still looks like the physical. 

So those "higher" OBEs are something I wish I could make happen, but as yet I can't seem to.  I just keep setting intent and wait patiently hoping for another one.

Smiley
Back to top
 

Author of Persephone's Journey (Amazon.com)

http://www.vickyshort.blogspot.com/
WWW 198267046870499  
IP Logged
 
Bardo
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 291
Gender: male
Re: Imagination vs. Being-There
Reply #13 - Dec 7th, 2010 at 2:13pm
 
I feel like a kid watching a baseball game and dreaming of one day playing in the "big leagues". I read, I "understand", and I get intimations of your experiences through your posts. My own experiences are real, but so much less reliable in both frequency and fidelity. Until reading the posts on this site, I never had a desire to acutally project OOB. But now...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
spooky2
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 2368
Re: Imagination vs. Being-There
Reply #14 - Dec 7th, 2010 at 6:42pm
 
Hi Vicky,
yes, in one OBE I actually believed it was the physical, which was quite scary at the beginning, as I had no memory of how I got to this place. And once in a dream my visual perception became such sharp, precise, it was overwhelming. Jurgen Ziewe has a lot of reports of his OBEs with this enhanced perception in his book "Multidimensional Man", it's a real good read.
   I have started to again pay more attention to my dreams, and today I wrote some of them down, and then I remembered another brief dream episode, I stood at my kitchen table, and began to wonder why the left side of the table was clear, as there had to be a stack of papers. I looked again, and it just was my kitchen table, no papers. So I thought, well, hm, so I must have cleaned it up. Ha ha! I've been so close to wake up within this dream, but then I surrendered when facing that "real" blank kitchen table.

True, Bardo, it's something which is just too fascinating and promising to forget about it!

Spooky
Back to top
 

"I'm going where the pavement turns to sand"&&Neil Young, "Thrasher"
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print


This is a Peer Moderated Forum. You can report Posting Guideline violations.