Berserk2
|
I'm trying to decide which of these 2 claims is more absurd:
(1) Starcraft: "If I prove that it [am afterlife] does not [exist], my next plan is to kill my wife and as many people as I can. My parents had no right to give birth to me if there is no afterlife. No right whatsoever. They will pay for what I am going through."
(2) tgecks (Thomas): "I actually think Paul...was the first Anti-Christ, as we are practicing Pauline Christianity .... which has so very little to do with what Jeshua actually said and did."
Thnmas is vobviously ignorant of Christian preaching and values. I hate to break this to you, Thomas, but almost every church preaches on the Gospels more often than Paul's epistles. Secondly, Thomas does not know that Paul had to gain the approval for His Gospel of the eyewitnesses of Jesus' life and teaching (see e. g. Galatians 2:6-10). Also, Thomas is virtually a biblical illiterate, and so, he is unaware of the many agreements on basic issues between Paul and Jesus. If Thomas is actually willing to have his ignorance demonstrated in detail. I welcome the challenge!
It's not an easy vote because I'm convinced that Starcraft is merely expressing his frustration over the lack of attention to afterlife evidence on this site. He is being childish, but I don't believe he intends to harm his family.
Or perhaps Hawkeye's backpedaling just as I predicted he would is even more absurd. When confronted with paranormal experiences (1)-(10) in my thread "A Healing of a Cripple," he realizes that he can't dismiss them as "mere coincidences" and claim an IQ higher than a geranium. Thus refuted, his new cliam is "that these so called miracles can be explained as helpers from other dimensions using the appearance of Jesus so as not to scare, or in order to make the apparition acceptable to the receiver." What his implicit retraction overllooks is that only 2 of my 10 examples even involve an appearance of Jesus! Duh!
Don
|