ustewuz, I just checked and it looks like it's the same fellow.  Wikipedia characterizes him and Ken Wilbur as both developing a theory of everything (TOE), much in the manner of "My Big TOE, by our beloved Tom Campbell.  I know Beau has his own TOE.  Maybe we should all pool our thoughts and do a group TOE. Or would too many feet spoil the broth?

Lol, I don't think it will be a mess for you at all Pat. It'll be like butter. 

Superman came from a red sun...interesting.

Bingo Scott!

I saw a History Channel special on the Mayans and the date marking the end of the Mayan calendar.  The Mayan archaeologist pointed out that the Mayan descdendants themselves lament the Western New Age fuss about momumental changes on Dec. 21, 2012.  I have noted with amusement how many New Agers, fearing yet another decisive example of psychic woo woo, have backtracked and suggested that nothing dramatic or observable will occur on that date, but that an imperceptible change will begin to accelerate.  There is no limit to gullibility when the need for falsification tests is not respected.  The whole uproar is shades of the constant resetting of the date for Jesus' Second Coming, especially over the past 200 years.  When, once again, nothing observable happens, there will be one positive result: a further decline in the already dwindling public interest in New Age sensationalism.

Don

Any assessment of so-called biblical myth depends on one's familiarity with the evidence for historicity, that is, on the case for connections with eye witness testimony.  You lack the requisite familiarity with the field to do so in any sweeping way.  For example, you don't even know that biblical text that derives shortly after the Exodus.  Nor are you even aware of the evidence that connects Gospel testimony to the eyewitnesses.  Yet you continue to offer your vapid New Age pontifications with no evidence other than feel-good Beauistic resonance., Still, you embrace self-contradictory channeled materials, which can decisively be refuted when it can be historically checked out.  You are free to promote these ideas as well as your view that a particular dead classic rock star is Christ.  Why not Richie Valens instead?   Just be less dogmatic and don't let your Christian girlfriend catch a whiff of these eccentricities. 

Don 

I may be vapid Don, but I am willing to admit that. Unlike some who pontificate with no knowledge whatsoever of anything but mythology. I am far more well read than you could possibly imagine as you seem to lack very little imagination. The Bible story of Jesus is based on age old myth such Osiris and many others. The bible was written as a means to control a large population of "uppity" people. Prove me wrong sir, without using your fruit from the tainted tree of Christianity. Jesus was not a Christian nor was he trying to form just another church (Shh you are Shh). You can have your BuyBull for all time sir. But if you ever say that I don't know something because it does not meet your specifications I will point out how trapped you are in a religion that will never redeem you because you don't have to do the work for yourself. And sir is the truth. New age or no new age. I could care less. Best of luck to you, you bully.

Yours,

Beau