Copyrighted Logo

css menu by Css3Menu.com


 

Bruce's 5th book, a Home Study Course, is now available.
Books & Tapes by Bruce Moen
    Bruce's Blog now at http://www.afterlife-knowledge.com/blog....

  HomeHelpSearchLoginRegister  
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
New (Age?) Spiritual Teachers (Read 9132 times)
Lucy
Super Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1158
C1
Re: New (Age?) Spiritual Teachers
Reply #15 - Mar 22nd, 2010 at 7:00am
 
I have not been to TMI, though I have attended a weekend workshop that was given locally by a TMI outreach person.(let's see $200 vs $3000, easy choice).

I probably wouldn't go, not just becauseit is out of my price range but also because I find it dificult to sit still for extended periods of time and feel physically ill when I do. It does sound as though they save the best wine for the in-house party and the effects there are sometimes more intense. I have a set of tapes (yes cassettes) from years ago and they never cut it with me the way I hoped. I think resonant tuning sounds like the ghouls' chorus. But I think Bob Monroe was on to something.

I also think that one of the rules of being born here is that, just like everyone has to submit to gravity, everyone is born with clay feet.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Seraphis1
Super Member
*****
Offline


ALK Member

Posts: 1446
Re: New (Age?) Spiritual Teachers
Reply #16 - Mar 22nd, 2010 at 12:24pm
 
Lucy wrote on Mar 22nd, 2010 at 7:00am:
I have not been to TMI, though I have attended a weekend workshop that was given locally by a TMI outreach person.(let's see $200 vs $3000, easy choice).

I probably wouldn't go, not just becauseit is out of my price range but also because I find it dificult to sit still for extended periods of time and feel physically ill when I do. It does sound as though they save the best wine for the in-house party and the effects there are sometimes more intense. I have a set of tapes (yes cassettes) from years ago and they never cut it with me the way I hoped. I think resonant tuning sounds like the ghouls' chorus. But I think Bob Monroe was on to something.

I also think that one of the rules of being born here is that, just like everyone has to submit to gravity, everyone is born with clay feet.


Hi Lucy: May I ask - what are your spiritual goals.

S.
Back to top
 

 
IP Logged
 
recoverer
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 5027
Gender: male
Re: New (Age?) Spiritual Teachers
Reply #17 - Mar 22nd, 2010 at 1:12pm
 
Regarding what Seraphis wrote below:

Acceptance without investigation leads to cult members.

Before I say something about gurus, let me say something about making contact with one's higher self (in a disk sense) and spirit guidance. There are higher realms of being where spirits live completely according to love and good intentions. As long as you are certain you've made such a connection, you should be fine with the guidance you receive. You'll probably find that such guidance doesn't present you with a belief system to follow and doesn't take away your ability to think for yourself. Such guidance is more like having a friend that will point out when you're missing something, and will offer you perspectives you haven't considered. Such guidance understands that growth can be obtained when a person learns to figure things out "mainly" by his or herself, rather than being told what to believe.

Some people such as myself and apparently SHSS have really seen what the guru thing is about, and have come to understand that a responsible person who really understands something wouldn't present his or herself as a so-called enlightened being, because when one does so one basically claims that one has ultimate knowledge and what ones says is truer than other viewpoints.

When people conclude that another person is enlightened as he or she claims, then they often make the mistake of putting what this person says ahead their own experience, conscience, heart, intelligence and common sense. I've seen this happen to so many people. Until they get to the point where they stop giving another person so much power in determining what they believe, they won't be able to find out for themselves.

This being the case, any responsible person wouldn't make the mistake of setting themselves up as an authority figure other people won't question by claiming that he or she is enlightened or claiming he or she channels a being who has all of the answers; no need to look elsewhere or think differently.

Going by what I've seen, Robert Monroe and Bruce Moen don't fall into the above scenario, because neither of them were/are interested in being a guru who is put on a pedestal.

Regarding the pedestal, from a historical perspective, this is what the guru tradition is about. A disciple must surrender his or herself to the guru and turn the guru into an absolute authority figure that can't be questioned. A disciple must worship a guru as if he (or she) is god himself. Only a megalomaniacal self serving person would put his or herself in such a position. Only a dishonest (or deluded) person would claim that he or she holds the key to somebody else's spiritual welfare. Only an unethical, dishonest and heartless person would infringe upon another person's freedom and spiritual welfare to the degree guru's do.

We are all very small pieces of God to the same extent.

Therefore, I believe Spooky is wise to study Zen on his own, rather than believe he needs somebody else to tell him how to do so.




Seraphis1 wrote on Mar 21st, 2010 at 12:25am:
spooky2 wrote on Mar 20th, 2010 at 9:16pm:
I don't consider people to teach me something only because they have a sort of "degree". In spiritual belongs, a degree is of course much more doubtable than in science. I could declare a society of the "Golden Whatever" to be the owner of the truth, and me myself to be the top guru. Everyone can do this. So Lucy and Recoverer have my sympathy for their critical way on this. For example, I feel drawn to Zen, but I don't want to join a group or got me a teacher.

Spooky


Hi Spooky: how did you find Bruce Moen? How did you find Robert Monroe? You don't seem to have rejected either... I suspect you used common sense and instinct to chose to align with their teachings. Could you have made progress without either? The road is treacherous... the way is frougth with obstacles, miss direction... if you think you are going to negotiate this road to spiritual freedom alone you must be an avatar... because, there are some very daunting subtle things that we all need a guide to negotiate... I believe if you have a pure heart... true teachers and information will find you... you have free will... if you chose to reject it... then your path will be problematic... trust you gut... but avoid knee jerk rejection. Condemnation without investigation leads to ignorance.

S.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
betson
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 3445
SE USA
Gender: female
Re: New (Age?) Spiritual Teachers
Reply #18 - Mar 22nd, 2010 at 3:18pm
 
Hi

I mislabeled this thread.  It should be called it by the names of those two individuals I was interested in hearing more about. Then we could have said "Nope, never heard of them" and be done with it.  I certainly didn't mean to bring up this guru discussion again as we've had it many times.

Lucy made a good point that we could first google topics we generally want to know about. I did go to some sites on these guys but was not getting the viewpoints this site (you all Smiley ) provide. Since I rarely hear the word Maitreya anywhere but here I thought here I could get some good cross-referencing.

I don't believe either of these two are gurus. Patel seems to be a moral economist. I plan to read his latest book in that light, and as Lucy said, that won't make me a devotee.  Wink

Many thanks,
Bets
Back to top
 

There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio,
Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.
Shakespeare
 
IP Logged
 
Seraphis1
Super Member
*****
Offline


ALK Member

Posts: 1446
Re: New (Age?) Spiritual Teachers
Reply #19 - Mar 22nd, 2010 at 4:22pm
 
recoverer wrote on Mar 22nd, 2010 at 1:12pm:
Regarding what Seraphis wrote below:

Acceptance without investigation leads to cult members.

Before I say something about gurus, let me say something about making contact with one's higher self (in a disk sense) and spirit guidance. There are higher realms of being where spirits live completely according to love and good intentions. As long as you are certain you've made such a connection, you should be fine with the guidance you receive. You'll probably find that such guidance doesn't present you with a belief system to follow and doesn't take away your ability to think for yourself. Such guidance is more like having a friend that will point out when you're missing something, and will offer you perspectives you haven't considered. Such guidance understands that growth can be obtained when a person learns to figure things out "mainly" by his or herself, rather than being told what to believe.

Some people such as myself and apparently SHSS have really seen what the guru thing is about, and have come to understand that a responsible person who really understands something wouldn't present his or herself as a so-called enlightened being, because when one does so one basically claims that one has ultimate knowledge and what ones says is truer than other viewpoints.

When people conclude that another person is enlightened as he or she claims, then they often make the mistake of putting what this person says ahead their own experience, conscience, heart, intelligence and common sense. I've seen this happen to so many people. Until they get to the point where they stop giving another person so much power in determining what they believe, they won't be able to find out for themselves.

This being the case, any responsible person wouldn't make the mistake of setting themselves up as an authority figure other people won't question by claiming that he or she is enlightened or claiming he or she channels a being who has all of the answers; no need to look elsewhere or think differently.

Going by what I've seen, Robert Monroe and Bruce Moen don't fall into the above scenario, because neither of them were/are interested in being a guru who is put on a pedestal.

Regarding the pedestal, from a historical perspective, this is what the guru tradition is about. A disciple must surrender his or herself to the guru and turn the guru into an absolute authority figure that can't be questioned. A disciple must worship a guru as if he (or she) is god himself. Only a megalomaniacal self serving person would put his or herself in such a position. Only a dishonest (or deluded) person would claim that he or she holds the key to somebody else's spiritual welfare. Only an unethical, dishonest and heartless person would infringe upon another person's freedom and spiritual welfare to the degree guru's do.

We are all very small pieces of God to the same extent.

Therefore, I believe Spooky is wise to study Zen on his own, rather than believe he needs somebody else to tell him how to do so.




Seraphis1 wrote on Mar 21st, 2010 at 12:25am:
spooky2 wrote on Mar 20th, 2010 at 9:16pm:
I don't consider people to teach me something only because they have a sort of "degree". In spiritual belongs, a degree is of course much more doubtable than in science. I could declare a society of the "Golden Whatever" to be the owner of the truth, and me myself to be the top guru. Everyone can do this. So Lucy and Recoverer have my sympathy for their critical way on this. For example, I feel drawn to Zen, but I don't want to join a group or got me a teacher.

Spooky


Hi Spooky: how did you find Bruce Moen? How did you find Robert Monroe? You don't seem to have rejected either... I suspect you used common sense and instinct to chose to align with their teachings. Could you have made progress without either? The road is treacherous... the way is frougth with obstacles, miss direction... if you think you are going to negotiate this road to spiritual freedom alone you must be an avatar... because, there are some very daunting subtle things that we all need a guide to negotiate... I believe if you have a pure heart... true teachers and information will find you... you have free will... if you chose to reject it... then your path will be problematic... trust you gut... but avoid knee jerk rejection. Condemnation without investigation leads to ignorance.

S.




Hi: The problem I have with your observations is the name calling and personal attacks... it reduces your arguments to demogogery...

Life and especially the pursuit of enlightenment is an interaction of qualities. There is no necessity for personal involvement... all these teachers have established positionalities which are like computer programs... and not the Real Self... Truth just is... one either recognizes it or not... one can be fooled... one picks oneself up dusts oneself off and keep on truckin'.

The world holds an endless array of positions that are arbitrary presumptions which may or may not be fallacious. One can observe them and respect how they are seen and valued by others without personally subscribing to them. One can appreciate how the world sees but not be entrapped by it or them.

A paraphrasing from the work of Dr. David Hawkins.

S.
Back to top
 

 
IP Logged
 
Seraphis1
Super Member
*****
Offline


ALK Member

Posts: 1446
Re: New (Age?) Spiritual Teachers
Reply #20 - Mar 22nd, 2010 at 4:24pm
 
Seraphis1 wrote on Mar 22nd, 2010 at 4:22pm:
recoverer wrote on Mar 22nd, 2010 at 1:12pm:
Regarding what Seraphis wrote below:

Acceptance without investigation leads to cult members.

Before I say something about gurus, let me say something about making contact with one's higher self (in a disk sense) and spirit guidance. There are higher realms of being where spirits live completely according to love and good intentions. As long as you are certain you've made such a connection, you should be fine with the guidance you receive. You'll probably find that such guidance doesn't present you with a belief system to follow and doesn't take away your ability to think for yourself. Such guidance is more like having a friend that will point out when you're missing something, and will offer you perspectives you haven't considered. Such guidance understands that growth can be obtained when a person learns to figure things out "mainly" by his or herself, rather than being told what to believe.

Some people such as myself and apparently SHSS have really seen what the guru thing is about, and have come to understand that a responsible person who really understands something wouldn't present his or herself as a so-called enlightened being, because when one does so one basically claims that one has ultimate knowledge and what ones says is truer than other viewpoints.

When people conclude that another person is enlightened as he or she claims, then they often make the mistake of putting what this person says ahead their own experience, conscience, heart, intelligence and common sense. I've seen this happen to so many people. Until they get to the point where they stop giving another person so much power in determining what they believe, they won't be able to find out for themselves.

This being the case, any responsible person wouldn't make the mistake of setting themselves up as an authority figure other people won't question by claiming that he or she is enlightened or claiming he or she channels a being who has all of the answers; no need to look elsewhere or think differently.

Going by what I've seen, Robert Monroe and Bruce Moen don't fall into the above scenario, because neither of them were/are interested in being a guru who is put on a pedestal.

Regarding the pedestal, from a historical perspective, this is what the guru tradition is about. A disciple must surrender his or herself to the guru and turn the guru into an absolute authority figure that can't be questioned. A disciple must worship a guru as if he (or she) is god himself. Only a megalomaniacal self serving person would put his or herself in such a position. Only a dishonest (or deluded) person would claim that he or she holds the key to somebody else's spiritual welfare. Only an unethical, dishonest and heartless person would infringe upon another person's freedom and spiritual welfare to the degree guru's do.

We are all very small pieces of God to the same extent.

Therefore, I believe Spooky is wise to study Zen on his own, rather than believe he needs somebody else to tell him how to do so.




Seraphis1 wrote on Mar 21st, 2010 at 12:25am:
spooky2 wrote on Mar 20th, 2010 at 9:16pm:
I don't consider people to teach me something only because they have a sort of "degree". In spiritual belongs, a degree is of course much more doubtable than in science. I could declare a society of the "Golden Whatever" to be the owner of the truth, and me myself to be the top guru. Everyone can do this. So Lucy and Recoverer have my sympathy for their critical way on this. For example, I feel drawn to Zen, but I don't want to join a group or got me a teacher.

Spooky


Hi Spooky: how did you find Bruce Moen? How did you find Robert Monroe? You don't seem to have rejected either... I suspect you used common sense and instinct to chose to align with their teachings. Could you have made progress without either? The road is treacherous... the way is frougth with obstacles, miss direction... if you think you are going to negotiate this road to spiritual freedom alone you must be an avatar... because, there are some very daunting subtle things that we all need a guide to negotiate... I believe if you have a pure heart... true teachers and information will find you... you have free will... if you chose to reject it... then your path will be problematic... trust you gut... but avoid knee jerk rejection. Condemnation without investigation leads to ignorance.

S.




Hi: The problem I have with your observations is the name calling and personal attacks... it reduces your arguments to demogogery...

Life and especially the pursuit of enlightenment is an interaction of qualities. There is no necessity for personal involvement... all these teachers have established positionalities which are like computer programs... and not the Real Self... Truth just is... one either recognizes it or not... one can be fooled... one picks oneself up dusts oneself off and keep on truckin'.

The world holds an endless array of positions that are arbitrary presumptions which may or may not be fallacious. One can observe them and respect how they are seen and valued by others without personally subscribing to them. One can appreciate how the world sees but not be entrapped by it or them.

A paraphrasing from the work of Dr. David Hawkins thru the process of a meeting of the minds.

S.

Back to top
 

 
IP Logged
 
hawkeye
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 886
canada
Gender: male
Re: New (Age?) Spiritual Teachers
Reply #21 - Mar 22nd, 2010 at 4:33pm
 
I doubt anyone would regret going to TMI for Gateway. Worth every cent. Life changing. Spiritually uplifting. Fulfilling.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
recoverer
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 5027
Gender: male
Re: New (Age?) Spiritual Teachers
Reply #22 - Mar 22nd, 2010 at 5:00pm
 
Seraphis1 said: "Hi: The problem I have with your observations is the name calling and personal attacks... it reduces your arguments to demogogery...

Recoverer responds: "Name calling and personal attacks? I simply states the facts of what many gurus are about, and you reduce what I say to name calling and personal attacks?

How in tarnation can a person have a reasonable conversation about what gurus are about, if he or she can't say anything about them that isn't positive?

If a person won't allow his (or herself) to see when a guru does something negative, I don't see how he can discriminate what's going on.

Defending people without discrimination serves no positive purpose whatsover. All it does is enable the "many" people who seek to take advantage of others while claiming to be a valid source of information to get away with doing so.

I think you're barking up the wrong tree if you expect people on this forum to get involved with some sort of guru, because they are wise enough to find what they need without doing so.

I figure the gurus of this world can learn a thing or two from the people on this forum. I'd take advice from most of the people on this forum before I'd take it from a guru. Ulterior motives and believing you are superior in some way don't go along with giving advice to others (or in the case of gurus, being somebody's so-called spiritual master).

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
recoverer
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 5027
Gender: male
Re: New (Age?) Spiritual Teachers
Reply #23 - Mar 22nd, 2010 at 5:09pm
 
Hawkeye:

When you were at TMI did anybody tell you to bow to them, kiss their feet, drink their bath water, that they hold the key to your spiritual growth? I doubt it.

David Hawkins speaks about how enlightened, on a percentage basis, people who do the above, are. If he understood about them he would measure them according to megalomania rather than how enlightened they supposedly are.

Read the Guru Gita and you'll see what the guru game is about.

hawkeye wrote on Mar 22nd, 2010 at 4:33pm:
I doubt anyone would regret going to TMI for Gateway. Worth every cent. Life changing. Spiritually uplifting. Fulfilling. 

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Volu
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 468
Right here and right there
Re: New (Age?) Spiritual Teachers
Reply #24 - Mar 23rd, 2010 at 12:35pm
 
recoverer,

You've written some good and some excellent observations on gurus in this thread. For me this a sort of a pyramid structure, which can be found as a backbone structure all over the place on earth. What are your thoughts on god/jesus in a guru context? - I'm not interested in a discussion about this specific aspect, but curious about your thought process in this regard, if that is something you want to write about.
Back to top
 

Vegetarian is an old indian word for bad hunter.
 
IP Logged
 
recoverer
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 5027
Gender: male
Re: New (Age?) Spiritual Teachers
Reply #25 - Mar 23rd, 2010 at 2:22pm
 
Volu:

I can't say with any certainty what Jesus was all about. I don't know to what extent the gospels accurately represent his life and what he said. I don't believe he was a guru.

Perhaps he knew a thing or two about the afterlife and let people know. This is why he spoke in terms of as you sow so you reap. Not because God punishes you, but because your overall state of mind determines where you go after you die.

Perhaps he understood about the importance of living according to love and the golden rule.

I doubt that he wanted to be worshiped, or that he believed that fear, oppression and spirituality are a good mix.


Volu wrote on Mar 23rd, 2010 at 12:35pm:
recoverer,

You've written some good and some excellent observations on gurus in this thread. For me this a sort of a pyramid structure, which can be found as a backbone structure all over the place on earth. What are your thoughts on god/jesus in a guru context? - I'm not interested in a discussion about this specific aspect, but curious about your thought process in this regard, if that is something you want to write about.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
hawkeye
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 886
canada
Gender: male
Re: New (Age?) Spiritual Teachers
Reply #26 - Mar 23rd, 2010 at 2:34pm
 
Recoverer, No. Never at TMI. It was more about finding your own truth. No bowing, kissing feet, drinking bath water, or anything else like that. In fact Monroe, although developing the program and having a patent on Hemi Sync, really wasn't a big part of the week. It was very clear that we were to find out for our selves. That he didn't have our answers for us. There was this feeling of an immense amount of love that everone seemed to be picking up on.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
recoverer
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 5027
Gender: male
Re: New (Age?) Spiritual Teachers
Reply #27 - Mar 23rd, 2010 at 2:49pm
 
That's what I figured Hawkeye.

When I watch Robert Monroe on youtube he seems like a humble man who wasn't interested in having a bunch of followers.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print


This is a Peer Moderated Forum. You can report Posting Guideline violations.