People have dogmatic viewpoints partly because they listen to what other people have to say without having any experience that collaborate such viewpoints. It is easier to get people to follow such dogma if in some way you fear them into doing so.
On the other hand, some people believe in the Disk viewpoint because they "had" experiences that collaborated such a viewpoint.
Regarding such experiences being nothing more than imagination that is triggured by what somebody like Bruce has to say about the matter, it is possible to have the viewpoint validated in a way where it seems clear that this isn't the case.
There is also the matter of Bruce having a Disk vision before reading of such a thing. Ron Kruger had an NDE where he experienced his greater self in such a way, even though he didn't read or hear about such a thing beforehand. P.M.H. Atwater and Tom Sawyer experienced their greater self in such a way during their NDEs.
I know of another man, I can't remember his name at this time, shortly after World War two he also had a vision where he found out about things such as Oversouls without having first read or heard of such a thing.
It might've been difficult for Jesus to speak about reincarnation to the masses in a truthful way because he would've had to do so in a Disk way, and not many people in his day would be open to such a way of understanding.
I agree that information received through hypnosis isn't fully trustworthy and that some Ian Stevenson's cases might've been possession cases.
Berserk2 wrote on Jan 30th, 2015 at 2:14am:With the frequent dogmatic allusions to "the Jesus Disk,' this seems a good time to revisit the discussion of my critique of past life recall as evidence for reincarnation.