Copyrighted Logo

css menu by Css3Menu.com


 

Bruce's 5th book, a Home Study Course, is now available.
Books & Tapes by Bruce Moen
    Bruce's Blog now at http://www.afterlife-knowledge.com/blog....

  HomeHelpSearchLoginRegister  
 
Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print
The Watseka Wonder (Read 14085 times)
Berserk2
Super Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 844
Gender: male
The Watseka Wonder
Mar 3rd, 2010 at 5:54pm
 
Many parapsychologists consider the Lurancy Vennum case the most power evidence for an afterlife ever provided by a single case.  This case is often designated "The Watseka Wonder" and you can read a summary of it at this website:

www.prairieghosts.com/watseka.html

The possession involved in this case is for me a decisive way of refuting reincarnationist interpretations of past life recall.  Dude and other New Agers apparently need to duck the key points of my critique of reincarnation.  So I will eventually reissue them here refurbished.

Don
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
I Am Dude
Super Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1462
Gender: male
Re: The Watseka Wonder
Reply #1 - Mar 3rd, 2010 at 6:16pm
 
I acknowledge your key points.  I do not deny their possibility in certain cases.  However, your critique does not address my key points.  You are the one ducking.

I will give you another opportunity.

How do you interpret individuals with uncanny similarities with their "past life incarnations"?  Those who are able to accurately provide details about real individuals who have lived in the past who they claim have been their past lives, and the parallel traits these individuals share, such as nearly identical physical, mental, and emotional traits, including scars, marks, and diseases in the exact locations the "past life" incarnation had a significant injury.  Surely this is more than just a "spirit merger." 

One question for you.  What is the purpose of these spirit mergers, or as ES calls them, possessions.. why do these spirits do this?  And are you saying that every person alive is a "victim" of these spirit mergers/possessions?  Because almost every individual put under hypnosis is able to recall having a past life.

And what of the strikingly identical accounts of the afterlife, namely the life in between lives, which are prevalent among these subjects?  These individuals describe the planning and preparation of beginning a new incarnation after they are through with a previous one.  Although most of these individuals are completely unaware that such a thing even is possible before hand, they all describe nearly identical key aspects of this experience. This is something that neither of your "explanations" prove wrong, and must be taken seriously if one is going to examine this issue honestly.
Back to top
 

But seek first the kingdom of God and His righteousness, and all these things will be added unto you.
 
IP Logged
 
recoverer
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 5027
Gender: male
Re: The Watseka Wonder
Reply #2 - Mar 3rd, 2010 at 6:38pm
 
I don't believe it can be proven that reincarnation doesn't exist, by showing that some people get possessed.

Swedenborg says what he said, but what about people who have had NDEs where they clearly experienced higher levels of existence and yet they became aware of many if not all of their past incarnations. Such cases aren't a matter of being misled.





Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Berserk2
Super Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 844
Gender: male
Re: The Watseka Wonder
Reply #3 - Mar 3rd, 2010 at 7:03pm
 
Dude and recoverer,

Thank you for setting the table for my refutation of reincarnation.  It's fascinating that neither of you can detect your circular reasonsing and, yes, how you both persist in ducking my main points.  I'm swamped with other responsibilities right now, but stay tuned!

Don
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
recoverer
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 5027
Gender: male
Re: The Watseka Wonder
Reply #4 - Mar 3rd, 2010 at 8:46pm
 
Don:

What do you mean by circular reasoning?

It is really hard to believe that everybody who has a past life memory is possessed.

Regarding the NDE reference I made, I've read a few NDEs where people experienced a very high state of consciousness, and at some point they made contact with their soul/higher self/total self/whatever, and experienced their past incarnations. At the same time they would experience a life review in a manner where no details were left out.

Because of the depth of what they experienced, it is hard to imagine that as Emanuel Swedenborg suggests some lower level beings misled them about having past lives.

One time I went into an expanded state of awareness (while feeling love, peace and divinity) and made contact with my disk in a manner where I saw other members that represented past lives. The impression I got is that each of them still exists, and I'm an extension of the disk they are a part of.

Because of the other information I received during this experience, because of my intent, because of past experiences, and because of what I felt, it is hard to believe that I experienced something that was the result of my imagination, or was some form of deception.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
usetawuz
Senior Member
****
Offline


ALK Member

Posts: 397
ne fla
Gender: male
Re: The Watseka Wonder
Reply #5 - Mar 3rd, 2010 at 10:45pm
 
Wow, Don.  You are biting off a chunk here.

No one you have ever lived with, who is significant in your current life, who has any impact on you day to day, is anyone you have lived with before?  You are kidding, right? 

What you say is that everyone who perceives any previous life, a significant connection to another soul, is either possessed or mistaken?  Do you not feel the connection to your parents, your siblings, aunts, uncles, wife, children, grandparents, nieces, nephews, co-workers, friends?  If not, I am sorry for you.  The significance these people play in your life is hinging on the connection they had with you in a previous life or lives.

In my own case, devoid of possession or delusion, I have been able to trace those of significance to me back over several lives.  No one I deal with on a continuous basis is someone with whom I do not have a prior affiliation. 

You may make your case studies and promise us that you will soundly refute "reincarnation" but you have yet to refute anything, and what you say and the sources you quote do not alter what I feel to be right. 

I am sorry for those with whom you live your life...your inability to accept the significance they hold in your life must be painful to those of them who see beyond the dogma.  My best wishes to you and to them.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Berserk2
Super Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 844
Gender: male
Re: The Watseka Wonder
Reply #6 - Mar 3rd, 2010 at 11:18pm
 
Ah, recoverer, by your own admission you don't even know what circular reasoning is.  So I get New Age dogma from you, complete with the jargon---higher self and soul disk both logically incoherent notions!  I mean, have you ever paused to reflect on what  life in the Disk is like! 

And when I find the time to develop my full reply, I will summon you from the sheltered New Age Ghetto into the big bad world of scientific research, where "resonating with loved ones" is rightly dismissed as too subjective to serve as a rationale for faith in reincarnaton.  Like I said, stay tuned! Wink

Don
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
DocM
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 2168
Re: The Watseka Wonder
Reply #7 - Mar 3rd, 2010 at 11:49pm
 
Usetawuz,

It is you who are a bit out of line here.  No one would deny you your right to believe that you have strong connections to your oved ones that transcend this life.  But there are those of differing opinions.   My love for my family is strong - I've told my seven year old that I am convinced that my love for him is so strong, I would volunteer to incarnate to watch over him - were it possible.  Maybe, in fact I did.  However, I have no evidence of this.  Much evidence gathered via hypnosis supports the reincarnation hypothesis (Michael Newton).  However, one experienced hypnotherpist on this forum (Dave-MBS) has said that he believed that Michael Newton led his patients by suggestive questions under hypnosis.  That is why they all gave similar pre-life answers, and found past lives.  He led them to open doors, and look inside, and they had instant tremendous knowledge influxes of a life.  Was it theirs?  It sure felt like it to those under hypnosis.  Could they have had a soul or mind merger and been so blown away that they felt they experienced the "past life" from their own eyes - absolutely. 

We have enough to work through in this life, enough joy, pain, wonder and heartache.  So much so, how sad it is really that many of us lose sight of the present and try to sort through a hypothetical but unproven past life.   Hello?  You are here.  I am here. 

Put another way.  If we do reincarnate and wipe our memories, there is a reason for that.  Almost a tacit agreement.  So to say to a loved one, "ah yes, I am repaying a karmic debt to you from a past life where I did harm to you," is to give more credence to an unproven past and thereby lose opportunities for living in the here and now.

Some argue that we must investigate past lives to heal traumatized aspects of ourselves.  If, after we die, we have the time. and our minds are opened enough to all information that we can actually do this, I say - great idea!  However, it seems that while here on earth, we are meant to live in the here and now.  We shouldn't rob our interactions with our loved ones with speculation about past life interactions with them that are all just speculation.

Explore - yes.  Keep an open mind.  Reincarnation may not be as common as some presume - but either way, explore on your own. 

But live for today.  Hug your loved one because you love them in the present.


Matthew
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
recoverer
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 5027
Gender: male
Re: The Watseka Wonder
Reply #8 - Mar 3rd, 2010 at 11:57pm
 
Don:

I agree that there is a lot of bogus new age information, but if one has experiences showing that the disk viewpoint is in some way true, why would one deny it?

If it's valuable to incarnate once, why not more than once? Once a soul becomes quite large, it makes sense that it would incarnate just one small part of itself in order to learn what it needs to learn and to contribute to what needs to be done.

Ever since I was a kid I had a way of approaching life that went beyond what I learned as a kid. Where did such knowledge come from? It wasn't a matter of being influenced by a spirit that was attached to me, because the knowledge I speak of includes being loving towards other kids even when they were mean to me.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
goobygirl
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 167
USA
Gender: female
Re: The Watseka Wonder
Reply #9 - Mar 4th, 2010 at 2:26am
 
Brian Weiss is one of the people who helped me understand reincarnation:

http://www.brianweiss.com/

It seems illogical that a "loving" creator would only you one life to "get it right" or damn you to eternal hell for simply being human.
Back to top
 

Goobygirl
 
IP Logged
 
heisenberg69
Super Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 504
England
Gender: male
Re: The Watseka Wonder
Reply #10 - Mar 4th, 2010 at 10:07am
 
I don't know about reincarnation, (I'm keeping an open mind on it) but lets have a level playing field here. If apparently 'new age' beliefs are to be scrutinized by 'the big bad world of scientific research' as Don puts it then should'nt all beliefs, including Christianity, be measured by the same yardstick ? Why should one belief have 'special' status over another ?   
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Beau
Super Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1176
Greenville SC
Gender: male
Re: The Watseka Wonder
Reply #11 - Mar 4th, 2010 at 10:39am
 
Thanks for pointing out the ELEPHANT in the room, Heisenberg. I hoped someone would.
Back to top
 

All the world's a stage...whose stage?--that is the question!...or is it the answer...Who is on first.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
usetawuz
Senior Member
****
Offline


ALK Member

Posts: 397
ne fla
Gender: male
Re: The Watseka Wonder
Reply #12 - Mar 4th, 2010 at 12:04pm
 
DocM wrote on Mar 3rd, 2010 at 11:49pm:
Usetawuz,

It is you who are a bit out of line here.  No one would deny you your right to believe that you have strong connections to your oved ones that transcend this life.  But there are those of differing opinions.   My love for my family is strong - I've told my seven year old that I am convinced that my love for him is so strong, I would volunteer to incarnate to watch over him - were it possible.  Maybe, in fact I did.  However, I have no evidence of this.  Much evidence gathered via hypnosis supports the reincarnation hypothesis (Michael Newton).  However, one experienced hypnotherpist on this forum (Dave-MBS) has said that he believed that Michael Newton led his patients by suggestive questions under hypnosis.  That is why they all gave similar pre-life answers, and found past lives.  He led them to open doors, and look inside, and they had instant tremendous knowledge influxes of a life.  Was it theirs?  It sure felt like it to those under hypnosis.  Could they have had a soul or mind merger and been so blown away that they felt they experienced the "past life" from their own eyes - absolutely. 

We have enough to work through in this life, enough joy, pain, wonder and heartache.  So much so, how sad it is really that many of us lose sight of the present and try to sort through a hypothetical but unproven past life.   Hello?  You are here.  I am here. 

Put another way.  If we do reincarnate and wipe our memories, there is a reason for that.  Almost a tacit agreement.  So to say to a loved one, "ah yes, I am repaying a karmic debt to you from a past life where I did harm to you," is to give more credence to an unproven past and thereby lose opportunities for living in the here and now.

Some argue that we must investigate past lives to heal traumatized aspects of ourselves.  If, after we die, we have the time. and our minds are opened enough to all information that we can actually do this, I say - great idea!  However, it seems that while here on earth, we are meant to live in the here and now.  We shouldn't rob our interactions with our loved ones with speculation about past life interactions with them that are all just speculation.

Explore - yes.  Keep an open mind.  Reincarnation may not be as common as some presume - but either way, explore on your own. 

But live for today.  Hug your loved one because you love them in the present.


Matthew


Thank you Matthew...however I am not sure my comments were out of line.  I referenced opinions that I hold in response to another's opinions intended to refute them.       

I agree that our lives are for living in this day, and when I sense a level of increased familiarity with others I want to  find its source.  I have no interest in delving into any aspect of karmic debt or obligation, as that will take care of itself and healing wounds or past injuries has not been my goal, either.  My desire has been to understand the relationships I have with others and it has been enormously gratifying.

While this may not appeal to others, it may never occur to others to consider it if I don't bring it up...and that should have as much credence on this board as another stating he has evidence that will refute my beliefs.   

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
DocM
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 2168
Re: The Watseka Wonder
Reply #13 - Mar 4th, 2010 at 12:19pm
 
This may not be pleasing to what some want to hear, but it is in no way meant to be an insult to anyone's belief system:

On looking at things further, it seems to me that belief in reincarnation, and the probing of past lives and karma seems to be feeding an ego-based need.  If we look at all the signs we get from heaven and the afterlife - the golden rule, acting out of love for others instead of personal gain, etc. all those things speak to thought and action in the present, as well as cultivating a certain sense of humility and selflessness with a desire more to serve others than to focus on one's own desires.

If I probe a "past life" in order to understand why I act a certain way now, or what tendencies I brought with me to this life, it is, in some ways indulging my ego based thinking - we are separte from God while incarnate, and my probing of a past life where I willingly separated myself off inside a body may lead useful information to my curious mind/ego.  It does not, however, change the path of spiritual evolution through love of God and one's fellow man.  It does not change the reality that in order to act out of love we must let go of our ego based thinking, in order to become part of the bigger picture.  This doesn't require melting into a mindless void, but many of us suffer from these earthly ego based attachments.  Perhaps, if I may be so bold, the desire to explore past lives and karma is, in some ways holding on ego based attachments.     

So in some ways, perhaps I find myself less interested in exploring potential past lives, because I've seen and experienced enough in this life to know that spiritual evolution moves away from ego based karmic thinking. 

When one acts out of love, there is no negative karma.  The wheel of karma is broken, because one removes the isolated incarnated entity from the game.


Matthew
Back to top
« Last Edit: Mar 4th, 2010 at 3:50pm by DocM »  
 
IP Logged
 
Rondele
Ex Member


Re: The Watseka Wonder
Reply #14 - Mar 4th, 2010 at 12:30pm
 
Don-

I read the article, but my own problem with it is that it requires us to accept the accounts of folks long since dead.  In all fairness I haven't read the book itself, and maybe it's well-documented. 

Right now I'd have to say it's interesting but I wouldn't characterize it as the "most powerful evidence for an afterlife ever provided by a single case."  At least not until I see more documentation so that the credibility of the account can be more accurately assessed.

Another potential problem is that in the mid-19th century it was not at all uncommon for these types of stories to be circulated for the express purpose of publicity and getting people to come to the area out of curiosity to check it out.

And when that happens, money also comes to the town, which was always the motive behind circulating such stories in the first place.

The article reminded me of the concept of "walk-ins" that Ruth Montgomery wrote about.  Supposedly a human can willingly relinquish his/her body to someone in the afterlife who wants to incarnate right away, instead of going through the regular stages.  Her "guides" claimed that this happens in rare cases.

Of course, her guides also insisted by the year 2,000 the earth would shift on its axis and there would be mass devastation and huge casualties.

Oh well, maybe the guides were off by 12 years!  Wink

R
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print


This is a Peer Moderated Forum. You can report Posting Guideline violations.