b2
Ex Member
|
I appreciate what you're doing and your right to do it, but when I look at this list of questions I see only assumptions on the part of anyone who accepts these answers as true. For instance, it states that there 'are' aliens on other planets who have the same heaven and hell (which you assume possibly exist, based on your questions). And yet, the center of the earth is supposedly the location of our hell and their hell. Or I could assume so. Because you asked if their heaven and hell are the 'same' as ours, and the pendulum said yes. So what do those yes's and no's mean?
The more yes and no answers you build on, the more assumptions you are making, in my opinion. There are answers which are actually diffuse, which come from life itself. They are just 'knowings' which come from experience and observation.
Personally, I have just surfaced from a situation in which 'yes' and 'no' answers were preferred, as if I was being investigated by a person who had no idea there were shades of gray and even colors in my reality. This person has certain ideas of what 'truth' is, and certain ideas of what an honest answer is, which don't actually correspond to the reality in which I live.
Therefore, I cannot relate to these answers given, nor the method. Although I appreciate brevity, these answers are too brief, too brief to be real, for my taste.
What do you get from 'yes, no, both, maybe'? I think there are understandings much deeper than that, and I am eternally frustrated by this level of discourse.
However, have at it. It's certainly interesting. I just don't trust it.
|