DocM wrote on Feb 13th, 2010 at 12:35am:Seraphis,
Your denial of the existence of Jesus is not based on historical fact, written records, eye witness testimonies, etc. As such, unfortunately it is Kool-Aid New Age drivel. While it is not wrong to question the evidence behind anything (i.e. did Jesus of Nazareth exist?), you would have to have gone through the ancient writings, records, etc. to have any way to meaningfully answer this question.
The similarities of JC to Egyptian Gods, writings of the Essenes, etc. in no way shows that he did or did not exist and walk the earth. Ridiculous. Now, if you use afterlife exploration techniques, and astral exploration, along with NDEs, you find overwhelming evidence that Jesus did/does exist and manifests himself to others. Monroe wrote of an episode where JC passed by on a chariot and all exposed their abdomens to him - and at that point, Monroe mentioned that the son of God was flying through the heavens.
The anti-biblical New Age conspiracy theories that fly around the Web/internet have major holes - we've been through this before on this forum before you joined.
All that being said, I do think the story of JC is a perfect story for others to follow to find God and ascend in the afterlife. To act lovingly, to rid oneself of ego. In some ways, JC is a perfect model of one who was incarnate in flesh, making a seamless transition into heaven and showing the way to other people. So the symbolism you mention is accurate.
But please, if you insist on trying to argue that JC is only a myth, you are doing so on no factual data, and in the process are offending a great many people.
Matthew
Hi Doc: Unfortunately the documentation you suggest exists as research by mainstream scholars has been shown to be forgeries. Especially, the
Josephus reference which is the only Roman reference that was suppose to have existed...
But, if one understands the symbolism of the Old and New Testament then certainly one will gain thereby because the symbolism is profoundly accurate in the path it lays down for "enlightenment".
I remember the Chariot incident in Monroe's work only vaguely, but, what I do recall is that he did not identify the Being as Jesus... it could have been any symbol of the
Divine...
In the Astral, symbolism is even more pronounced, I have seen Tabernacles and the Eucharest in my
"samadhi" experience, and I was profoundly affected by the experience, but, when I read the Monroe account of
The Emitter and the
Aperture.... I realized what I saw was symbolized to protect me from radiation I could not have withstood had I seen it as it really was as Monroe did...
Pure Divine Energy... if you will recall Monroe almost dropped his body in that incident. And he says it took a long time to recover physically.
S.