The physical universe

http://alansmysticalmind.ning.com/

All information, both past, present, and future, exists in the ““Superconsciousness”.” The “Superconsciousness” (or Collective Mind) transcends time and space and with diligent practice, is consciously accessible from the deep state of awareness.

Sentient“ intelligent beings in the universe are interconnected in what I call the Superconsciousness” this is not God, it is where information comes from for all accurate predictions and visions, whether auditory, visual, or emotional. It encompasses all that is and all that will be in our universe. In truth, it is where our thoughts go to and come from.

We only perceive these whispering thoughts in our brain and usually take little notice of them but we should try to be more aware and connect with this source of universal knowledge for the benefit of humankind, we have learned to filter out them to our disadvantage.

I see it as something similar to the hive mind of the bee or ant but that, which connects all higher beings in one consciousness throughout the universe. I speculate this “Superconsciousness” is finite consisting of finite albeit highly intelligent life forms throughout the universe and “is not the infinite creator God” but one of his creations. A sort of galactic, or universal internet, think how useful this source would be if only we could gain access to it when we want to?

Maybe the universe is a sleeping giant a sort colossal being and we are just neurons within it, but I don’t really like this idea of a living evolving intelligent universe

The physical universe is unimaginably beautiful a crown diamond the most precious jewel in of Gods crown his achievement a creation with for he was well pleased, exploding with life and light. These are some of the heavens that declare the glory of God

Strange worlds revolving around other stars within other galaxies, are painted in a myriad of colors unknown and unseen of earth blazed, flashed, revolved in glorious maelstroms like colossal aurora borealis in such glory in the heavily planes and the physical universe that would have blinded human eyes.

Cerulean clouds of energy rolled and merged changing into aubergine, incarnadine and green viridity, gladeen, misord, bladgreed, blueploom, surgrrezeing, astromosterdram, these words for some of these colors just entered my mind and I remembered then for this document. Beings on planets such as these communicate by flashing colors of a billion different shades and spectrums, each subtle shade can have a particular meaning of mean more than all the data on earth in a moment

There are plasma beings Dwellers on the furnaces of the suns, to them the inferno we call the surface of a sun or star is cool life giving warmth. They survive on magnetic energy.

I went amongst the stars, saw their mighty glory and glorious multi-colored planets, and observed great beings with huge gossamer wings that were a million kilometers from wingtip to wingtip, which sailed on radiant light in the dark oceans of space that makes up most of the universe.

Some worlds were so similar to earth that at first I thought I was looking at earth or a city of earth. But a closer look revealed odd differences, the gait of the beings, their transport vehicles all differed minutely.

On other world the entities were so odd so different that I thought they were just part of the background a rock or a long thin dark looking tree, but they are highly evolved sentient beings like us.

Size is relative and there are huge entities and entities unimaginable small, most very small life form are hive based minds and at the hive level sentient and intelligent with purpose.

Some lived at a much slower rate than humans, their year a billion years compared to ours. They do not know we exist; we are fleeting vibrating electrons to them.

Far in the utter dark of space dark worlds exist in the void remote from any other are worlds hanging alone in the abysmal cold of absolute zero. But are these worlds dead and void of life? Not so, beings exist on them and they live so slowly that the life of the universe is but a day to them. To them ice is a raging inferno.

Other beings come into existence like a fundamental particle, live and die in one infinitesimal moment, to small for our best instrument to measure, but they are intelligent living beings like us.

Hi Alan,

I like your post. Like you, I have seen other worlds as well. What we call the nonphysical is only our perception because our consciousness is focused and constrained by ELS. When your consciousness is focused in other worlds/frames of reality, like you mentioned, there exists all sorts of beings.  Other worlds, like ELS is teaming with life of all types imaginable and unimaginable.

However, I wonder why you say this: "Maybe the universe is a sleeping giant a sort colossal being and we are just neurons within it, but I don’t really like this idea of a living evolving intelligent universe."

This is exactly how I think the universe is.  We are all evolving consciousness, individually and as a whole.  You've experienced the beauty of how consciousness has evolved so far.  A gigantic, brilliant being of love consciousness... Just think of how much we don't know and how more glorious consciousness could become as all of us individualized consciousness grow spiritually in love, reduce our entropy, thereby becoming more organized, brighter and even more beautiful. Each of us have an effect on the whole consciousness evolution system... what is most beneficial/profitable to that system will continue to survive and become even more of what it already is... how lovely.  Words cannot even begin to describe...

Kathy

Bruce helped me with this earlier, but I'm having trouble finding his help... how do I properly quote something on the boards?

pratekya

I accept you critique and disbelief, but have you been to Timbuktu or even know it exists.

You are in the wrong forum if you do not like the mysterious or supernatural and if I am a liar so are the majority of members on this great forum of esoteric and metaphysical thinkers. You see many of the guys here have had experiences more profound than mine and that includes Bruce Moen the Administrator

Go to my blog at the bottom link and read some of my stuff and you might read that I am not so one dimensional like you think

Lights of Love wrote on Oct 19^th, 2009 at 9:22am:


Hi Kathy I believe you in the absolute. Those who have not experienced what we have might like Pratekya suggest or say outright we are liars.

My statement about Timbuktu was many people think it is a city of fantasy not real, but I know it is real and located in the country of Mali. Because pratekya has not been there he could suggest to people who have that they are lying or delusional

Bets!!

Thank you for your kind comments and you know as well as many others on the forum I have proved to the forum that I posses psychic gifts

I'll respond to OOBD first, as I've been busy and haven't had a chance to respond until now.

Quote:


1.  I don't necessarily believe the collective consciousness exists; I think it’s honestly somewhat irrelevant compared to the questions of does God exist and does the afterlife exist, and what are they like.  I am not opposed a collective consciousness existing however.
2.  I don't think this is a valid argument; it is not at all obvious that we should be able to access what Alan is talking about here as biological beings

Quote:


Indeed, how useful it would be.  The trouble is that there is a lack of verifiable evidence to support this that people have access to this whenever they consciously want to know anything.  Seriously,  if this was done at will, in a very demonstrable way, natural disasters would be avoided, national defenses and offenses would be bolstered, there would be billionaires made through the stock market and lotteries, and there would be people and nations flocking to these people to learn how to do just this.  The absence of worldwide consistent verifiable evidence to support this seems to suggest that it is not obvious; in fact your point has not been made… following your logic actually, the fact that we don’t see these verifiable evidences of this is makes the case against your argument of a collective consciousness existing.

Quote:


Interesting comment, as I am not making that strong claim that it cannot be accessed, if it exists.  You are beating a straw man here.  I do believe in intuition, and the spirit of God as it moves with knowledge to people.  I do not believe that God is a means to our end of glorifying ourselves or satisfying our own curiosity however.  The spirit of God does as it pleases, not the other way around.  And like I said, I do not know if the collective unconscious actually exists (and think in the bigger scheme of things, it is not as important as other issues).  I also tend to believe that Bruce Moen and Swedenborg have done some valid exploration, although I wouldn’t necessarily subscribe to everything they have written because of the inherent subjectivity of the experiences.

Quote:


Um, lets see the evidence?  Nostrodomus is your evidence?  Maybe, but his quatrains were so lyrical and non specific that you could find quite a bit in there that was probably not intended.  Governmental programs?  I’ve read about a couple, and it seems like they are all discontinued; remote viewing and such, because they could not get constantly correct and verifiable results.  It’s hard to launch a missile strike on someone’s impression if they may be wrong.  Did these programs have some successes?  Sure, but nothing like ‘with diligent practice is consciously accessible from the deep state of awareness’.  In addition, if these programs were successful, wouldn’t we have our whole intelligence agency based on these principles?  The absence of these natural consequences argues against your conclusion.  Again, these are people who had some insight from beyond, but to be 100% correct and certain about these things would be making a strong claim that is not supported by the evidence.

Quote:


Actually, again, I am not claiming that I know for certain that the collective unconscious doesn’t exist, so I do not need to prove that your evidence of Nostradomus and governmental programs are untrue.  Nonetheless, I think I have shown that your support of Nostradamus and governmental programs as support of the existence of a collective unconscious are very weak at best, and definitely unconvincing.

Quote:


I was saying that when it comes to unverifiable sources, we should “consider the source, and consider the claims”.  Just because Alan is parroting a lot of New Age ideas that people already subscribe to doesn’t mean he is an authentic messenger.  And as for knowing something that you don’t; I have shown in past posts how Alan has been a plagiarizer and when his veneer of sweet spirituality is stripped aside he is very nasty and arrogant, attacking me on grounds of being more important than I, attacking me because I would question him, and only later coming to admit that he was plagiarizing information.  Unfortunately I can’t find the posts at the moment; maybe Alan deleted them.  I also posted how I thought his spamming of crap had pretty much ruined this site that used to have actual seekers and critical thought going on as opposed to self aggrandizing claims and references to one’s own website such as “Alan McDougal Master of Wisdom” (I’m not making this up – do a search, it’s the title of his webpage).  He later claimed he was joking when he made the name of the page.

On to Alan’s responses.

Quote:

By analogy, I assume you are arguing that since I have not been to your realms you supposedly experienced then I don’t know if it exists or not.  I agree.  I would say there is no verifiable way to know if your realms exist or not with certainty, with a deductive argument.  I would say we could make an inductive argument that it is unlikely your realms as you described them exist because I don’t believe you are a reliable messenger based on your past actions of arrogance and plagiarism.

Quote:


I am in the right forum at times when people who like the mysterious and supernatural also like critical reasoning and thought, which is not always the case here honestly.  In reality, I would say I’m more in the spirit of Bruce Moen than you are, with his emphasis on testing and verifying to oneself that one’s own reactions are correct.  In addition, since Bruce has an engineering background and I have a science background I think we simply share a similar way of looking at the world that doesn’t take everything at face value.

Quote:


No, again not true, and good job trying to link yourself with the whole group as a bunch of victims against my evil questioning and critique, along with a healthy dose of flattery to the group.

Quote:


No, the difference is the city you are mentioning secondly is experimentally verifiable, which is different in kind, not degree, from your stories that casually include visiting other worlds with strange creatures.

Quote:


1.  Wow talk about vague.  Let me start us off, and I will do the same thing that Alan has done.  Please write this down; note this – here is my prediction: In the month of November and December of this year, there will be a disaster that happens somewhere in the world.  Now in a couple months we can revisit this issue, and everyone can admit (if you buy this logic) that I am just as much of a predictor of the future as Alan is.  Is this argument for real?  I’m stunned…  I have a son now and I would hope that by the time my son is in middle school he would be able to realize that this is an invalid argument.  If you make your predictions vague enough, they will come true.  Making extremely vague predictions couched in lyrical language does not prove you have psychic abilities, even if submitted to a website that is uncritical.  While it may be fact that you have made an incredibly vague prediction, that doesn’t mean that your prediction is either useful or actually coming from anything but a self deluding mind that wants to be recognized as something great (Alan McDougal, Master of Wisdom).

This vague prediction directly contrasts with what Alan has been inferring that he is in contact with, which is as follows:

Quote:


So how about something a little more useful?  Like something like “Hey if you live in Louisiana or Florida or Mississippi, get out because a monster hurricane is coming your way, and it will hit about August 27th, 2005.  This is what we should expect if people like Alan can tap into the superconsciousness that is consciously accessible.  Again, the absence of such warnings (from anyone, not just Alan) is evidence that lends itself to the argument that this superconsciousness either doesn’t exist or people who access it aren’t consistently reliable enough to depend on.

I want to state or ask in conclusion:

1.  I do believe that something like a superconsciousness might possibly exist, but I don’t assume it does or doesn’t a priori. 
2.  Is it possible to think critically, not automatically accept every story that someone wants to share and still explore ideas of the afterlife?  I believe the answer is yes.
3.  Is it reasonable to accept what everyone claims as their experience as objectively true?

Pratekya,

Of course, the questions of verification must consider at least 5 possible interpretations: (1) One incarnate person reads another incarnate human's mind and gleans information about a third party. (2) One incarnate person reads a discarmate person's  mind without his knowledge or active participation and distorts this by repackaging the experience as a soul to soul communication.  (3) One incarnate person communicates with a discarnate person who knowingly engages in conversation.  (4) A demonic spirit impersonates a deceased person by sharing information gleaned from the deceased prior to his demise, when in fact the deceased no longer exists.  (5) An incarnate human contacts no discrete mind, but rather reads the information from the Akashic records or the Collective Unconscious.

New Agers tend to select the most comforting explanation without regard to what is counter-intuitive.  I agree with Pratekya's main argument: one might expect spectacular breakthroughs in knowledge on a wide front if we really could tune in to alleged Akashic records.  To control the wishful thinking of groupthink, we must analyze Deafening Silence.
In other words, if I can really contact a discarnate spirit or the Collective Unconscious, what would I expect to learn that is in fact unavailable to me?  For example, the dead spirit might say, "Contact my sister Mabel Shaw in Pittsburgh.  She has my baseball card collection in a blue box in her attic.  The failure to address Deafening Silence is the Achilles heel of New Age pretensions to afterlife contact.

Don   

OOBD,

I'll bet I've had more paranormal experiences and supernatural experiences of guidance than you have.  Even so, integrity demands that I consider the possibility that I have been deluded or have misinterpreted what I've experienced.  That's the only path to true knowledge. 

Don