SL, I think that you may be a little confused. You must be a man. Like myself. Ask a mother if she has communication with her new baby. Because someone like Stephen Hawking doesn't speak, does that mean he has no soul?
What do you mean by "comprehend the reality"?

I see babies as having a phyical impairment also. When we choose to exist in a new body and enter it at some point. (not sure when) learning to control and use the body effectively would take some time. That includes all the complexities of learning language and that sort of communication.
If I made the choice to exist in a cats body...it would take time to learn the complexities of tail movement. Or walk using four legs. I would think anyways.
When you look into the eyes of a newborn baby, you feel their discomfort when they need a change of diapers or their hungry. Or cold. Or even just need some love. This NVC sort of communication starts at the beginning. Now the soul entering the body at birth...I am not so sure about. It could enter well befor that time. Perhaps not at conception....but that is an argument for the right to life/pro choice.

Hi Still Living,

Read the following post by tom campbell. It may enlighten   you.: http://www.my-big-toe.com/phpBB34/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=3254&p=7406&hilit=brain#p7...

I see it the same way Campbell does in that post of him.
In short: The soul (or whatever there may be beyond the physical) can manifest itself in the physical only within the limitations of it's physical body and the physical rules. If a soul doesn't have a physical body, it can't manifest physically. The body in turn is the physical "agent" through which the soul can directly act in the physical.

Interesting memory Bets.

Spooky

just a thought: perhaps not for pleasure, but certainly for curiosity

every individual a new generation, characteristics not completely known

perhaps for some, a moment of curiosity is quite enough on this earth plane, hard to say what is 'enough' for another individual, for the experience they chose

often, consequences are not known for a long period of time, understanding is not possible until then

I like Campbell more and more, maybe one day I'll even try "My Big TOE"...

Spooky

I noticed that people at that site ask Tom Campbell a question, and then they seem to accept the answer as if it's gospel. I don't care who a source of information is, a person doesn't do his (or herself) a favor if he becomes overly dependent on what another person says. People need to learn a way to find out for themselves.  

One example, somebody asked Tom Campbell if Jane Roberts made up Seth or is Seth a real being, and he answered that Seth is a higher level being.  

Fortunately,  I don't find it necessary to rely on what somebody like Tom Campbell said, because I found my own way to determine what Seth is about, and various things lead me to believe that Jane made up Seth. Even if she actually channeled Seth, and Seth says numerous things that are true, he has certainly said enough things that are false, that he shouldn't be thought of as some infallible light being.

I guess if a person wants to take Tom Campbell's word for it and accept what Seth has to say accordingly, he will be influenced accordingly.

A day will come, perhaps another incarnation, where such a person/soul will find that it isn't a good idea to put other people on such a pedestal that you forget to think for yourself.