Hi Bets, Kathy. It's hard not to think Bets when you read with an open mind that there's not lots of work that's been left in that situation.
The culture of highly aggressive competition that prevails in academia has with vested interests resulted in a situation where objective scientific method and acceptable (
not accepted) theories amount to an institutional dogma that not just excludes but actively attacks the subjective, and all thinking that threatens the cosy status quo.
I'll pass on the link, it'd be interesting to find out if this man's work connects in any specific way with what's reported in the sources I quoted. I seem to remember that Lynn McTaggart in the Field describes to work which was able to identify plant responses of the sort Cathy mentions in plants, but I don't know who it was attributed to.
Here's a couple of links to McTaggart - first her blog on the topic of the Field, and then an interview with her where she talks of the link demonstrated in experiments between plant growth rates and intention.
http://livingthefield.ning.com/profiles/blog/list?user=LynneMcTaggarthttp://www.shareguide.com/McTaggart.htmlThis for me is incredibly important work, if only because it may result through scientific validation in the bringing of a view which has been the preserve of the spiritual traditions into mainstream acceptance.
Intellectual understanding of the reality of interdependence and interconnectedness is only a start towards living in love, but the first step is often the most important...