Juditha. That story has been going around New Age circles for years. I've even read it in several books. I think even David Icke subscribes to it or he believes that Mary Magdalene was Jesus's wife and they had a child together, spurning a whole tribe of descendants to this present day. Don-Berserk could clarify this if he wished to add his comments. If that priest has really hurt you, then write a letter to his local Bishop about it. Sincerely. Carl and Family

Juditha,

I am getting so angry at your church that I think I cannot read your posts about these people any more !
What does your heart tell you? How could you doubt all you have received from JC. ?
IMO your priest is jealous that you have your own connection to Christ, separate from the priest's.

Grrr-rrr-rr! (to your priest)

Bets

Perhaps Juditha can have the opinion that the priest's opinion is a bad opinion.

Volu wrote on Feb 13^th, 2009 at 12:35pm:

Recoverer,
"Perhaps Juditha can have the opinion that the priest's opinion is a bad opinion."

Yes, absoulutely, and probably a healthy measurement for one's path. But, argument because one's opinion makes you upset, and wrong to even consider, to me suggests one's trying to stop someone from having an opinion. This may of course not be the case, but that's what jumps out at me.

Berserk2 wrote on Feb 12^th, 2009 at 10:07pm:


Thanks Don. So much I don't know about the religion I was brought up to follow when as a youngster but abandoned as a teenager -  adult. Still, the search for truth I'm on now provides me with a great deal of fun and excitement, plus some knowledge of all or most other belief systems. Sincerely. Carl and Family

 I agree Devayan, it's very important for people to go within for truth more than concentrating on outer sources.  

 But its not a black and white issue by any means.   There are times when outer sources play the role of catalyst for people.   There are times and situations when outer sources can act as a check and balance to ones own limited perceptions and beliefs.  When one is fully and always attuned to Source, then one can say rightfully "i need no other outer sources at all".

 For example, say there are a bunch of what i would call good psychic sources, meaning which all have some repeating verifications and have a strong love vibe/emphasis to them, and they all say a very similar thing re: a particular subject or idea, but then self has a rather different belief and perception.  

Should one automatically change ones belief and perception because of the difference?    No, BUT such a discrepancy should at least make one more receptive to being open to the possibility that self could be off about said perception/belief.   One could more sincerely and openly seek an answer within self.

  There is a certain arrogance in the attitude of "i'm only going to listen to self" when one knows, or should know that self is not completely and always attuned to Source and PUL and thus self contains and experiences distortion on various levels.  Distortions within, make for distorted perceptions of phenomena "without". 

 Also, about going within.  To me, its not enough to just meditate, go OOB, or what not to get info.   Monroe did the latter for many years before he really started to clear up his limiting beliefs and perceptions.

 It wasn't until he created and started using his affirmation which asks for help from helpful etc. sources, that he (and his explorers) really began to expand spiritually.

 It's very important to go within by bringing up the feeling/perception/awareness of PUL and imo asking to attune only to the most creative, loving, and helpful sources there are within and without self.  
 I'm fairly "psychic" or rather more intuitive.  There have been times in the past wherein i went more within for info, but without using the above method and i got mislead.   This is because there are many nonphysical sources which out of ignorance or malice, would love to mislead a human, and i've been mislead--then there are own misleading, distorting--shadow aspects.  

 Most times that i have sought for info in a helpful sense, especially towards others with no strings attached, my psychic accuracy and helpfulness is higher, but those times wherein i was seeking info out of shadow aspect tendencies then the info was inaccurate, misleading, and/or created inharmony for me.

 This is so, so, so important to get.  Particularly with meditation because meditation is a process wherein one is opening self and selfs perception up.  One becomes more receptive during meditation.   Meditation in and of itself, is more "neutral" and so both ones inner/deeper motivations and intentions are very important, along with some kind of directed, conscious, positive intent like Monroe's affirmation.
 Greater receptivity requires greater discernment and discrimination both to self and to outer sources.  Meditation as seemingly taught by various Eastern belief systems, to me lacks because it promotes what i call "over right brainess" without the necessary predirection of conscious, positive intent and the balance of the left brain part of us.   Some eastern sourced meditation stuff that i read, seemed to say that one is suppose to have no thought during meditation and that the "void" is the goal--complete emptiness of self.   

  Self can never be completely "empty", but more importantly self can choose to become very receptive and then to fill itself up with PUL, which then expands self to an all inclusive consciousness of at-One-ment with Source and all Creation.

 Personally, i ask the CEO of this Universe--the Planning Intelligence aka Christ, to direct me of late--there are none more expanded in all the Universes than He for He is the original Retriever and Co-Creator with Source par excellence.   So far, so good.